Made to Measure: Ecological Rationality in Structured Environments

A working assumption that processes of natural and cultural evolution have tailored the mind to fit the demands and structure of its environment begs the question: how are we to characterize the structure of cognitive environments? Decision problems faced by real organisms are not like simple multiple-choice examination papers. For example, some individual problems may occur much more frequently than others, whilst some may carry much more weight than others. Such considerations are not taken into account when (i) the performance of candidate cognitive mechanisms is assessed by employing a simple accuracy metric that is insensitive to the structure of the decision-maker's environment, and (ii) reason is defined as the adherence to internalist prescriptions of classical rationality. Here we explore the impact of frequency and significance structure on the performance of a range of candidate decision-making mechanisms. We show that the character of this impact is complex, since structured environments demand that decision-makers trade off general performance against performance on important subsets of test items. As a result, environment structure obviates internalist criteria of rationality. Failing to appreciate the role of environment structure in shaping cognition can lead to mischaracterising adaptive behavior as irrational.

[1]  Elliott Sober.  From a Biological Point of View: Essays in Evolutionary Philosophy , 1994 .

[2]  R. Dawes,et al.  Linear models in decision making. , 1974 .

[3]  J. Kagan,et al.  Rational choice in an uncertain world , 1988 .

[4]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[5]  D. Goldstein,et al.  Betting on one good reason : The Take the Best heuristic , 1999 .

[6]  Barton Childs,et al.  A Biological Point of View. , 1980 .

[7]  P. M. Todd,et al.  How good are fast and frugal inference heuristics in case of limited knowledge? , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  E. Brunswik.  Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. , 1955, Psychological review.

[9]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[10]  Elizabeth C. Hirschman,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[11]  P. Laplace.  A Philosophical Essay On Probabilities , 1902 .

[12]  Barbara Webb,et al.  Robotic experiments in cricket phonotaxis , 1994 .

[13]  F. Schick.  Dutch Bookies and Money Pumps , 1986 .

[14]  P. Todd,et al.  From pride and prejudice to persuasion : Satisficing in mate search , 1999 .

[15]  Inman Harvey,et al.  Explorations in Evolutionary Robotics , 1993, Adapt. Behav..

[16]  R. Kirk.  Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories , 1985 .

[17]  J. Shanteau.  How much information does an expert use? Is it relevant? , 1992 .

[18]  A. Tversky.  Intransitivity of preferences. , 1969 .

[19]  Ulrich Hoffrage,et al.  Quick estimation : Letting the environment do the work , 1999 .

[20]  Seth Bullock,et al.  Demons versus heuristics in artificial intelligence, behavioral ecology, and economics , 1999 .

[21]  A. Grafen.  Biological signals as handicaps. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.

[22]  Juan D Delius,et al.  Transitive responding in animals and humans: Exaptation rather than adaptation? , 1998, Behavioural Processes.

[23]  V. Braitenberg.  Vehicles, Experiments in Synthetic Psychology , 1984 .

[24]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Fast and frugal heuristics: The adaptive toolbox. , 1999 .

[25]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  The recognition heuristic: How ignorance makes us smart , 1999 .

[26]  Terry Connolly,et al.  Action as a Fast and Frugal Heuristic , 1999, Minds and Machines.

[27]  John Tooby,et al.  From evolution to behavior: Evolutionary psychology as the missing link. , 1987 .

[28]  Dorothea Heiss-Czedik,et al.  An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms. , 1997, Artificial Life.

[29]  M. Martin.  White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for Alice , 1995 .

[30]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Rationality in the selection task: Epistemic utility versus uncertainty reduction. , 1996 .

[31]  R. A. Brooks,et al.  Intelligence without Representation , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[32]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  THE ROARING OF RED DEER AND THE EVOLUTION OF HONEST ADVERTISEMENT , 1979 .

[33]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[34]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[35]  N. Chater,et al.  RATIONAL EXPLANATION OF THE SELECTION TASK , 1996 .

[36]  A. Tversky,et al.  Information versus reward in binary choices. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[37]  M. Davison,et al.  The matching law: A research review. , 1988 .

[38]  Nick Chater,et al.  A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. , 1994 .

[39]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[40]  Christopher J. Merz,et al.  UCI Repository of Machine Learning Databases , 1996 .

[41]  G Gigerenzer,et al.  Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. , 1996, Psychological review.

[42]  R A Brooks,et al.  New Approaches to Robotics , 1991, Science.

[43]  J. C. Schlimmer,et al.  Concept acquisition through representational adjustment , 1987 .

[44]  Michael Schmitt,et al.  Simplicity and Robustness of Fast and Frugal Heuristics , 1999, Minds and Machines.

[45]  P. Kop.  Reinforcement, choice and response strength , 1990 .

[46]  G. Gigerenzer,et al.  Probabilistic mental models: a Brunswikian theory of confidence. , 1991, Psychological review.

[47]  Karl Christoph Klauer,et al.  On the Normative Justification for Information Gain in Wason's Selection Task. , 1999 .

[48]  Refractor.  Vision , 2000, The Lancet.

[49]  S. Shafir.  Intransitivity of preferences in honey bees: support for 'comparative' evaluation of foraging options , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[50]  John R. Anderson.  The Adaptive Character of Thought , 1990 .

[52]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[53]  Ruth Garrett Millikan,et al.  White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for Alice. , 1984 .