Receptive-field organization of monkey superior colliculus.

A NUMBER OF recent studies suggest that the mammalian superior colliculus plays a crucial role in visually guided behavior (33, 35). Ablation experiments indicate that lesions in the hamster superior colliculus can cause severe deficits in orienting to visual and auditory stimuli while leaving intact the ability to discriminate pat serns in situ .ations in whi ch no orienting component is necessary for the successful performance of the discrimination (32). Related to this view is the idea that the colliculus plays an important role in the control of eye and head movements. After unilateral colliculectomy in the monkey, Denny-Brown (6) reports a fascinating cluster of eye-movement deficits. While the animal could look to either side or up and down, there was a slight divergent strabismus, and the optokinetic response was present only when the stripes entered the visual field from the operated side. Though the monkey could reach accurately for an object in the visual field contralateral to the lesion, he could not fixate the object, but only looked in its general direction. After bilateral colliculus lesions, monkeys showed fixed gaze, lack of reactivity to visual stimuli; lack of vocalization, and a variety of other deficits which led Denny-Brown to describe this structure as the “pattern setter of the nervous system.” Though other workers have failed to confirm the oculomotor deficits reported in this study (2, 28), recent work usi *g more sophisticated methods for head immobilization and eyemovement recording has confirmed and extended many of Denny-Brown’s original observations (M. Stryker, P. H. Schiller, and F. Koerner, unpublished observations). It

[1]  J. Apter,et al.  PROJECTION OF THE RETINA ON SUPERIOR COLLICULUS OF CATS , 1945 .

[2]  J. Apter,et al.  Eye movements following strychninization of the superior colliculus of cats. , 1946, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  D. Whitteridge,et al.  The representation of the retina on the optic tectum of the pigeon. , 1954, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology and cognate medical sciences.

[4]  G L GERSTEIN,et al.  An approach to the quantitative analysis of electrophysiological data from single neurons. , 1960, Biophysical journal.

[5]  W. Pitts,et al.  Two remarks on the visual system of the frog. , 1960, AFOSR TR. United States. Air Force. Office of Scientific Research.

[6]  M JACOBSON,et al.  The representation of the retina on the optic tectum of the frog. Correlation between retinotectal magnification factor and retinal ganglion cell count. , 1962, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology and cognate medical sciences.

[7]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  D. Denny-Brown,et al.  The Midbrain and Motor Integration , 1962, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[9]  Lawrence Kruger,et al.  Organization of the visual projection upon the optic tectum of a reptile (Alligator mississippiensis) , 1965, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[10]  T H MEIKLE,et al.  THE ROLE OF THE SUPERIOR COLLICULUS IN VISUALLY GUIDED BEHAVIOR. , 1965, Experimental neurology.

[11]  M. B. Bender,et al.  The superior colliculi and eye movements. An experimental study in the monkey. , 1966, Archives of neurology.

[12]  R. Hill,et al.  Responsiveness to sensory stimulation of units in the superior colliculus and subjacent tectotegmental regions of the rabbit. , 1966, Experimental neurology.

[13]  G. Schneider,et al.  Contrasting visuomotor functions of tectum and cortex in the golden hamster , 1967, Psychologische Forschung.

[14]  K. Chow,et al.  Influences of residual eye movements in single-unit studies of the visual system. , 1968, Brain research.

[15]  P. Marchiafava,et al.  Unit responses to visual stimuli in the superior colliculus of the unanesthetized, mid-pontine cat. , 1968, Archives italiennes de biologie.

[16]  N. Humphrey Responses to visual stimuli of units in the superior colliculus of rats and monkeys. , 1968, Experimental neurology.

[17]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  G. Schneider Two visual systems. , 1969, Science.

[19]  D Symmes,et al.  The superior colliculus and higher visual functions in the monkey. , 1969, Brain research.

[20]  L Kruger,et al.  The topography of the visual projection to the mesencephalon: a comparative survey. , 1970, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[21]  L. Kruger,et al.  Topography of the retinal projection upon the superior colliculus of the cat. , 1970, Vision research.

[22]  K. Schaefer Unit analysis and electrical stimulation in the optic tectum of rabbits and cats. , 1970, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[23]  C. R. Michael Integration of retinal and cortical information in the superior colliculus of the ground squirrel. , 1970, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[24]  D. Hubel,et al.  Stereoscopic Vision in Macaque Monkey: Cells sensitive to Binocular Depth in Area 18 of the Macaque Monkey Cortex , 1970, Nature.

[25]  D. L. Stewart,et al.  Receptive-field characteristics of superior colliculus neurons in the rabbit. , 1971, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  P. Schiller,et al.  Discharge characteristics of single units in superior colliculus of the alert rhesus monkey. , 1971, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  S. Kadoya,et al.  Photically evoked unit activity in the tectum opticum of the squirrel monkey , 1971, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[28]  B. Dow,et al.  Single-unit responses to moving visual stimuli in middle suprasylvian gyrus of the cat. , 1971, Journal of neurophysiology.