Validating biorobotic models

Some issues in neuroscience can be addressed by building robot models of biological sensorimotor systems. What we can conclude from building models or simulations, however, is determined by a number of factors in addition to the central hypothesis we intend to test. These include the way in which the hypothesis is represented and implemented in simulation, how the simulation output is interpreted, how it is compared to the behaviour of the biological system, and the conditions under which it is tested. These issues will be illustrated by discussing a series of robot models of cricket phonotaxis behaviour.

[1]  Peter Lipton,et al.  Inference to the best explanation , 1993 .

[2]  Sanjay S. Joshi,et al.  A Biorobotic Investigation of Norway Rat Pups (Rattus norvegicus) in an Arena , 2004, Adapt. Behav..

[3]  Frank W. Grasso,et al.  Biomimetic robot lobster performs chemo-orientation in turbulence using a pair of spatially separated sensors: Progress and challenges , 2000, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[4]  Karl R. Popper.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery. , 1977 .

[5]  Verena V. Hafner,et al.  Cognitive Maps in Rats and Robots , 2005, Adapt. Behav..

[6]  G. Harman.  The Inference to the Best Explanation , 1965 .

[7]  Barbara Webb,et al.  Robot phonotaxis in the wild: a biologically inspired approach to outdoor sound localization , 2004, Adv. Robotics.

[8]  K. Schildberger,et al.  Temporal selectivity of identified auditory neurons in the cricket brain , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[9]  A Nabatiyan,et al.  Temporal pattern recognition based on instantaneous spike rate coding in a simple auditory system. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  R. Pfeifer,et al.  A mobile robot employing insect strategies for navigation , 2000, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[11]  Barbara Webb,et al.  Using robots to model animals: a cricket test , 1995, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[12]  B Hedwig,et al.  Mechanisms underlying phonotactic steering in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus revealed with a fast trackball system , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[13]  B. Webb,et al.  Can robots make good models of biological behaviour? , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  T. Hafting,et al.  Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex , 2005, Nature.

[15]  Berthold Hedwig,et al.  Auditory orientation in crickets: Pattern recognition controls reactive steering , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Barbara Webb,et al.  A simple latency-dependent spiking-neuron model of cricket phonotaxis , 2000, Biological Cybernetics.

[17]  Graham Priest,et al.  Can Theories Be Refuted , 1976 .

[18]  Richard E Reeve,et al.  New neural circuits for robot phonotaxis , 2003, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[19]  M. Redhead,et al.  How the Laws of Physics Lie. , 1984 .

[20]  Ryohei Kanzaki,et al.  Neural basis of odor-source searching behavior in insect brain systems evaluated with a mobile robot. , 2004, Chemical senses.

[21]  Christof Koch,et al.  Biophysics of Computation: Information Processing in Single Neurons (Computational Neuroscience Series) , 1998 .

[22]  Guglielmo Tamburrini,et al.  Machine Experiments and Theoretical Modelling: from Cybernetic Methodology to Neuro-Robotics , 2005, Minds and Machines.

[23]  J O'Keefe,et al.  Robotic and neuronal simulation of the hippocampus and rat navigation. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[24]  Angelo Arleo,et al.  Spatial cognition and neuro-mimetic navigation: a model of hippocampal place cell activity , 2000, Biological Cybernetics.

[25]  V. Braitenberg.  Vehicles, Experiments in Synthetic Psychology , 1984 .

[26]  Auke Jan Ijspeert,et al.  Simulation and Robotics Studies of Salamander Locomotion Applying Neurobiological Principles to the Control of Locomotion in Robots , 2005 .

[27]  F. Huber,et al.  Sound localisation in crickets , 1994, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.