Reactive Motion Control for an Omnidirectional Mobile Robot

This paper presents the developed practical approach to reactive motion control for the omnidirectional mobile vehicle of the Karlsruhe Autonomous Mobile Robot (KAMRO). The reactive control is based on the ultrasonic sensory information processing and is a supplement to the usual motion control of the vehicle. The geometrical path planner on the base of the environmental model generates global subgoals which define the coarse global path to a goal. To realize the planned motion within an environment where unknown obstacles may occur, the reactive control operates with the introduced preference functions of the vehicle and its global subgoal. The preference functions combined with the processing of sensory information provide the computation of the local subgoals leading the vehicle to its global subgoals or providing an obstacle avoidance. The developed approach is discussed and illustrated by the obtained experimental results.

[1]  Daniel E. Koditschek,et al.  Exact robot navigation using artificial potential functions , 1992, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[2]  Günther Schmidt,et al.  Physical Analogies for Rapid Robot Motion Planning and Execution in Dynamic Environments , 1993, Robotics, Mechatronics and Manufacturing Systems.

[3]  Igor E. Paromtchik,et al.  A practical approach to motion generation and control for an omnidirectional mobile robot , 1994, Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  Penny Probert Smith,et al.  A decision theoretic approach to real-time obstacle avoidance for a mobile robot , 1993, Proceedings of 1993 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS '93).

[5]  Jean-Paul Laumond,et al.  Position referencing and consistent world modeling for mobile robots , 1985, Proceedings. 1985 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  Ulrich Rembold,et al.  Development of an advanced robot for autonomous assembly , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Rüdiger Dillmann,et al.  PRIAMOS: An experimental platform for reflexive navigation , 1993, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[8]  David W. Payton,et al.  Plan guided reaction , 1990, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[9]  Jean-Claude Latombe,et al.  Robot Motion Planning: A Distributed Representation Approach , 1991, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[10]  Tomoyoshi Takeuchi,et al.  Fuzzy control of a mobile robot for obstacle avoidance , 1988, Inf. Sci..

[11]  Yoram Koren,et al.  Real-time obstacle avoidance for fast mobile robots in cluttered environments , 1990, Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[12]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  Real-Time Obstacle Avoidance for Manipulators and Mobile Robots , 1985, Autonomous Robot Vehicles.

[13]  Yoram Koren,et al.  Potential field methods and their inherent limitations for mobile robot navigation , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  Maja J. Mataric,et al.  Integration of representation into goal-driven behavior-based robots , 1992, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[15]  Pradeep K. Khosla,et al.  Real-time obstacle avoidance using harmonic potential functions , 1991, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[16]  Ronald C. Arkin,et al.  Towards the Unification of Navigational Planning and Reactive Control , 1989 .

[17]  R. A. Brooks,et al.  Intelligence without Representation , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[18]  James L. Crowley World modeling and position estimation for a mobile robot using ultrasonic ranging , 1989, Proceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation.