Low‐Cloud Feedback in CAM5‐CLUBB: Physical Mechanisms and Parameter Sensitivity Analysis

The physical mechanism of low‐cloud feedbacks is examined by using perturbed‐parameter ensemble experiments in a unified scheme of boundary layer turbulence and shallow convection, named Cloud Layers Unified by Binormals (CLUBB) coupled to Community Atmosphere Model version 5 (CAM5). The shortwave cloud feedbacks in CAM5‐CLUBB are positive in the most stable tropical regime, which is related to the weaker turbulence in the planetary boundary layer (PBL) in a warmer climate that is possibly triggered by the strengthened stability of the cloud layer. The positive feedback between low cloud cover (LCC), cloud top radiative cooling, and PBL turbulent mixing may further enhance the decrease in LCC. The stronger inversion stability of PBL partly counters the decrease in LCC, and a recently developed index, the estimated cloud‐top entrainment index, is a better predictor for LCC changes than conventional stability indices. The relative strength of shallow convection increases in the warmer climate, but its effect on low‐cloud feedback is complicated by the unified treatment of shallow convection and PBL turbulence in CLUBB. Stronger shallow convection means more convective drying but also less PBL turbulence and less LCC in the present climate, which leads to less reduction in LCC. The parameters related to dynamic turbulent structure and double Gaussian closure in CLUBB are the most influential parameters on low‐cloud feedbacks. Our results suggest that a unified treatment of shallow convection and turbulence may give rise to the predominate role of the PBL turbulent mixing in determining low‐cloud feedback.

[1]  N. McFarlane,et al.  Sensitivity of Climate Simulations to the Parameterization of Cumulus Convection in the Canadian Climate Centre General Circulation Model , 1995, Data, Models and Analysis.

[2]  H. Cohen.  Introduction , 2018, Isis.

[3]  M. Webb,et al.  Interactions between Hydrological Sensitivity, Radiative Cooling, Stability, and Low-Level Cloud Amount Feedback , 2017 .

[4]  Vincent E. Larson,et al.  CLUBB-SILHS: A parameterization of subgrid variability in the atmosphere , 2017, 1711.03675.

[5]  M. Webb,et al.  Interpretation of Factors Controlling Low Cloud Cover and Low Cloud Feedback Using a Unified Predictive Index , 2017 .

[6]  M. Zelinka,et al.  Cloud feedback mechanisms and their representation in global climate models , 2017 .

[7]  S. Bony,et al.  Coupling between lower‐tropospheric convective mixing and low‐level clouds: Physical mechanisms and dependence on convection scheme , 2016, Journal of advances in modeling earth systems.

[8]  M. Kimoto,et al.  Lower-Tropospheric Mixing as a Constraint on Cloud Feedback in a Multiparameter Multiphysics Ensemble , 2016 .

[9]  S. Bony,et al.  Shallowness of tropical low clouds as a predictor of climate models’ response to warming , 2016, Climate Dynamics.

[10]  Sarah M. Kang,et al.  The impact of parametrized convection on cloud feedback , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[11]  C. Bretherton.  Insights into low-latitude cloud feedbacks from high-resolution models , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[12]  S. Klein,et al.  Positive tropical marine low‐cloud cover feedback inferred from cloud‐controlling factors , 2015 .

[13]  Richard Neale,et al.  Parametric sensitivity analysis of precipitation at global and local scales in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5 , 2015 .

[14]  S. Ghan,et al.  Parametric behaviors of CLUBB in simulations of low clouds in the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) , 2014 .

[15]  S. Bony,et al.  Influence of low‐cloud radiative effects on tropical circulation and precipitation , 2014 .

[16]  Vincent E. Larson,et al.  A sensitivity analysis of cloud properties to CLUBB parameters in the single‐column Community Atmosphere Model (SCAM5) , 2014 .

[17]  S. Power,et al.  The eastward shift of the Walker Circulation in response to global warming and its relationship to ENSO variability , 2014, Climate Dynamics.

[18]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Low cloud reduction in a greenhouse‐warmed climate: Results from Lagrangian LES of a subtropical marine cloudiness transition , 2014 .

[19]  Ann M. Fridlind,et al.  Intercomparison of large‐eddy simulations of Arctic mixed‐phase clouds: Importance of ice size distribution assumptions , 2014 .

[20]  R. Hemler,et al.  Multivariate probability density functions with dynamics in the GFDL Atmospheric General Circulation Model: Global tests , 2014 .

[21]  S. Bony,et al.  Spread in model climate sensitivity traced to atmospheric convective mixing , 2014, Nature.

[22]  Huan Guo.  Multivariate Probability Density Functions with Dynamics in the GFDL Atmospheric General Circulation Model: Global Tests , 2014 .

[23]  A. P. Siebesma,et al.  CGILS: Results from the first phase of an international project to understand the physical mechanisms of low cloud feedbacks in single column models , 2013 .

[24]  D. P. Schanen,et al.  Higher-Order Turbulence Closure and Its Impact on Climate Simulations in the Community Atmosphere Model , 2013 .

[25]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Mechanisms of marine low cloud sensitivity to idealized climate perturbations: A single‐LES exploration extending the CGILS cases , 2013 .

[26]  S. Bony,et al.  On the interpretation of inter-model spread in CMIP5 climate sensitivity estimates , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[27]  C. Tebaldi,et al.  Long-term Climate Change: Projections, Commitments and Irreversibility , 2013 .

[28]  M. Webb,et al.  Coupling between subtropical cloud feedback and the local hydrological cycle in a climate model , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[29]  Sally A. McFarlane,et al.  Uncertainty quantification and parameter tuning in the CAM5 Zhang‐McFarlane convection scheme and impact of improved convection on the global circulation and climate , 2012 .

[30]  D. P. Schanen,et al.  Unified parameterization of the planetary boundary layer and shallow convection with a higher-order turbulence closure in the Community Atmosphere Model: single-column experiments , 2012 .

[31]  S. Bony,et al.  How may low‐cloud radiative properties simulated in the current climate influence low‐cloud feedbacks under global warming? , 2012 .

[32]  S. Emori,et al.  Using a Multiphysics Ensemble for Exploring Diversity in Cloud–Shortwave Feedback in GCMs , 2012 .

[33]  Vincent E. Larson,et al.  PDF Parameterization of Boundary Layer Clouds in Models with Horizontal Grid Spacings from 2 to 16 km , 2012 .

[34]  G. Vecchi,et al.  The vertical distribution of cloud feedback in coupled ocean‐atmosphere models , 2011 .

[35]  B. Stevens,et al.  Revealing differences in GCM representations of low clouds , 2011 .

[36]  S. Klein,et al.  Global simulations of ice nucleation and ice supersaturation with an improved cloud scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model , 2010 .

[37]  Mark D. Zelinka,et al.  Why is longwave cloud feedback positive , 2010 .

[38]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Subtropical Low Cloud Response to a Warmer Climate in a Superparameterized Climate Model. Part I: Regime Sorting and Physical Mechanisms , 2009 .

[39]  Mrinal K. Sen,et al.  Error Reduction and Convergence in Climate Prediction , 2008 .

[40]  G. Stephens,et al.  Observed vertical structure of tropical oceanic clouds sorted in large‐scale regimes , 2008 .

[41]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Aquaplanets, Climate Sensitivity, and Low Clouds , 2008 .

[42]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  A new two-moment bulk stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model, version 3 (CAM3). Part I: Description and numerical tests , 2008 .

[43]  S. Ghan,et al.  A New Two-Moment Bulk Stratiform Cloud Microphysics Scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model, Version 3 (CAM3). Part II: Single-Column and Global Results , 2008 .

[44]  Brian J. Soden,et al.  Quantifying Climate Feedbacks Using Radiative Kernels , 2008 .

[45]  Vincent E. Larson,et al.  Elucidating Model Inadequacies in a Cloud Parameterization by Use of an Ensemble-Based Calibration Framework , 2007 .

[46]  C. Bretherton,et al.  On the Relationship between Stratiform Low Cloud Cover and Lower-Tropospheric Stability , 2006 .

[47]  I. Musat,et al.  On the contribution of local feedback mechanisms to the range of climate sensitivity in two GCM ensembles , 2006 .

[48]  Kuan-Man Xu,et al.  Simulation of shallow cumuli and their transition to deep convective clouds by cloud‐resolving models with different third‐order turbulence closures , 2006 .

[49]  S. Bony,et al.  Marine boundary layer clouds at the heart of tropical cloud feedback uncertainties in climate models , 2005 .

[50]  V. Larson,et al.  Using Probability Density Functions to Derive Consistent Closure Relationships among Higher-Order Moments , 2005 .

[51]  Anthony J. Broccoli,et al.  On the Use of Cloud Forcing to Estimate Cloud Feedback , 2004 .

[52]  S. Bony,et al.  On dynamic and thermodynamic components of cloud changes , 2004 .

[53]  W. Cotton,et al.  Small-Scale and Mesoscale Variability in Cloudy Boundary Layers: Joint Probability Density Functions , 2002 .

[54]  Vincent E. Larson,et al.  A PDF-Based Model for Boundary Layer Clouds. Part I: Method and Model Description , 2002 .

[55]  Vincent E. Larson,et al.  A PDF-Based Model for Boundary Layer Clouds. Part II: Model Results , 2002 .

[56]  Dennis L. Hartmann,et al.  An important constraint on tropical cloud ‐ climate feedback , 2002 .

[57]  R. Caflisch.  Monte Carlo and quasi-Monte Carlo methods , 1998, Acta Numerica.

[58]  S. Klein,et al.  The Seasonal Cycle of Low Stratiform Clouds , 1993 .

[59]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  Intercomparison and interpretation of climate feedback processes in 19 atmospheric general circulation models , 1990 .

[60]  Z. X. Li,et al.  Interpretation of Cloud-Climate Feedback as Produced by 14 Atmospheric General Circulation Models , 1989, Science.