Energy use and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of drones for commercial package delivery

The use of automated, unmanned aerial vehicles (drones) to deliver commercial packages is poised to become a new industry, significantly shifting energy use in the freight sector. Here we find the current practical range of multi-copters to be about 4 km with current battery technology, requiring a new network of urban warehouses or waystations as support. We show that, although drones consume less energy per package-km than delivery trucks, the additional warehouse energy required and the longer distances traveled by drones per package greatly increase the life-cycle impacts. Still, in most cases examined, the impacts of package delivery by small drone are lower than ground-based delivery. Results suggest that, if carefully deployed, drone-based delivery could reduce greenhouse gas emissions and energy use in the freight sector. To realize the environmental benefits of drone delivery, regulators and firms should focus on minimizing extra warehousing and limiting the size of drones.The use of drones to deliver commercial packages is poised to become a new industry. Here the authors show that replacing truck delivery by drones can reduce greenhouse gas emissions and energy use when the drone size and additional warehousing requirements are limited.

[1]  K. T. Chau,et al.  An overview of energy sources for electric vehicles , 1999 .

[2]  J. Gordon Leishman,et al.  Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics , 2000 .

[3]  F. Beck,et al.  Rechargeable batteries with aqueous electrolytes , 2000 .

[4]  Joerg S. Dittrich.  Design and integration of an unmanned aerial vehicle navigation system , 2002 .

[5]  James Larminie,et al.  Fuel Cell Systems Explained: Larminie/Fuel Cell Systems Explained , 2003 .

[6]  John J. C. Kopera.  Inside the Nickel Metal Hydride Battery , 2004 .

[7]  Daniel Weisser,et al.  A guide to life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from electric supply technologies , 2007 .

[8]  W. Dullaert,et al.  Horizontal Cooperation in Transport and Logistics: A Literature Review , 2007, Transportation Journal.

[9]  Paulina J Aramillo,et al.  Comparative life-cycle air emissions of coal, domestic natural gas, LNG, and SNG for electricity generation. , 2007 .

[10]  Robert Spotnitz,et al.  Theoretical evaluation of high-energy lithium metal phosphate cathode materials in Li-ion batteries , 2007 .

[11]  Constantine Samaras,et al.  Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from plug-in hybrid vehicles: implications for policy. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  H. S. Matthews,et al.  Food-miles and the relative climate impacts of food choices in the United States. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Stacy Cagle Davis,et al.  Transportation energy data book , 2008 .

[14]  H. S. Matthews,et al.  Life cycle comparison of traditional retail and e-commerce logistics for electronic products: A case study of buy.com , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology.

[15]  M. Zackrisson,et al.  Life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles – Critical issues , 2010 .

[16]  C. Weber,et al.  The Energy and Climate Change Implications of Different Music Delivery Methods , 2010 .

[17]  Dominic A. Notter,et al.  Contribution of Li-ion batteries to the environmental impact of electric vehicles. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  Paulina Jaramillo,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment and Grid Electricity , 2010 .

[19]  A. Hawkes.  Estimating marginal CO2 emissions rates for national electricity systems , 2010 .

[20]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Valuation of plug-in vehicle life-cycle air emissions and oil displacement benefits , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Life cycle assessment of electricity transmission and distribution—part 2: transformers and substation equipment , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[22]  Murray Edington,et al.  An automotive on-board 3.3 kW battery charger for PHEV application , 2011, 2011 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference.

[23]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Life cycle assessment of electricity transmission and distribution—part 1: power lines and cables , 2011, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[24]  Anders Hammer Strømman,et al.  Life cycle environmental assessment of lithium-ion and nickel metal hydride batteries for plug-in hybrid and battery electric vehicles. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  Thomas J. Schmidt,et al.  Electrocatalysis for Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells: Recent Achievements and Future Challenges , 2012 .

[26]  M Granger Morgan,et al.  Marginal emissions factors for the U.S. electricity system. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[27]  Matthew J. Kotchen,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity of Marginal Emissions: Implications for Electric Cars and Other Electricity-Shifting Policies , 2012 .

[28]  Paulina Jaramillo,et al.  Implications of changing natural gas prices in the United States electricity sector for SO2, NOX and life cycle GHG emissions , 2012 .

[29]  Tom Regier,et al.  An ultrafast nickel–iron battery from strongly coupled inorganic nanoparticle/nanocarbon hybrid materials , 2012, Nature Communications.

[30]  John Sullivan,et al.  Impact of recycling on cradle-to-gate energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of automotive lithium-ion batteries. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[31]  Margaret K. Mann,et al.  Background and Reflections on the Life Cycle Assessment Harmonization Project , 2012 .

[32]  Yang Wang,et al.  Evaluation of a rapid LMP-based approach for calculating marginal unit emissions , 2013 .

[33]  J. Winebrake,et al.  Freight Transportation Demand: Energy-Efficient Scenarios for a Low-Carbon Future , 2013 .

[34]  Roberto Turconi,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) of electricity generation technologies: Overview, comparability and limitations , 2013 .

[35]  Troy R. Hawkins,et al.  Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Vehicles , 2013 .

[36]  Paul E. I. Pounds,et al.  Towards a more efficient quadrotor configuration , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[37]  Xudong Cheng,et al.  The Optimal Placement of Sensors in Square Target Regions with Varying Boundary Length , 2013 .

[38]  Jay Apt,et al.  Regional variations in the health, environmental, and climate benefits of wind and solar generation , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  G. Heath,et al.  Harmonization of initial estimates of shale gas life cycle greenhouse gas emissions for electric power generation , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  Joseph F. Parker,et al.  Wiring zinc in three dimensions re-writes battery performance—dendrite-free cycling , 2014 .

[41]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Integrated life-cycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms global environmental benefit of low-carbon technologies , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Ping He,et al.  Core-shell-structured CNT@RuO(2) composite as a high-performance cathode catalyst for rechargeable Li-O(2) batteries. , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[43]  Julian D Marshall,et al.  Life cycle air quality impacts of conventional and alternative light-duty transportation in the United States , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Steven J. Davis,et al.  Drivers of the US CO2 emissions 1997–2013 , 2015, Nature Communications.

[45]  Paulina Jaramillo,et al.  Comparison of life cycle greenhouse gases from natural gas pathways for medium and heavy-duty vehicles. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[46]  Oar,et al.  Emissions & Generation Resource Integrated Database (eGRID) , 2015 .

[47]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Regional Variability and Uncertainty of Electric Vehicle Life Cycle CO₂ Emissions across the United States. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[48]  W. M. Griffin,et al.  Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from U.S. liquefied natural gas exports: implications for end uses. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[49]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Science, technology and the future of small autonomous drones , 2015, Nature.

[50]  Gregory A Keoleian,et al.  Comparative Assessment of Models and Methods To Calculate Grid Electricity Emissions. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[51]  J. Gagné.  Literature Review , 2018, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.