Adaptive Radiation from Resource Competition in Digital Organisms

Species richness often peaks at intermediate productivity and decreases as resources become more or less abundant. The mechanisms that produce this pattern are not completely known, but several previous studies have suggested environmental heterogeneity as a cause. In experiments with evolving digital organisms and populations of fixed size, maximum species richness emerges at intermediate productivity, even in a spatially homogeneous environment, owing to frequency-dependent selection to exploit an influx of mixed resources. A diverse pool of limiting resources is sufficient to cause adaptive radiation, which is manifest by the origin and maintenance of phenotypically and phylogenetically distinct groups of organisms.

[1]  S. Goldhor.  Ecology , 1964, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[2]  B. Bainbridge,et al.  Genetics , 1981, Experientia.

[3]  D. Tilman.  Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[4]  J. Adams,et al.  Evolution of Escherichia coli during growth in a constant environment. , 1987, Genetics.

[5]  R. Rosenzweig,et al.  Microbial evolution in a simple unstructured environment: genetic differentiation in Escherichia coli. , 1994, Genetics.

[6]  James P. Grover,et al.  Simple Rules for Interspecific Dominance in Systems with Exploitative and Apparent Competition , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[7]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Species Diversity in Space and Time , 1995 .

[8]  P. Abrams.  Monotonic or unimodal diversity-productivity gradients : what does competition theory predict? , 1995 .

[9]  F. Maytag.  Evolution , 1996, Arch. Mus. Informatics.

[10]  R. Lenski,et al.  Tests of Ecological Mechanisms Promoting the Stable Coexistence of Two Bacterial Genotypes , 1996 .

[11]  Mathew A. Leibold,et al.  A Graphical Model of Keystone Predators in Food Webs: Trophic Regulation of Abundance, Incidence, and Diversity Patterns in Communities , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[12]  Michael Travisano,et al.  Adaptive radiation in a heterogeneous environment , 1998, Nature.

[13]  J. Adams,et al.  Repeated evolution of an acetate-crossfeeding polymorphism in long-term populations of Escherichia coli. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.

[14]  M. Willig,et al.  The Relationship Between Productivity and Species Richness , 1999 .

[15]  G. Bell,et al.  Diversity peaks at intermediate productivity in a laboratory microcosm , 2000, Nature.

[16]  Daniel E Rozen,et al.  Long‐Term Experimental Evolution in Escherichia coli. VIII. Dynamics of a Balanced Polymorphism , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[17]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  Evolutionary Branching and Sympatric Speciation Caused by Different Types of Ecological Interactions , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[18]  T. Jukes,et al.  The neutral theory of molecular evolution. , 2000, Genetics.

[19]  Peter J. Morin,et al.  Biodiversity's ups and downs , 2000, Nature.

[20]  Katherine L. Gross,et al.  WHAT IS THE OBSERVED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPECIES RICHNESS AND PRODUCTIVITY , 2001 .

[21]  F. Cohan.  Bacterial species and speciation. , 2001, Systematic biology.

[22]  C. Wilke,et al.  The biology of digital organisms , 2002 .

[23]  Robert T. Pennock,et al.  The evolutionary origin of complex features , 2003, Nature.

[24]  B. Bohannan,et al.  Bacterial diversity patterns along a gradient of primary productivity , 2003 .

[25]  T. Fukami,et al.  Productivity–biodiversity relationships depend on the history of community assembly , 2003, Nature.

[26]  Charles Ofria,et al.  Avida , 2004, Artificial Life.

[27]  Michael Doebeli,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FOR SYMPATRIC ECOLOGICAL DIVERSIFICATION DUE TO FREQUENCY‐DEPENDENT COMPETITION IN ESCHERICHIA COLI , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.