Electrostimulation to reduce synaptic scaling driven progression of Alzheimer's disease

Cell death and synapse dysfunction are two likely causes of cognitive decline in AD. As cells die and synapses lose their drive, remaining cells suffer an initial decrease in activity. Neuronal homeostatic synaptic scaling then provides a feedback mechanism to restore activity. This homeostatic mechanism is believed to sense levels of activity-dependent cytosolic calcium within the cell and to adjust neuronal firing activity by increasing the density of AMPA synapses at remaining synapses to achieve balance. The scaling mechanism increases the firing rates of remaining cells in the network to compensate for decreases in network activity. However, this effect can itself become a pathology, as it produces increased imbalance between excitatory and inhibitory circuits, leading to greater susceptibility to further cell loss via calcium-mediated excitotoxicity. Here, we present a mechanistic explanation of how directed brain stimulation might be expected to slow AD progression based on computational simulations in a 470-neuron biomimetic model of a neocortical column. The simulations demonstrate that the addition of low-intensity electrostimulation (neuroprosthesis) to a network undergoing AD-like cell death can raise global activity and break this homeostatic-excitotoxic cascade. The increase in activity within the remaining cells in the column results in lower scaling-driven AMPAR upregulation, reduced imbalances in excitatory and inhibitory circuits, and lower susceptibility to ongoing damage.

[1]  S. Nelson,et al.  BDNF Has Opposite Effects on the Quantal Amplitude of Pyramidal Neuron and Interneuron Excitatory Synapses , 1998, Neuron.

[2]  Niraj S. Desai,et al.  Activity-dependent scaling of quantal amplitude in neocortical neurons , 1998, Nature.

[3]  William W. Lytton,et al.  A rule-based firing model for neural networks , 2005 .

[4]  Jan-Marino Ramirez,et al.  Activity Deprivation Leads to Seizures in Hippocampal Slice Cultures: Is Epilepsy the Consequence of Homeostatic Plasticity? , 2007, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[5]  Arthur Konnerth,et al.  Clusters of Hyperactive Neurons Near Amyloid Plaques in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease , 2008, Science.

[6]  D. Small Network dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease: does synaptic scaling drive disease progression? , 2008, Trends in molecular medicine.

[7]  William W Lytton,et al.  Training oscillatory dynamics with spike-timing-dependent plasticity in a computer model of neocortex , 2011, 2011 IEEE Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium (SPMB).

[8]  C. Petersen,et al.  The Excitatory Neuronal Network of the C2 Barrel Column in Mouse Primary Somatosensory Cortex , 2009, Neuron.

[9]  Ian Parker,et al.  Calcium Signaling and Amyloid Toxicity in Alzheimer Disease* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  Ehud Kaplan,et al.  Estimating the Amount of Information Conveyed by a Population of Neurons , 2011, Front. Neurosci..

[11]  Julien Modolo,et al.  Linking brain dynamics, neural mechanisms, and deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: an integrated perspective. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[12]  G. Leuba,et al.  Contribution of neural networks to Alzheimer disease's progression , 2009, Brain Research Bulletin.

[13]  Mark C. W. van Rossum,et al.  Stable Hebbian Learning from Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  William W Lytton,et al.  Multiscale modeling for clinical translation in neuropsychiatric disease , 2014, Journal of computational surgery.

[15]  Andreea Oliviana Diaconescu,et al.  Increased cerebral metabolism after 1 year of deep brain stimulation in Alzheimer disease. , 2012, Archives of neurology.

[16]  Violeta Dimova,et al.  Electrified minds: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (GVS) as methods of non-invasive brain stimulation in neuropsychology—A review of current data and future implications , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Safety limits of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in rats , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[18]  J. T. Francis,et al.  Electrostimulation as a Prosthesis for Repair of Information Flow in a Computer Model of Neocortex , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[19]  G. Turrigiano Too many cooks? Intrinsic and synaptic homeostatic mechanisms in cortical circuit refinement. , 2011, Annual review of neuroscience.

[20]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  Joining distributed pattern processing and homeostatic plasticity in recurrent on-center off-surround shunting networks: Noise, saturation, short-term memory, synaptic scaling, and BDNF , 2012, Neural Networks.

[21]  H. Möller,et al.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2003, CNS drugs.

[22]  Jianing Yu,et al.  Top-down laminar organization of the excitatory network in motor cortex , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  William W. Lytton,et al.  Rule-based firing for network simulations , 2006, Neurocomputing.

[24]  Michael L. Hines,et al.  The NEURON Book , 2006 .

[25]  Samuel A. Neymotin,et al.  Synaptic Scaling Balances Learning in a Spiking Model of Neocortex , 2013, ICANNGA.

[26]  G. Turrigiano The Self-Tuning Neuron: Synaptic Scaling of Excitatory Synapses , 2008, Cell.

[27]  Bruce W. Knight,et al.  Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience Computational Neuroscience Materials and Methods Surgical Preparation , 2022 .

[28]  Maxim Bazhenov,et al.  Pathological Effect of Homeostatic Synaptic Scaling on Network Dynamics in Diseases of the Cortex , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  L. Mucke,et al.  Amyloid-β–induced neuronal dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease: from synapses toward neural networks , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  Niels Hansen Action Mechanisms of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Alzheimer’s Disease and Memory Loss , 2012, Front. Psychiatry.

[31]  Boris Gourévitch,et al.  Evaluating information transfer between auditory cortical neurons. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  William W. Lytton,et al.  Emergence of Physiological Oscillation Frequencies in a Computer Model of Neocortex , 2011, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[33]  R. Douglas,et al.  A Quantitative Map of the Circuit of Cat Primary Visual Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  G. Shepherd Corticostriatal connectivity and its role in disease , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[35]  Michael L. Hines,et al.  Just-in-Time Connectivity for Large Spiking Networks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[36]  Shenfeng Qiu,et al.  Circuit-Specific Intracortical Hyperconnectivity in Mice with Deletion of the Autism-Associated Met Receptor Tyrosine Kinase , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  J. Rabey,et al.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with cognitive training is a safe and effective modality for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: a randomized, double-blind study , 2013, Journal of Neural Transmission.