Beneficial land use change: Strategic expansion of new biomass plantations can reduce environmental impacts from EU agriculture

Society faces the double challenge of increasing biomass production to meet the future demands for food, materials and bioenergy, while addressing negative impacts of current (and future) land use. In the discourse, land use change (LUC) has often been considered as negative, referring to impacts of deforestation and expansion of biomass plantations. However, strategic establishment of suitable perennial production systems in agricultural landscapes can mitigate environmental impacts of current crop production, while providing biomass for the bioeconomy. Here, we explore the potential for such “beneficial LUC” in EU28. First, we map and quantify the degree of accumulated soil organic carbon losses, soil loss by wind and water erosion, nitrogen emissions to water, and recurring floods, in ∼81.000 individual landscapes in EU28. We then estimate the effectiveness in mitigating these impacts through establishment of perennial plants, in each landscape. The results indicate that there is a substantial potential for effective impact mitigation. Depending on criteria selection, 10–46% of the land used for annual crop production in EU28 is located in landscapes that could be considered priority areas for beneficial LUC. These areas are scattered all over Europe, but there are notable “hot-spots” where priority areas are concentrated, e.g., large parts of Denmark, western UK, The Po valley in Italy, and the Danube basin. While some policy developments support beneficial LUC, implementation could benefit from attempts to realize synergies between different Sustainable Development Goals, e.g., “Zero hunger”, “Clean water and sanitation”, “Affordable and Clean Energy”, “Climate Action”, and “Life on Land”.

[1]  P. Lærke,et al.  Nitrogen balances of innovative cropping systems for feedstock production to future biorefineries. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  Pete Smith,et al.  Bioenergy in the IPCC Assessments , 2018 .

[3]  P. Lærke,et al.  Crude protein yield and theoretical extractable true protein of potential biorefinery feedstocks , 2018 .

[4]  G. Berndes,et al.  Lignocellulosic Crops in Agricultural Landscapes: Production systems for biomass and other environmental benefits – examples, incentives, and barriers , 2018 .

[5]  Matteo Negri,et al.  Introducing perennial biomass crops into agricultural landscapes to address water quality challenges and provide other environmental services , 2018 .

[6]  N. Droste,et al.  Green, circular, bio economy: A comparative analysis of sustainability avenues , 2017 .

[7]  John L. Field,et al.  Consensus, uncertainties and challenges for perennial bioenergy crops and land use , 2017, Global change biology. Bioenergy.

[8]  J. Olesen,et al.  Possibilities for near-term bioenergy production and GHG-mitigation through sustainable intensification of agriculture and forestry in Denmark , 2017 .

[9]  Julian F. Cacho,et al.  Yield and Water Quality Impacts of Field-Scale Integration of Willow into a Continuous Corn Rotation System. , 2017, Journal of environmental quality.

[10]  P. Lærke,et al.  Biomass productivity and radiation utilisation of innovative cropping systems for biorefinery , 2017 .

[11]  Göran Berndes,et al.  How to analyse ecosystem services in landscapes—A systematic review , 2017 .

[12]  G. Busch A spatial explicit scenario method to support participative regional land-use decisions regarding economic and ecological options of short rotation coppice (SRC) for renewable energy production on arable land: case study application for the Göttingen district, Germany , 2017 .

[13]  Stefano Amaducci,et al.  Impacts of willow and miscanthus bioenergy buffers on biogeochemical N removal processes along the soil–groundwater continuum , 2017 .

[14]  L. Montanarella,et al.  A New Assessment of Soil Loss Due to Wind Erosion in European Agricultural Soils Using a Quantitative Spatially Distributed Modelling Approach , 2017 .

[15]  J. Dauber,et al.  To integrate or to segregate food crop and energy crop cultivation at the landscape scale? Perspectives on biodiversity conservation in agriculture in Europe , 2016 .

[16]  Herbert Ssegane,et al.  An Integrated Landscape Designed for Commodity and Bioenergy Crops for a Tile-Drained Agricultural Watershed. , 2016, Journal of environmental quality.

[17]  Panos Panagos,et al.  Soil Conservation in Europe: Wish or Reality? , 2016 .

[18]  J. Dauber,et al.  Climate regulation, energy provisioning and water purification: Quantifying ecosystem service delivery of bioenergy willow grown on riparian buffer zones using life cycle assessment , 2016, Ambio.

[19]  John Boardman,et al.  The new assessment of soil loss by water erosion in Europe. Panagos P. et al., 2015 Environmental Science & Policy 54, 438–447—A response , 2016 .

[20]  Pete Smith,et al.  Bioenergy production and sustainable development: science base for policymaking remains limited , 2016, Global change biology. Bioenergy.

[21]  Panos Panagos,et al.  The new assessment of soil loss by water erosion in Europe , 2015 .

[22]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment , 2015 .

[23]  Herbert Ssegane,et al.  Multifunctional landscapes: Site characterization and field-scale design to incorporate biomass production into an agricultural system , 2015 .

[24]  N. Scarlat,et al.  The role of biomass and bioenergy in a future bioeconomy: Policies and facts , 2015 .

[25]  Gail Taylor,et al.  Potential impacts on ecosystem services of land use transitions to second‐generation bioenergy crops in GB , 2015, Global change biology. Bioenergy.

[26]  Gail Taylor,et al.  A synthesis of the ecosystem services impact of second generation bioenergy crop production , 2015 .

[27]  Julian M. Alston,et al.  Agriculture in the Global Economy , 2014 .

[28]  Panos Panagos,et al.  Potential carbon sequestration of European arable soils estimated by modelling a comprehensive set of management practices , 2014, Global change biology.

[29]  P. Bates,et al.  Advances in pan‐European flood hazard mapping , 2014 .

[30]  P. Sutton,et al.  Changes in the global value of ecosystem services , 2014 .

[31]  Robert Gross,et al.  Global bioenergy resources , 2014 .

[32]  Panos Panagos,et al.  A new baseline of organic carbon stock in European agricultural soils using a modelling approach , 2014, Global change biology.

[33]  Tommy Dalgaard,et al.  Buffers for biomass production in temperate European agriculture: A review and synthesis on function, ecosystem services and implementation , 2013 .

[34]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  How much land‐based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals? , 2013, Global change biology.

[35]  Göran Berndes,et al.  Bioenergy and land use change—state of the art , 2013 .

[36]  M. Helmers,et al.  Targeting Perennial Vegetation in Agricultural Landscapes for Enhancing Ecosystem Services , 2022 .

[37]  Fayçal Bouraoui,et al.  Changes of nitrogen and phosphorus loads to European seas , 2012 .

[38]  Göran Berndes,et al.  Slow expansion and low yields of willow short rotation coppice in Sweden; implications for future strategies , 2011 .

[39]  Gerd Sparovek,et al.  Integrating bioenergy and food production—A case study of combined ethanol and dairy production in Pontal, Brazil , 2011 .

[40]  A. Power Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  F. Chapin,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity , 2009 .

[42]  V. Dale,et al.  Biofuels: Effects on Land and Fire , 2008, Science.

[43]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[44]  Stina Gustafsson,et al.  Sugarcane ethanol production in Brazil: an expansion model sensitive to socioeconomic and environmental concerns , 2007 .

[45]  Lukas H. Meyer,et al.  Summary for Policymakers , 2022, The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate.

[46]  Göran Berndes,et al.  The prospects for willow plantations for wastewater treatment in Sweden , 2006 .

[47]  Göran Berndes,et al.  Cadmium accumulation and Salix-based phytoextraction on arable land in Sweden , 2004 .

[48]  Göran Berndes,et al.  The contribution of biomass in the future global energy supply: a review of 17 studies , 2003 .

[49]  Ali Saleh,et al.  RWEQ: improved wind erosion technology. , 2000 .

[50]  P. Börjesson Environmental effects of energy crop cultivation in Sweden—I: Identification and quantification , 1999 .

[51]  Pål Börjesson,et al.  Environmental effects of energy crop cultivation in Sweden—II: Economic valuation , 1999 .

[52]  David C. Ditsch,et al.  A review of soil erosion potential associated with biomass crops , 1998 .

[53]  D. F. Grigal,et al.  Soil carbon changes associated with short-rotation systems , 1998 .

[54]  A. V. Amstel,et al.  The land cover and carbon cycle consequences of large-scale utilizations of biomass as an energy source , 1996 .

[55]  W. Parton,et al.  Dynamics of C, N, P and S in grassland soils: a model , 1988 .

[56]  L. Gustafsson Plant conservation aspects of energy forestry - a new type of land use in Sweden. , 1987 .

[57]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[58]  V. Masson‐Delmotte,et al.  Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems , 2019 .

[59]  Agriculture in Europe , 2018 .

[60]  Christos V. Gortsos,et al.  REGULATION (EU) No 1022/2013 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL , 2015 .

[61]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  High resolution 3D mapping of soil organic carbon in a heterogeneous agricultural landscape , 2014 .

[62]  L. Clarke,et al.  Assessing Transformation Pathways , 2014 .

[63]  Göran Berndes,et al.  Multifunctional biomass production systems –an overview with presentation of specific applications in India and Sweden , 2008 .

[64]  H. Cesar,et al.  ECONOMIC VALUATION , 2005 .

[65]  K. Perttu,et al.  Salix vegetation filters for purification of waters and soils , 1997 .

[66]  G. Göransson Bird fauna of cultivated energy shrub forests at different heights , 1994 .

[67]  W. Vries,et al.  Differences in precipitation excess and nitrogen leaching from agricultural lands and forest plantations , 1994 .

[68]  JoAnn M. Hanowski,et al.  Perspectives on biomass energy tree plantations and changes in habitat for biological organisms , 1994 .

[69]  Arthur S. Lieberman,et al.  Landscape Ecology , 1994, Springer New York.

[70]  M. Turner,et al.  LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY : The Effect of Pattern on Process 1 , 2002 .

[71]  G. Bennett,et al.  The assessment. , 1989, Health visitor.