How high is visual short-term memory capacity for object layout?

Previous research measuring visual short-term memory (VSTM) suggests that the capacity for representing the layout of objects is fairly high. In four experiments, we further explored the capacity of VSTM for layout of objects, using the change detection method. In Experiment 1, participants retained most of the elements in displays of 4 to 8 elements. In Experiments 2 and 3, with up to 20 elements, participants retained many of them, reaching a capacity of 13.4 stimulus elements. In Experiment 4, participants retained much of a complex naturalistic scene. In most cases, increasing display size caused only modest reductions in performance, consistent with the idea of configural, variable-resolution grouping. The results indicate that participants can retain a substantial amount of scene layout information (objects and locations) in short-term memory. We propose that this is a case of remote visual understanding, where observers’ ability to integrate information from a scene is paramount.

[1]  G E Legge,et al.  Color improves object recognition in normal and low vision. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Ingrid R Olson,et al.  Remembering “what” brings along “where” in visual working memory , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  David E. Irwin Information integration across saccadic eye movements , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  Ronald A. Rensink Visual Search for Change: A Probe into the Nature of Attentional Processing , 2000 .

[5]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Solving the "real" mysteries of visual perception: the world as an outside memory. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.

[6]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Stimulus-specific processing consequences of pattern goodness , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[7]  Steven J. Luck,et al.  Visual short term memory , 2007, Scholarpedia.

[8]  W. A. Phillips On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory , 1974 .

[9]  S. Luck,et al.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory , 2008, Nature.

[10]  A. Hollingworth Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  G. Woodman,et al.  Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  D. Fitzpatrick,et al.  The contribution of sensory experience to the maturation of orientation selectivity in ferret visual cortex , 2001, Nature.

[13]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[14]  James T. Enns,et al.  A developmental look at pattern symmetry in perception and memory , 1987 .

[15]  D. Simons In Sight, Out of Mind: When Object Representations Fail , 1996 .

[16]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[17]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[18]  Hing Yee Eng,et al.  Visual working memory for simple and complex visual stimuli. , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  The relationship between online visual representation of a scene and long-term scene memory. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  Thomas Sanocki,et al.  Constructing structural descriptions , 1999 .

[21]  H. Intraub The representation of visual scenes , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  M. Braunstein,et al.  Distance perception from motion parallax and ground contact , 2005 .

[23]  H Pashler,et al.  Familiarity and visual change detection , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  Ronald A. Rensink The Dynamic Representation of Scenes , 2000 .

[25]  David Melcher,et al.  Accumulation and persistence of memory for natural scenes. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[26]  Melvyn A Goodale,et al.  Action Rules: Why the Visual Control of Reaching and Grasping is Not Always Influenced by Perceptual Illusions , 2008, Perception.

[27]  M. Chun,et al.  Organization of visual short-term memory. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  E. Vogel,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Visual Working Memory Represents a Fixed Number of Items Regardless of Complexity , 2022 .

[29]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Judging Egocentric Distance on the Ground: Occlusion and Surface Integration , 2004, Perception.

[30]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  The role of visual short-term memory in empty cell localization , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  The role of global layout in visual short-term memory , 2006 .

[32]  Thomas Sanocki,et al.  Representations of scene layout can consist of independent, functional pieces , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  Yuhong Jiang,et al.  Visual working memory for briefly presented scenes. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[34]  G. Alvarez,et al.  How many locations can be selected at once? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  David Melcher,et al.  Persistence of visual memory for scenes , 2001, Nature.

[36]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Temporal integration between visual images and visual percepts. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  Voluntary attention modulates the brightness of overlapping transparent surfaces , 2010 .

[38]  Yehoshua Tsal,et al.  Towards a resolution theory of visual attention. , 1995 .

[39]  M. Tarr,et al.  How Are Different Properties of a Scene Encoded in Visual Memory? , 2000 .

[40]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Eye movements and scene perception: Memory for things observed , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  Thomas Sanocki,et al.  Priming of simple and complex scene layout: rapid function from the intermediate level. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  G. Bower,et al.  THE PSYCHOLOGY OF LEARNING AND M·OTIVATION , 2001 .

[43]  J. Grimes On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. , 1996 .

[44]  A. Hollingworth Object-position binding in visual memory for natural scenes and object arrays. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  Thomas Sanocki,et al.  Representation and perception of scenic layout , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[46]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Contextual Priming for Object Detection , 2003, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[47]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Postattentive vision. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  Catherine Tallon-Baudry,et al.  Relational information in visual short-term memory: the structural gist. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[49]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Effect of line orientation on various information-processing tasks. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[50]  W. Davis The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 2012 .

[51]  S. Palmer,et al.  Grounding the figure: Surface attachment influences figure-ground organization , 2006, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[52]  A. Hollingworth Constructing visual representations of natural scenes: the roles of short- and long-term visual memory. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Capacity of Visual Short-Term Memory is Set Both by Visual Information Load and by Number of Objects , 2004, Psychological science.