Supporting Interoperability and Context-Awareness in E-Learning through Situation-Driven Learning Processes

Current E-Learning technologies primarily follow a data and metadata-centric paradigm by providing the learner with composite content containing the learning resources and the learning process description, usually based on specific metadata standards such as ADL SCORM or IMS Learning Design. Due to the design-time binding of learning resources, the actual learning context cannot be considered appropriately at runtime, what limits the reusability and interoperability of learning resources. This paper proposes Situation-driven Learning Processes (SDLP) which describe learning processes semantically from two perspectives: the user perspective considers a learning process as a course of learning goals which lead from an initial situation to a desired situation, whereas the system perspective utilizes Semantic Web Services (SWS) technology to semantically describe necessary resources for each learning goal within a specific learning situation. Consequently, a learning process is composed dynamically and accomplished in terms of SWS goal achievements by automatically allocating learning resources at runtime. Moreover, metadata standard independent SDLP are mapped to established standards such as ADL SCORM and IMS LD. As a result, dynamic adaptation to specific learning contexts as well as interoperability across different metadata standards and application environments is achieved. To prove the feasibility, a prototypical application is described finally.

[1]  Nicola Henze Personalized E-Learning in the Semantic Web , 2006, iJET.

[2]  Manuel Lama,et al.  A Learning Design Ontology based on the IMS Specification , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[3]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[4]  Cristina Baroglio,et al.  Using a rational agent in an adaptive web-based tutoring system , 2002 .

[5]  Gaetano Cuozzo,et al.  The Liguria regional management and technological innovation , 2001 .

[6]  Paul Kawachi,et al.  Ethics in Interactions in Distance Education , 2009 .

[7]  John Domingue,et al.  Context-aware Process Support through Automatic Selection and Invocation of Semantic Web Services , 2007, IEEE International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing and Applications (SOCA '07).

[8]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  Foundations for service ontologies: aligning OWL-S to dolce , 2004, WWW '04.

[9]  Nikos Karacapilidis,et al.  Dynamic Advancements in Teaching and Learning Based Technologies: New Concepts , 2010 .

[10]  Nicola Henze,et al.  A Personalization Service for Curriculum Planning , 2006, LWA.

[11]  Rachael Knight,et al.  Encyclopedia of Distance Learning , 2005 .

[12]  John Domingue,et al.  Choreography in IRS-III - Coping with Heterogeneous Interaction Patterns in Web Services , 2005, SEMWEB.

[13]  John Domingue,et al.  Context-aware Process Support through automatic Discovery and Invocation of Semantic Web Services , 2007 .

[14]  John Domingue,et al.  Mediation of semantic web services in IRS-III , 2005 .

[15]  Holger Lausen,et al.  D2v02. Web Service Modeling Ontology - Standard (WSMO - Standard) , 2004 .

[16]  Angelo Panar Advanced Distributed Learning (ADL) , 2009 .

[17]  Peter Dolog,et al.  Conceptualising Smart Spaces for Learning , 2004 .

[18]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Sweetening Ontologies with DOLCE , 2002, EKAW.

[19]  Li Yang,et al.  Web-Based Interactive 3D Visualization for Computer Graphics Education , 2003, Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol..

[20]  Glenn Lowry,et al.  Information Systems Education for the 21st Century: Aligning Curriculum Content and Delivery with the Professional Workplace. , 2005 .

[21]  T. C. Edwin Cheng,et al.  Conceptual Framework and Architecture for Agent-Oriented Knowledge Management Supported E-Learning Systems , 2005, Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol..

[22]  Enrico Motta,et al.  An Overview of the OCML Modelling Language , 1998 .

[23]  Robert Richards,et al.  Universal Description, Discovery, and Integration (UDDI) , 2006 .

[24]  Peter Dolog,et al.  Reasoning and Ontologies for Personalized E-Learning in the Semantic Web , 2004, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[25]  Ugur Demiray,et al.  Ethical Practices and Implications in Distance Learning , 2008 .

[26]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  Understanding the Semantic Web through Descriptions and Situations , 2003, OTM.

[27]  Betty Collis,et al.  Technology and human issues in reusing learning objects , 2004 .

[28]  Dragan Gasevic,et al.  An Ontology-Based Framework for Bridging Learning Design and Learning Content , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[29]  Carla Limongelli,et al.  Student and Teacher Perspectives Testing a System for Adaptive e-Learning , 2011 .

[30]  John Domingue,et al.  IRS-III: A Broker for Semantic Web Services Based Applications , 2006, International Semantic Web Conference.

[31]  Jos de Bruijn,et al.  Enabling Semantic Web Services: The Web Service Modeling Ontology , 2006 .

[32]  Andreas Schmidt,et al.  User Context Aware Delivery of E-Learning Material: Approach and Architecture , 2004, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..