Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration

The fine spatial scales of the structures in the human brain represent an enormous challenge to the successful integration of information from different images for both within- and between-subject analysis. While many algorithms to register image pairs from the same subject exist, visual inspection shows that their accuracy and robustness to be suspect, particularly when there are strong intensity gradients and/or only part of the brain is imaged. This paper introduces a new algorithm called Boundary-Based Registration, or BBR. The novelty of BBR is that it treats the two images very differently. The reference image must be of sufficient resolution and quality to extract surfaces that separate tissue types. The input image is then aligned to the reference by maximizing the intensity gradient across tissue boundaries. Several lower quality images can be aligned through their alignment with the reference. Visual inspection and fMRI results show that BBR is more accurate than correlation ratio or normalized mutual information and is considerably more robust to even strong intensity inhomogeneities. BBR also excels at aligning partial-brain images to whole-brain images, a domain in which existing registration algorithms frequently fail. Even in the limit of registering a single slice, we show the BBR results to be robust and accurate.

[1]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[2]  A M Dale,et al.  Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  B. Biswal,et al.  High‐resolution fMRI using multislice partial k‐space GR‐EPI with cubic voxels , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  P. Jezzard,et al.  Correction for geometric distortion in echo planar images from B0 field variations , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  A. M. Dale,et al.  A hybrid approach to the skull stripping problem in MRI , 2004, NeuroImage.

[6]  Michael S. Beauchamp,et al.  A new method for improving functional-to-structural MRI alignment using local Pearson correlation , 2009, NeuroImage.

[7]  John Law,et al.  Robust Statistics—The Approach Based on Influence Functions , 1986 .

[8]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  High‐resolution FMRI at 1.5T using balanced SSFP , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  Gunilla Borgefors,et al.  Hierarchical Chamfer Matching: A Parametric Edge Matching Algorithm , 1988, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  High‐resolution, spin‐echo BOLD, and CBF fMRI at 4 and 7 T , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Paul Suetens,et al.  Comparative evaluation of multiresolution optimization strategies for multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1999, Medical Image Anal..

[12]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[13]  A. Dale,et al.  High‐resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[14]  David Gavaghan,et al.  Development of a functional magnetic resonance imaging simulator for modeling realistic rigid‐body motion artifacts , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  侯一平 关于神经科学原理(PRINCIPLES OF NEUROSCIENCE)课程的介绍 , 2000 .

[16]  G. Marchal,et al.  Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997 .

[17]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[18]  J W Belliveau,et al.  Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Science.

[19]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[20]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Temporal Autocorrelation in Univariate Linear Modeling of FMRI Data , 2001, NeuroImage.

[21]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  The Correlation Ratio as a New Similarity Measure for Multimodal Image Registration , 1998, MICCAI.

[23]  Ning Xu,et al.  Computer-generated fMRI phantoms with motion-distortion interaction. , 2007, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[24]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[25]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  David C. Van Essen,et al.  Application of Information Technology: An Integrated Software Suite for Surface-based Analyses of Cerebral Cortex , 2001, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[27]  Craig K. Jones,et al.  High‐resolution fMRI investigation of the medial temporal lobe , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[28]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN - The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd Edition , 1987 .

[29]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Retrospective intermodality registration techniques for images of the head: surface-based versus volume-based , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[30]  C. Jennison,et al.  Robust Statistics: The Approach Based on Influence Functions , 1987 .

[31]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Automatic 3‐D model‐based neuroanatomical segmentation , 1995 .