Tri-stable stimuli reveal interactions among subsequent percepts: Rivalry is biased by perceptual history

In rivalry, constant stimuli allow several interpretations ("percepts"). Percepts are characterized by their probability to occur and by the duration of their dominance. During continuous presentation of bi-stable stimuli, both percept probabilities are trivially 50%. To disentangle the processes triggering a percept from those stabilizing it, we introduce tri-stable stimuli having three percepts. We find the probability and dominance duration of a percept independently adjustable. Percept probabilities and dominance durations show mutual dependencies across several perceptual switches. Consequently, the current perceptual experience depends on perceptual history; therefore, rivalry--even for continuous presentation--is not a memory-less process.

[1]  A. Borsellino,et al.  Reversal time distribution in the perception of visual ambiguous stimuli , 1972, Kybernetik.

[2]  S. Ullman.  The interpretation of structure from motion , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[3]  Edward H Adelson,et al.  The perception of coherent motion in two-dimensional patterns (abstract only) , 1984, COMG.

[4]  M. Ernst.  Learning to integrate arbitrary signals from vision and touch. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[5]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Tactile Rivalry Demonstrated with an Ambiguous Apparent-Motion Quartet , 2008, Current Biology.

[6]  C. Wheatstone.  XVIII. Contributions to the physiology of vision. —Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision , 1962, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[7]  Charles G. Gross,et al.  Pattern recognition mechanisms , 1985 .

[8]  Sarah Walker,et al.  Ultra-rapid categorization requires visual attention: Scenes with multiple foreground objects. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[9]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  Disruption of implicit perceptual memory by intervening neutral stimuli , 2007, Vision Research.

[10]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Suppression wave dynamics: Visual field anisotropies and inducer strength , 2009, Vision Research.

[11]  Jean Lorenceau,et al.  Pupil dynamics during bistable motion perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[12]  C. Koch,et al.  Pupil dilation reflects perceptual selection and predicts subsequent stability in perceptual rivalry , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  P. Walker.  Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations , 1975 .

[14]  Charles Wheatstone.  On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision. , 1962 .

[15]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[16]  L. V. Noorden.  Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences , 1975 .

[17]  M. M. Taylor,et al.  Stochastic processes in reversing figure perception , 1974 .

[18]  W. Wundt.  Die geometrisch-optischen Täuschungen , 1898 .

[19]  H. Wilson,et al.  Dynamics of travelling waves in visual perception , 2001, Nature.

[20]  A. V. van den Berg,et al.  Flash suppression and flash facilitation in binocular rivalry. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[21]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Plaid Motion Rivalry: Correlates with Binocular Rivalry and Positive Mood State , 2006, Perception.

[22]  S. Eure,et al.  Reversible figures and eye-movements. , 1956, The American journal of psychology.

[23]  Cynthia S. Sahm,et al.  Past trials influence perception of ambiguous motion quartets through pattern completion. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Alexander Maier,et al.  Perception of Temporally Interleaved Ambiguous Patterns , 2003, Current Biology.

[25]  R Fox,et al.  Stochastic properties of stabilized-image binocular rivalry alternations. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[26]  E. Adelson,et al.  The analysis of moving visual patterns , 1985 .

[27]  David A. Leopold,et al.  Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  Denise Chen,et al.  Binaral Rivalry between the Nostrils and in the Cortex , 2009, Current Biology.

[29]  Henry Samuel M Hubert.  Part the First , 2019, Antonio Latini’s “The Modern Steward, or The Art of Preparing Banquets Well”.

[30]  Junji Ito,et al.  Perceptual Switching, Eye Movements, and the Bus Paradox , 2003, Perception.

[31]  A. V. van den Berg,et al.  Intermittent ambiguous stimuli: implicit memory causes periodic perceptual alternations. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[32]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Looking ahead: the perceived direction of gaze shifts before the eyes move. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[33]  Hans Wallach.  Über visuell wahrgenommene Bewegungsrichtung , 1935 .

[34]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[35]  L. A. N. Esq.,et al.  LXI. Observations on some remarkable optical phænomena seen in Switzerland; and on an optical phænomenon which occurs on viewing a figure of a crystal or geometrical solid , 1832 .

[36]  Robert Fox,et al.  Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations , 1967 .

[37]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[38]  Marcia Grabowecky,et al.  Evidence for Perceptual “Trapping” and Adaptation in Multistable Binocular Rivalry , 2002, Neuron.

[39]  T. J. D. Boer.  Über umkehrbare Zeichnungen , 1910 .

[40]  R. van Ee,et al.  Percept-choice sequences driven by interrupted ambiguous stimuli: a low-level neural model. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[41]  Peter König,et al.  Are switches in perception of the Necker cube related to eye position? , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[42]  M. Grabowecky,et al.  Long-Term Speeding in Perceptual Switches Mediated by Attention-Dependent Plasticity in Cortical Visual Processing , 2007, Neuron.

[43]  Charles Wheatstone,et al.  Contributions to the Physiology of Vision. , 1837 .

[44]  J. Movshon,et al.  Selectivity for orientation and direction of motion of single neurons in cat striate and extrastriate visual cortex. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  A. V. van den Berg,et al.  Multi-Timescale Perceptual History Resolves Visual Ambiguity , 2008, PloS one.

[46]  C. Clifford,et al.  Mechanisms selectively engaged in rivalry: normal vision habituates, rivalrous vision primes , 2005, Vision Research.

[47]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Visual competition , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[48]  Raymond van Ee,et al.  The role of (micro)saccades and blinks in perceptual bi-stability from slant rivalry , 2005, Vision Research.

[49]  Raymond van Ee,et al.  Distributions of alternation rates in various forms of bistable perception. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[50]  D. Purves,et al.  Similarities in normal and binocularly rivalrous viewing. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  J. Orbach,et al.  Reversibility of the Necker Cube: III. Effects of Interpolation on Reversal Rate of the Cube Presented Repetitively , 1963, Perceptual and motor skills.

[52]  S. R. Lehky.  An Astable Multivibrator Model of Binocular Rivalry , 1988, Perception.

[53]  W J Levelt,et al.  Note on the distribution of dominance times in binocular rivalry. , 1967, British journal of psychology.

[54]  Eure Sp,et al.  Reversible figures and eye-movements. , 1956 .

[55]  Raymond van Ee,et al.  The role of saccades in exerting voluntary control in perceptual and binocular rivalry , 2006, Vision Research.

[56]  N. Rubin,et al.  Dynamics of perceptual bi-stability : plaids and binocular rivalry compared , 2003 .

[57]  H. Schröder,et al.  Ueber eine optische Inversion bei Betrachtung verkehrter, durch optische Vorrichtung entworfener, physischer Bilder , 1858 .

[58]  R. Blake,et al.  Stimulus Motion Propels Traveling Waves in Binocular Rivalry , 2007, PloS one.

[59]  J. Hupé,et al.  Temporal Dynamics of Auditory and Visual Bistability Reveal Common Principles of Perceptual Organization , 2006, Current Biology.

[60]  David Alais,et al.  Monocular rivalry exhibits three hallmarks of binocular rivalry: Evidence for common processes , 2009, Vision Research.

[61]  Alexander Pastukhov,et al.  A short-term memory of multi-stable perception. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[62]  E. Boring.  A new ambiguous figure. , 1930 .

[63]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[64]  Raymond van Ee,et al.  Stochastic variations in sensory awareness are driven by noisy neuronal adaptation: evidence from serial correlations in perceptual bistability. , 2009, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[65]  D. Ellson.  Successive Extinctions of a Bar-Pressing Response in Rats , 1940 .

[66]  R. Blake.  A neural theory of binocular rivalry. , 1989, Psychological review.

[67]  R. M. Warren,et al.  An auditory analogue of the visual reversible figure. , 1958, The American journal of psychology.

[68]  F. Attneave.  Multistability in perception. , 1971, Scientific American.

[69]  Gregory Burton.  Successor states in a four-state ambiguous figure , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[70]  J. Orbach,et al.  Reversibility of the Necker Cube: I. An Examination of the Concept of “Satiation of Orientation” , 1963, Perceptual and motor skills.