Why Negotiators Should Reveal Their Deadlines: Disclosing Weaknesses Can Make You Stronger

Conventional wisdom holds that negotiators who are under time pressure should avoid revealing their final deadlines to the other side, especially if they are in a weak position. The present study questions this conventional wisdom. The experiment manipulates time pressure on the negotiators, knowledge of that time pressure, and each side’s power at the bargaining table. Power is manipulated by varying the quality of each side’s alternatives to negotiated agreement (BATNAs). Results show that negotiators benefited from revealing their final deadlines, regardless of the strength of their BATNAs. The discussion explores why this simple lesson is counterintuitive and why negotiators mistakenly believe they ought to keep their deadlines secret.

[1]  Peter J. Carnevale,et al.  Time Pressure in Negotiation and Mediation , 1993 .

[2]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Behavior as seen by the actor and as seen by the observer , 1973 .

[3]  Herb Cohen,et al.  You Can Negotiate Anything , 1982 .

[4]  Joe C Magee,et al.  From power to action. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  L. Thompson The influence of experience on negotiation performance , 1990 .

[6]  Rebecca J. Bennett,et al.  The Impact of Alternatives to Settlement in Dyadic Negotiation , 1994 .

[7]  A. Rubinstein Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model , 1982 .

[8]  Jacques L. Koko,et al.  The Art and Science of Negotiation , 2009 .

[9]  M. Bazerman,et al.  Cognition and Rationality in Negotiation , 1991 .

[10]  K. Fiedler,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2002 .

[11]  B. Englis,et al.  Expectations of Cooperation and Competition and Their Effects on Observers' Vicarious Emotional Responses , 1989 .

[12]  Margaret A. Neale,et al.  Power imbalance and the pattern of exchange in dyadic negotiation , 1993 .

[13]  P Dawson Secrets of power negotiating. , 1997, MLO: medical laboratory observer.

[14]  G. Yukl EFFECTS OF THE OPPONENT'S INITIAL OFFER, CONCESSION MAGNITUDE, AND CONCESSION FREQUENCY ON BARGAINING BEHAVIOR , 1974 .

[15]  William H. Ross,et al.  Effects of interpersonal trust and time pressure on managerial mediation strategy in a simulated organizational dispute. , 1996 .

[16]  Peter S. Fader,et al.  Power and Goal Setting in Channel Negotiations , 1986 .

[17]  Michael P. Malone,et al.  The effects of time pressure and issue settlement order on integrative bargaining. , 1976 .

[18]  Jeff M. Bickerton,et al.  Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving in , 2002 .

[19]  Don A. Moore,et al.  Overconfidence and Underconfidence: When and Why People Underestimate (and Overestimate) the Competition , 2007 .

[20]  Tai Gyu Kim,et al.  Myopic social prediction and the solo comparison effect. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  A. Roth,et al.  The Deadline Effect in Bargaining: Some Experimental Evidence , 1988 .

[22]  D. Moore Myopic prediction, self-destructive secrecy, and the unexpected benefits of revealing final deadlines in negotiation , 2004 .

[23]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  Power, Propensity to Negotiate, and Moving First in Competitive Interactions , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[24]  P. Carnevale,et al.  Time Pressure and the Development of Integrative Agreements in Bilateral Negotiations , 1986 .

[25]  Don A. Moore,et al.  The unexpected benefits of final deadlines in negotiation , 2004 .

[26]  Richard E. Wilson,et al.  STARTEGIC BARGAINING MODELS AND INTERPRETATION ON STRIKE DATA. , 1989 .

[27]  J. Kennan,et al.  Theories of Bargaining Delays , 1990, Science.

[28]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  Power balance and the rationality of outcomes in matching markets. , 1991 .

[29]  Sander L. Koole,et al.  On the Seizing and Freezing of Negotiator Inferences: Need for Cognitive Closure Moderates the Use of Heuristics in Negotiation , 1999 .

[30]  Kathleen L. McGinn,et al.  Perceived Relative Power and its Influence on Negotiations , 2005 .

[31]  Ola Svenson,et al.  Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making , 1993 .

[32]  D. Moore,et al.  Myopic Biases in Strategic Social Prediction: Why Deadlines Put Everyone Under More Pressure Than Everyone Else , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[33]  Ellen Giebels,et al.  Interdependence in negotiation: effects of exit options and social motive on distributive and integrative negotiation , 2000 .

[34]  W. McCarthy,et al.  The role of power and principle inGetting to YES , 1985 .