PDE-constrained Models with Neural Network Terms: Optimization and Global Convergence

Recent research has used deep learning to develop partial differential equation (PDE) models in science and engineering. The functional form of the PDE is determined by a neural network, and the neural network parameters are calibrated to available data. Calibration of the embedded neural network can be performed by optimizing over the PDE. Motivated by these applications, we rigorously study the optimization of a class of linear elliptic PDEs with neural network terms. The neural network parameters in the PDE are optimized using gradient descent, where the gradient is evaluated using an adjoint PDE. As the number of parameters become large, the PDE and adjoint PDE converge to a non-local PDE system. Using this limit PDE system, we are able to prove convergence of the neural network-PDE to a global minimum during the optimization. Finally, we use this adjoint method to train a neural network model for an application in fluid mechanics, in which the neural network functions as a closure model for the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations. The RANS neural network model is trained on several datasets for turbulent channel flow and is evaluated out-of-sample at different Reynolds numbers.

[1]  G. Karniadakis,et al.  Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Heat Transfer Problems , 2021, Journal of Heat Transfer.

[2]  Embedded training of neural-network sub-grid-scale turbulence models , 2021, Physical Review Fluids.

[3]  K. Duraisamy,et al.  Generalizable physics-constrained modeling using learning and inference assisted by feature-space engineering , 2021, Physical Review Fluids.

[4]  G. Karniadakis,et al.  Flow over an espresso cup: inferring 3-D velocity and pressure fields from tomographic background oriented Schlieren via physics-informed neural networks , 2021, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  Stephan Hoyer,et al.  Machine learning–accelerated computational fluid dynamics , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  George Em Karniadakis,et al.  NSFnets (Navier-Stokes flow nets): Physics-informed neural networks for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations , 2020, J. Comput. Phys..

[7]  Liu Yang,et al.  B-PINNs: Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems with Noisy Data , 2020, J. Comput. Phys..

[8]  Karthik Duraisamy,et al.  Perspectives on machine learning-augmented Reynolds-averaged and large eddy simulation models of turbulence , 2020, Physical Review Fluids.

[9]  George Em Karniadakis,et al.  hp-VPINNs: Variational Physics-Informed Neural Networks With Domain Decomposition , 2020, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[10]  Justin Sirignano,et al.  DPM: A deep learning PDE augmentation method (with application to large-eddy simulation) , 2019, J. Comput. Phys..

[11]  Tau Shean Lim,et al.  Quantitative Propagation of Chaos in a Bimolecular Chemical Reaction-Diffusion Model , 2019, SIAM J. Math. Anal..

[12]  Petros Koumoutsakos,et al.  Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanics , 2019, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  Natalia Gimelshein,et al.  PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library , 2019, NeurIPS.

[14]  M. P. Brenner,et al.  Perspective on machine learning for advancing fluid mechanics , 2019, Physical Review Fluids.

[15]  Luca Massa,et al.  Machine learning-assisted early ignition prediction in a complex flow , 2019, Combustion and Flame.

[16]  Paris Perdikaris,et al.  Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations , 2019, J. Comput. Phys..

[17]  Karthik Duraisamy,et al.  Towards Integrated Field Inversion and Machine Learning With Embedded Neural Networks for RANS Modeling , 2019, AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum.

[18]  Jianren Fan,et al.  Investigations of data-driven closure for subgrid-scale stress in large-eddy simulation , 2018, Physics of Fluids.

[19]  M. Raissi,et al.  Deep Learning of PDF Turbulence Closure , 2018 .

[20]  Michael S. Triantafyllou,et al.  Deep learning of vortex-induced vibrations , 2018, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[21]  Jens Berg,et al.  Neural network augmented inverse problems for PDEs , 2017, 1712.09685.

[22]  A. Lipatnikov,et al.  Recent Advances in Understanding of Thermal Expansion Effects in Premixed Turbulent Flames , 2017 .

[23]  J. Templeton,et al.  Reynolds averaged turbulence modelling using deep neural networks with embedded invariance , 2016, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[24]  Julia Ling,et al.  Machine learning strategies for systems with invariance properties , 2016, J. Comput. Phys..

[25]  Qiqi Wang,et al.  Simultaneous single-step one-shot optimization with unsteady PDEs , 2015, J. Comput. Appl. Math..

[26]  Y. Ju,et al.  Plasma assisted combustion: Dynamics and chemistry , 2015 .

[27]  Nicolas R. Gauger,et al.  One-shot methods in function space for PDE-constrained optimal control problems , 2014, Optim. Methods Softw..

[28]  Andreas Griewank,et al.  One-Shot Approaches to Design Optimzation , 2014 .

[29]  Damián R. Fernández,et al.  Adjoint method for a tumor growth PDE-constrained optimization problem , 2012, Comput. Math. Appl..

[30]  Enrique Zuazua,et al.  Continuous adjoint approach for the Spalart−Allmaras model in aerodynamic optimization , 2012 .

[31]  S. Gordeyev,et al.  Physics and Computation of Aero-Optics , 2012 .

[32]  Andreas Griewank,et al.  Automated Extension of Fixed Point PDE Solvers for Optimal Design with Bounded Retardation , 2012, Constrained Optimization and Optimal Control for Partial Differential Equations.

[33]  Hung Tran,et al.  ADJOINT METHODS FOR OBSTACLE PROBLEMS AND WEAKLY COUPLED SYSTEMS OF PDE , 2011, 1103.3226.

[34]  Stefan Ulbrich,et al.  Convergence of Linearized and Adjoint Approximations for Discontinuous Solutions of Conservation Laws. Part 1: Linearized Approximations and Linearized Output Functionals , 2010, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[35]  Stefan Ulbrich,et al.  Convergence of Linearized and Adjoint Approximations for Discontinuous Solutions of Conservation Laws. Part 2: Adjoint Approximations and Extensions , 2010, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[36]  Baris A. Sen,et al.  Large eddy simulation of extinction and reignition with artificial neural networks based chemical kinetics , 2010 .

[37]  Baris A. Sen,et al.  Linear eddy mixing based tabulation and artificial neural networks for large eddy simulations of turbulent flames , 2010 .

[38]  Stefan Ulbrich,et al.  Optimization with PDE Constraints , 2008, Mathematical modelling.

[39]  Stefan Ulbrich,et al.  A Continuous Adjoint Approach to Shape Optimization for Navier Stokes Flow , 2009 .

[40]  Bartosz Protas,et al.  Adjoint-based optimization of PDE systems with alternative gradients , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[41]  Heinz Pitsch,et al.  High order conservative finite difference scheme for variable density low Mach number turbulent flows , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[42]  Subhendu Bikash Hazra,et al.  Direct Treatment of State Constraints in Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using Simultaneous Pseudo-Time-Stepping , 2007 .

[43]  A. Jameson,et al.  Reduction of the Adjoint Gradient Formula in the Continuous Limit , 2003 .

[44]  H. Kushner,et al.  Stochastic Approximation and Recursive Algorithms and Applications , 2003 .

[45]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using the Adjoint Method , 2003 .

[46]  Volker Schulz,et al.  Simultaneous Pseudo-Timestepping for PDE-Model Based Optimization Problems , 2004, Universität Trier, Mathematik/Informatik, Forschungsbericht.

[47]  Michael B. Giles,et al.  The harmonic adjoint approach to unsteady turbomachinery design , 2002 .

[48]  A. Jameson,et al.  STUDIES OF THE CONTINUOUS AND DISCRETE ADJOINT APPROACHES TO VISCOUS AUTOMATIC AERODYNAMIC SHAPE OPTIMIZATION , 2001 .

[49]  Niles A. Pierce,et al.  An Introduction to the Adjoint Approach to Design , 2000 .

[50]  Michael B. Giles,et al.  Adjoint Recovery of Superconvergent Functionals from PDE Approximations , 2000, SIAM Rev..

[51]  A. Jameson,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THE CONTINUOUS AND DISCRETE ADJOINT APPROACH TO AUTOMATIC AERODYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION , 2000 .

[52]  A. Jameson,et al.  Optimum Aerodynamic Design Using the Navier–Stokes Equations , 1997 .

[53]  P. Bassanini,et al.  Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order , 1997 .

[54]  E. T. Curran,et al.  Fluid Phenomena in Scramjet Combustion Systems , 1996 .

[55]  A. Jameson,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Complex Aircraft Configurations via an Adjoint Formulation , 1996 .

[56]  S. Ta'asan PSEUDO-TIME METHODS FOR CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS GOVERNED BY PDE , 1995 .

[57]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks , 1991, Neural Networks.

[58]  S. Taasan One shot methods for optimal control of distributed parameter systems 1: Finite dimensional control , 1991 .

[59]  B. Launder,et al.  The numerical computation of turbulent flows , 1990 .

[60]  P. Moin,et al.  Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[61]  P. Moin,et al.  Application of a Fractional-Step Method to Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations , 1984 .

[62]  W. Jones,et al.  The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence , 1972 .

[63]  A. Chorin Numerical solution of the Navier-Stokes equations , 1968 .

[64]  F. Harlow,et al.  Numerical Calculation of Time‐Dependent Viscous Incompressible Flow of Fluid with Free Surface , 1965 .

[65]  G. M.,et al.  Partial Differential Equations I , 2023, Applied Mathematical Sciences.