A sequential-arrivals model of territory acquisition II.

Birds arrive sequentially at their breeding ground where the nest sites vary in value (measured by reproductive success). Each bird may choose a vacant site or challenge an occupier for its site. In the latter case, the occupier is presumed to be the more-likely winner; the loser incurs a cost and must go to a vacant site. In a previous paper (Broom et al., 1997, J. theor. Biol.189, 257-272), we considered the optimal strategy. However, that optimal strategy was complex and perhaps could not be realized in real bird populations, making possibly costly demands both perceptually and at the coding level. With this in mind we introduce certain restricted classes of strategy, and consider how populations might evolve. Computer simulations of various populations have been performed to model the competition amongst several strategies in the presence of recurrent mutations. Certain combinations of strategies persisted and corresponded approximately to the ESSs found in Broom et al. (1997).

[1]  Chris Cannings,et al.  The n-person war of attrition , 1989 .

[2]  Ross Cressman,et al.  The Stability Concept of Evolutionary Game Theory: A Dynamic Approach , 1992 .

[3]  A Grafen,et al.  Sexual selection unhandicapped by the Fisher process. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics , 1998 .

[5]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[6]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Scrub jays (Aphelocoma coerulescens) remember the relative time of caching as well as the location and content of their caches. , 1999, Journal of comparative psychology.

[7]  John Maynard Smith Evolution and the Theory of Games: Mixed strategies – II. Examples , 1982 .

[8]  C Cannings,et al.  Multi-player matrix games. , 1997, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[9]  J. Neumann,et al.  The Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour , 1944 .

[10]  E. C. Zeeman,et al.  Population dynamics from game theory , 1980 .

[11]  Chris Cannings,et al.  The Finite Horizon War of Attrition , 1995 .

[12]  John M. McNamara,et al.  Dynamic optimization in fluctuating environments , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  Broom,et al.  A sequential-arrivals model of territory acquisition , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  Patsy Haccou,et al.  Effects of competition on optimal patch leaving: A war of attrition , 1994 .

[15]  A. Grafen Biological signals as handicaps. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  P. Berthold,et al.  Rapid microevolution of migratory behaviour in a wild bird species , 1992, Nature.

[17]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  The theory of evolution and dynamical systems , 1988 .

[18]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[19]  Zbigniew Nitecki,et al.  Global Theory of Dynamical Systems , 1980 .

[20]  H. Kokko Competition for early arrival in migratory birds , 1999 .

[21]  J M Smith,et al.  Evolution and the theory of games , 1976 .

[22]  John Haigh,et al.  Game theory and evolution , 1975, Advances in Applied Probability.

[23]  J. M. Smith,et al.  The Logic of Animal Conflict , 1973, Nature.

[24]  C. Barnard,et al.  Dominance hierarchies and the evolution of "individual recognition". , 1979, Journal of theoretical biology.

[25]  Chris Cannings,et al.  Models of animal conflict , 1976 .

[26]  Ken Binmore,et al.  Fun and games : a text on game theory , 1992 .

[27]  Mark Broom,et al.  Choosing a Nest Site: Contests and Catalysts , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[28]  Howard Raiffa,et al.  Games And Decisions , 1958 .

[29]  E. J. Collins,et al.  The hawk-dove game as an average cost problem , 1991 .