A psychophysical evaluation of haptic controllers: viscosity perception of soft environments

In this paper, human viscosity perception in haptic teleoperation systems is thoroughly analyzed. An accurate perception of viscoelastic environmental properties such as viscosity is a critical ability in several contexts, such as telesurgery, telerehabilitation, telemedicine, and soft-tissue interaction. We study and compare the ability to perceive viscosity from the standpoint of detection and discrimination using several relevant control methods for the teleoperator. The perception-based method, which was proposed by the authors to enhance the operator's kinesthetic perception, is compared with the conventional transparency-based control method for the teleoperation system. The fidelity-based method, which is a primary method among perception-centered control schemes in teleoperation, is also studied. We also examine the necessity and impact of the remote-site force information for each of the methods. The comparison is based on a series of psychophysical experiments measuring absolute threshold and just noticeable difference for all conditions. The results clearly show that the perception-based method enhances both detection and discrimination abilities compare with other control methods. The results further show that the fidelity-based method confers a better discrimination ability than the transparency-based method, although this is not true with respect to detection ability. In addition, we show that force information improves viscosity detection for all control methods, as predicted from previous theoretical analysis, but improves the discrimination threshold only for the perception-based method.

[1]  J W Hill,et al.  Telepresence interface with applications to microsurgery and surgical simulation. , 1998, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[2]  Susan J. Lederman,et al.  The perceived roughness of resistive virtual textures: II. effects of varying viscosity with a force-feedback device , 2006, TAP.

[3]  Jan Peirs,et al.  A micro optical force sensor for force feedback during minimally invasive robotic surgery , 2003 .

[4]  Bradley J. Nelson,et al.  Biological Cell Injection Using an Autonomous MicroRobotic System , 2002, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[5]  Mandayam A. Srinivasan,et al.  Manual resolution of viscosity and mass , 1995 .

[6]  L. Jones Kinesthetic Sensing , 2000 .

[7]  Antonio Franchi,et al.  Human-Centered Design and Evaluation of Haptic Cueing for Teleoperation of Multiple Mobile Robots , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[8]  Doo Yong Lee,et al.  Estimation of environmental force for the haptic interface of robotic surgery , 2010, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[9]  Control Division,et al.  Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division , 1996 .

[10]  J. Dankelman,et al.  The influence of force feedback and visual feedback in grasping tissue laparoscopicaUy , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy.

[11]  Septimiu E. Salcudean,et al.  Analysis of Control Architectures for Teleoperation Systems with Impedance/Admittance Master and Slave Manipulators , 2001, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[12]  Bernhard Kübler,et al.  Endoscopic 3 DoF-Instrument with 7 DoF Force/Torque Feedback , 2009 .

[13]  B. Leupen,et al.  Design and analysis , 1997 .

[14]  Bernhard Kübler,et al.  Prototype of Instrument for Minimally Invasive Surgery with 6-Axis Force Sensing Capability , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  Mark W. Spong,et al.  Bilateral teleoperation: An historical survey , 2006, Autom..

[16]  Dale A. Lawrence Stability and transparency in bilateral teleoperation , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[17]  I. Hunter,et al.  A perceptual analysis of viscosity , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Doo Yong Lee,et al.  Psychophysical evaluation of control scheme designed for optimal kinesthetic perception in scaled teleoperation , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[19]  B. Hannaford,et al.  Force-feedback grasper helps restore sense of touch in minimally invasive surgery , 1999, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[20]  Felix C Huang,et al.  Manual skill generalization enhanced by negative viscosity. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Hideki Hashimoto,et al.  Effect of Impedance-Shaping on Perception of Soft Tissues in Macro-Micro Teleoperation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[22]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Telerobotics , 1989, Autom..

[23]  Simon S. Haykin,et al.  Active Network Theory. , 1970 .

[24]  Shahin Sirouspour,et al.  Nonlinear and Filtered Force/Position Mappings in Bilateral Teleoperation With Application to Enhanced Stiffness Discrimination , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[25]  C. Steele,et al.  The Rheology of Liquids: A Comparison of Clinicians’ Subjective Impressions and Objective Measurement , 2003, Dysphagia.

[26]  M. Moallem,et al.  Methods and mechanisms for contact feedback in a robot-assisted minimally invasive environment , 2006, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[27]  Alana Sherman,et al.  Design of bilateral teleoperation controllers for haptic exploration and telemanipulation of soft environments , 2002, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[28]  S. Shankar Sastry,et al.  Applications of micromechatronics in minimally invasive surgery , 1998 .

[29]  Woojin Ahn,et al.  Haptic Interface of the KAIST-Ewha Colonoscopy Simulator II , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[30]  Marco Vicentini,et al.  Perception-centric Force Scaling in Bilateral Teleoperation , 2010 .

[31]  George A. Gescheider,et al.  Psychophysics: The Fundamentals , 1997 .

[32]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  Stability of Haptic Rendering: Discretization, Quantization, Time Delay, and Coulomb Effects , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[33]  Hendrik Van Brussel,et al.  Reliable and Enhanced Stiffness Perception in Soft-tissue Telemanipulation , 2005, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[34]  Alana Sherman,et al.  COMPARISON OF TELEOPERATOR CONTROL ARCHITECTURES FOR PALPATION TASK , 2000 .

[35]  Frank Tendick,et al.  Frequency Dependence of Compliance Contrast Detection , 2000, Dynamic Systems and Control: Volume 2.

[36]  H. Hashimoto,et al.  Enhancement in Operator's Perception of Soft Tissues and Its Experimental Validation for Scaled Teleoperation Systems , 2011, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[37]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  DLR MiroSurge: a versatile system for research in endoscopic telesurgery , 2010, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[38]  A. Belegundu,et al.  Optimization Concepts and Applications in Engineering , 2011 .

[39]  G. Gescheider Psychophysics: The Fundamentals , 1997 .

[40]  M. Schijven,et al.  The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.