Transient Analysis of Semi—Markov Reliability Models — A Tutorial Review with Emphasis on Discrete—Parameter Approaches

Semi—Markov models can be usefully employed for the analysis of various reliability and performance characteristics of technical systems. We consider semi—Markov dependability models of systems whose finite state space S is partitioned into the set of up states u, the set of repairable down states D, and a state ω, standing for irrecoverable system failure: S = u ∪ D ∪ {ω}. A great number of reliability and performance measures for such models are examined in this chapter. It is discussed how these measures can be obtained as solutions of certain systems of integral equations if the modelling process has a continuous time parameter. The discrete parameter framework is discussed separately in more detail, since, even though it is subsumed within the continuous parameter case, it deserves special attention for three reasons. First, in some applications, discrete—time modelling is appropriate. Second, discrete—time models can be used for approximately analysing continuous—time models. Finally, for discrete—time models, the computational solution is technically less involved and it will thus be more accessible for even the mathematically less sophisticated analyst. We also present a framework within which many of the measures will be seen to admit of a formal closed form solution.

[1]  J. Vlach,et al.  Computation of time domain response by numerical inversion of the Laplace transform , 1975 .

[2]  L. Delves,et al.  Numerical solution of integral equations , 1975 .

[3]  G. V. Kulkarni,et al.  The Completion Time of a Job on Multi-Mode Systems , 1985 .

[4]  Derek Ray,et al.  A Primer of Reliability Theory , 1990 .

[5]  On a counting variable in the theory of discrete-parameter Markov chains , 1993 .

[6]  Odd O. Aalen,et al.  Phase type distributions in survival analysis , 2005 .

[7]  Bong Dae Choi,et al.  The M/G/1 Retrial Queue With Retrial Rate Control Policy , 1993, Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences.

[8]  I. M. Longman On the Numerical Inversion of the Laplace Transform of a Discontinuous Original , 1968 .

[9]  M. C. van der Heijden Interval Availability Distribution for A 1-out-of-2 Reliability System with Repair , 1987 .

[10]  Nikolaos Limnios Dependability analysis of semi-Markov systems , 1997 .

[11]  R. Bellman,et al.  A NUMERICAL INVERSION OF THE LAPLACE TRANSFORM , 1963 .

[12]  Attila Csenki Total cumulative work until failure of a system modelled by a finite semi-Markov process , 1995 .

[13]  Almerico Murli,et al.  Algorithm 662: A Fortran software package for the numerical inversion of the Laplace transform based on Weeks' method , 1988, TOMS.

[14]  Singiresu S Rao,et al.  Reliability-Based Design , 1992 .

[15]  Attila Csenki,et al.  Dependability for Systems with a Partitioned State Space: Markov and Semi-Markov Theory and Computational Implementation , 1994 .

[16]  D. Sculli,et al.  Power plant boiler feed system reliability: a case study , 1993 .

[17]  Ushio Sumita,et al.  A multivariate reward process defined on a semi-Markov process and its first-passage-time distributions , 1991, Journal of Applied Probability.

[18]  Gerardo Rubino,et al.  Sojourn times in semi-Markov reward processes: application to fault-tolerant systems modeling , 1993 .

[19]  N. Limnios,et al.  Non‐parametric estimation for semi‐Markov kernels with application to reliability analysis , 1996 .

[20]  A. Ahmad,et al.  Efficient inverse Laplace transform algorithm for transient overvoltage calculation , 1992 .

[21]  D. Widder,et al.  The Laplace Transform , 1943, The Mathematical Gazette.

[22]  Laurence A. Baxter Compound availability measures , 1982 .

[23]  Kishor S. Trivedi,et al.  Composite Performance and Dependability Analysis , 1992, Perform. Evaluation.

[24]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Applied reliability assessment in electric power systems , 1991 .

[25]  L. Baxter AVAILABILITY MEASURES FOR A TWO-STATE SYSTEM , 1981 .

[26]  David J Smith,et al.  Reliability, Maintainability and Risk: Practical Methods for Engineers , 1993 .

[27]  Peter Linz,et al.  Analytical and numerical methods for Volterra equations , 1985, SIAM studies in applied and numerical mathematics.

[28]  Attila Csenki The number of working periods of a repairable Markov system during a finite time interval , 1994 .

[29]  Attila Csenki Joint availability of systems modelled by finite semi–markov processes , 1994 .

[30]  D. Gupta,et al.  Performance modelling and evaluation of flexible manufacturing systems using a semi-Markov approach , 1989 .

[31]  Bruno Sericola,et al.  Performability Analysis Using Semi-Markov Reard Processes , 1990, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[32]  Jürg Kohlas,et al.  Stochastic Methods of Operations Research , 1983 .

[33]  Nam Zin Cho,et al.  A semi-Markov reliability analysis of alternating systems , 1989 .

[34]  Y. Masuda,et al.  A COMPOUND DEPENDABILITY MEASURE ARISING FROM SEMI-MARKOV RELIABILITY MODEL , 2004 .

[35]  Jürg Kohlas,et al.  Zuverlässigkeit und Verfügbarkeit , 1987 .

[36]  Attila Csenki Transient analysis of interval availability for repairable systems modelled by finite semi-Markov processes , 1995 .

[37]  M. E. Woodward,et al.  Communication and computer networks - modelling with discrete-time queues , 1993 .

[38]  R. Islamov Using Markov reliability modelling for multiple repairable systems , 1994 .

[39]  Herwig Bruneel,et al.  Performance of discrete-time queueing systems , 1993, Comput. Oper. Res..

[40]  A. Csenki The joint distribution of sojourn times in finite semi-Markov processes , 1991 .

[41]  C. Sundararajan,et al.  Guide to Reliability Engineering: Data, Analysis, Applications, Implementation, and Management , 1991 .

[42]  Christian Landrault,et al.  Parametric Analysis of 2-Unit Redundant Computer Systems With Corrective and Preventive Maintenance , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[43]  Christoph Herrmann A Performance Model for Statistical Multiplexing of correlated ATM Traffic Superpositions , 1993, MMB.

[44]  Attila Csenki,et al.  A new approach to the cumulative operational time for semi-Markov models of repairable systems , 1996 .

[45]  Volker Nollau Semi-Markovsche Prozesse , 1980 .

[46]  Kishor S. Trivedi,et al.  Performability Modeling Based on Real Data: A Case Study , 1988, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[47]  A. Goyal,et al.  A Measure of Guaranteed Availability and its Numerical Evaluation , 1988, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[48]  D. Jagerman An inversion technique for the laplace transform with Application to approximation , 1978, The Bell System Technical Journal.

[49]  F. Durbin,et al.  Numerical Inversion of Laplace Transforms: An Efficient Improvement to Dubner and Abate's Method , 1974, Comput. J..

[50]  Attila Csenki Mission Availability For Repairable Semi-Markov Systems: Analytical Results And Computational Implementation , 1995 .

[51]  Frank Ball,et al.  Numerical evaluation of observed sojourn time distributions for a single ion channel incorporating time interval omission , 1994 .

[52]  William Feller,et al.  An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications , 1951 .

[53]  L. R. Goel,et al.  Analysis of a two-unit cold standby redundant system with allowed down-time , 1982 .

[54]  Attila Csenki The joint distribution of sojourn times in finite Markov processes , 1992, Advances in Applied Probability.

[55]  Attila Csenki Cumulative operational time analysis of finite semi-Markov reliability nodels , 1994 .

[56]  Shunji Osaki,et al.  Applied stochastic system modeling , 1985 .

[58]  L. Delves,et al.  Computational methods for integral equations: Frontmatter , 1985 .

[59]  P. K. Kapur,et al.  Availability measures for an intermittently used repairable system , 1983 .

[60]  Attila Csenki Occupation frequencies for irreducible finite semi-markov processes with reliability applications , 1993, Comput. Oper. Res..

[61]  Attila Csenki Some renewal-theoretic investigations in the theory of sojourn times in finite semi-Markov processes , 1991 .

[62]  W. Preuss,et al.  On a Simple Numerical Method for Computing Stieltjes Integrals in Reliability Theory , 1991 .

[63]  Gerardo Rubino,et al.  Interval Availability Analysis Using Operational Periods , 1992, Perform. Evaluation.

[64]  Jos H. A. de Smit,et al.  Semi-Markoff-Prozesse mit endlich vielen Zuständen , 1970 .

[65]  Kishor S. Trivedi,et al.  Performability Analysis: Measures, an Algorithm, and a Case Study , 1988, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[66]  S. Garribba,et al.  RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF A REPAIRABLE SINGLE UNIT UNDER GENERAL AGE-DEPENDENCE , 1980 .

[67]  D. Jagerman An inversion technique for the Laplace transform , 1982, The Bell System Technical Journal.

[68]  Edmundo de Souza e Silva,et al.  Calculating Cumulative Operational Time Distributions of Repairable Computer Systems , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[69]  William T. Weeks,et al.  Numerical Inversion of Laplace Transforms Using Laguerre Functions , 1966, JACM.

[70]  N. Limnios,et al.  Ph-Distribution Method for Reliability Evaluation of Semi-Markov Systems , 1997 .

[71]  D. P. Gaver,et al.  Observing Stochastic Processes, and Approximate Transform Inversion , 1966, Oper. Res..

[72]  J. H. Naylor,et al.  System Reliability Modelling and Evaluation , 1977 .

[73]  Elmer E Lewis,et al.  Introduction To Reliability Engineering , 1987 .

[74]  Ushio Sumita,et al.  Analysis of a counting process associated with a semi-Markov process: number of entries into a subset of state space , 1987, Advances in Applied Probability.

[75]  Almerico Murli,et al.  Software for an implementation of Weeks' method for the inverse Laplace transform , 1988, TOMS.

[76]  A. Csenki On the interval reliability of systems modelled by finite semi-Markov processes , 1994 .

[77]  Attila Csenki A compound measure of dependability for systems modeled by continuous-time absorbing Markov processes , 1996 .

[78]  T. Nakagawa,et al.  The Discrete Weibull Distribution , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[79]  F. Ball,et al.  Clustering of Bursts of Openings in Markov and Semi-Markov Models of Single Channel Gating , 1997, Advances in Applied Probability.

[80]  Henk Tijms,et al.  Stochastic modelling and analysis: a computational approach , 1986 .

[81]  H. Kunzi,et al.  Lectu re Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems , 1975 .

[82]  Charles J. Mode,et al.  Computational Methods for Renewal Theory and Semi-Markov Processes with Illustrative Examples , 1988 .

[83]  尾崎 俊治 Stochastic system reliability modeling , 1985 .

[84]  J. Medhi,et al.  Stochastic Processes , 1982 .

[85]  R. Natarajan,et al.  Some general measures for a complex n-unit standby redundant system , 1986 .

[86]  Edmundo de Souza e Silva,et al.  Performability Analysis of Computer Systems: From Model Spacification to Solution , 1992, Perform. Evaluation.

[87]  A. Talbot The Accurate Numerical Inversion of Laplace Transforms , 1979 .

[88]  Michael Beasley,et al.  Reliability for Engineers , 1991 .

[89]  J. Janssen Semi-Markov Models: Theory and Applications , 1999 .

[90]  Attila Csenki,et al.  An integral equation approach to the interval reliability of systems modelled by finite semi-Markov processes , 1995 .

[91]  Harvey Dubner,et al.  Numerical Inversion of Laplace Transforms by Relating Them to the Finite Fourier Cosine Transform , 1968, JACM.

[92]  Alessandro Birolini,et al.  On the Use of Stochastic Processes in Modeling Reliability Problems , 1985 .

[93]  U. Sumita,et al.  Dynamic Performance Evaluation of Communication/Computer Systems with Highly Reliable Components , 1988, Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences.

[94]  Charles J. Mode,et al.  Stochastic Processes in Demography and Their Computer Implementation , 1985 .

[95]  B. Sericola Closed form solution for the distribution of the total time spent in a subset of states of a homogeneous Markov process during a finite observation period , 1990 .

[96]  Kenny S. Crump,et al.  Numerical Inversion of Laplace Transforms Using a Fourier Series Approximation , 1976, J. ACM.

[97]  Nikolaos Limnios,et al.  Performability of electric-power systems modeled by non-homogeneous Markov chains , 1996, IEEE Trans. Reliab..