Efficient Strategy Adaptation for Complex Multi-times Bilateral Negotiations

Bilateral multi-issue closed negotiation is an important class for real-life negotiations. Usually, negotiation problems have constraints such as a complex and unknown opponent's utility in real time, or time discounting. In the class of negotiation with some constraints, the effective automated negotiation agents can adjust their behavior depending on the characteristics of their opponents and negotiation scenarios. Recently, the attention of this study has focused on the interleaving learning with negotiation strategies from the past negotiation sessions. By analyzing the past negotiation sessions, agents can estimate the opponent's utility function based on exchanging bids. In this paper, we propose an automated agent that estimates the opponent's strategies based on the past negotiation sessions. Our agent tries to compromise to the estimated maximum utility of the opponent by the end of the negotiation. In addition, our agent can adjust the speed of compromise by judging the opponent's Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode and search for the pareto frontier using past negotiation sessions. In the experiments, we demonstrate that the proposed agent has better outcomes and greater search technique for the pareto frontier than existing agents in the linear and nonlinear utility functions.

[1]  Takayuki Ito,et al.  A Secure and Fair Protocol that Addresses Weaknesses of the Nash Bargaining Solution in Nonlinear Negotiation , 2010 .

[2]  Katsuhide Fujita Automated strategy adaptation for multi-times bilateral closed negotiations , 2014, AAMAS.

[3]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  GENIUS: AN INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENT FOR SUPPORTING THE DESIGN OF GENERIC AUTOMATED NEGOTIATORS , 2012, Comput. Intell..

[4]  R. Kilmann,et al.  Developing a Forced-Choice Measure of Conflict-Handling Behavior: The "Mode" Instrument , 1977 .

[5]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Using Gaussian Processes to Optimise Concession in Complex Negotiations against Unknown Opponents , 2011, IJCAI.

[6]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Multi-issue negotiation under time constraints , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[7]  Leigh Thompson Mind and heart of the negotiator, second edition, the , 2000 .

[8]  G. Shell Bargaining for Advantage: Negotiation Strategies for Reasonable People , 1999 .

[9]  Ho-fung Leung,et al.  ABiNeS: An Adaptive Bilateral Negotiating Strategy over Multiple Items , 2012, 2012 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology.

[10]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Evaluating practical negotiating agents: Results and analysis of the 2011 international competition , 2013, Artif. Intell..

[11]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations , 2002, Artif. Intell..

[12]  Katsuhide Fujita,et al.  Compromising Strategy Based on Estimated Maximum Utility for Automated Negotiation Agents Competition (ANAC-10) , 2011, IEA/AIE.

[13]  Gerhard Weiss,et al.  An efficient automated negotiation strategy for complex environments , 2013, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[14]  Karl Shell,et al.  Economic Theory, Econometrics, and Mathematical Economics , 1993 .

[15]  A. Rubinstein A BARGAINING MODEL WITH INCOMPLETE INFORMATION ABOUT TIME PREFERENCES , 1985 .

[16]  Gerhard Weiss,et al.  An Efficient and Adaptive Approach to Negotiation in Complex Environments , 2012, ECAI.

[17]  Koen V. Hindriks,et al.  Accepting optimally in automated negotiation with incomplete information , 2013, AAMAS.

[18]  Chunyan Miao,et al.  A TWO‐STAGE WIN–WIN MULTIATTRIBUTE NEGOTIATION MODEL: OPTIMIZATION AND THEN CONCESSION , 2013, Comput. Intell..

[19]  Dean G. Pruitt,et al.  Trends in the scientific study of negotiation and mediation , 1986 .

[20]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Strategic Negotiation in Multiagent Environments , 2001, Intelligent robots and autonomous agents.

[21]  A. Rubinstein Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model , 1982 .