The Role of the Left Head of Caudate in Suppressing Irrelevant Words

Suppressing irrelevant words is essential to successful speech production and is expected to involve general control mechanisms that reduce interference from task-unrelated processing. To investigate the neural mechanisms that suppress visual word interference, we used fMRI and a Stroop task, using a block design with an event-related analysis. Participants indicated with a finger press whether a visual stimulus was colored pink or blue. The stimulus was either the written word “BLUE,” the written word “PINK,” or a string of four Xs, with word interference introduced when the meaning of the word and its color were “incongruent” (e.g., BLUE in pink hue) relative to congruent (e.g., BLUE in blue) or neutral (e.g., XXXX in pink). The participants also made color decisions in the presence of spatial interference rather than word interference (i.e., the Simon task). By blocking incongruent, congruent, and neutral trials, we identified activation related to the mechanisms that suppress interference as that which was greater at the end relative to the start of incongruency. This highlighted the role of the left head of caudate in the control of word interference but not spatial interference. The response in the left head of caudate contrasted to bilateral inferior frontal activation that was greater at the start than at the end of incongruency, and to the dorsal anterior cingulate gyrus which responded to a change in the motor response. Our study therefore provides novel insights into the role of the left head of caudate in the mechanisms that suppress word interference.

[1]  Lukas Scheef,et al.  Neural correlates of semantic ambiguity processing during context verification , 2009, NeuroImage.

[2]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  The neural mechanisms of speech comprehension: fMRI studies of semantic ambiguity. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  Penny A. MacDonald,et al.  Differential Effects of Dopaminergic Therapies on Dorsal and Ventral Striatum in Parkinson's Disease: Implications for Cognitive Function , 2011, Parkinson's Disease.

[4]  Tobias Egner,et al.  The neural correlates and functional integration of cognitive control in a Stroop task , 2005, NeuroImage.

[5]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[6]  M. Seghier,et al.  Language control and lexical competition in bilinguals: an event-related FMRI study. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. , 1990, Psychological review.

[8]  E. Crone,et al.  Sequential effects on speeded information processing: a developmental study. , 2005, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[9]  Cornelius Weiller,et al.  The separation of processing stages in a lexical interference fMRI-paradigm , 2009, NeuroImage.

[10]  Scott A Langenecker,et al.  fMRI of healthy older adults during Stroop interference , 2004, NeuroImage.

[11]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[12]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  Distinct neural systems underlie learning visuomotor and spatial representations of motor skills , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[13]  E. Delosh,et al.  Age Differences in Stroop Interference: Contributions of General Slowing and Task-Specific Deficits , 2007, Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition.

[14]  Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  Second Language Interferes with Word Production in Fluent Bilinguals: Brain Potential and Functional Imaging Evidence , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  S. Inati,et al.  An fMRI study of reward-related probability learning , 2005, NeuroImage.

[16]  C. Kennard,et al.  Human Medial Frontal Cortex Mediates Unconscious Inhibition of Voluntary Action , 2007, Neuron.

[17]  John G. Kerns,et al.  Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex activity in an FMRI study of trial-to-trial adjustments on the Simon task , 2006, NeuroImage.

[18]  Angela D Friederici,et al.  What's in control of language? , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  Remco J. Renken,et al.  Semantic ambiguity processing in sentence context: Evidence from event-related fMRI , 2007, NeuroImage.

[20]  O. Gruber,et al.  Oddball and incongruity effects during Stroop task performance: A comparative fMRI study on selective attention , 2006, Brain Research.

[21]  R. Turner,et al.  Language Control in the Bilingual Brain , 2006, Science.

[22]  M. Petrides,et al.  Functional role of the basal ganglia in the planning and execution of actions , 2006, Annals of neurology.

[23]  Jin Fan,et al.  Cognitive and Brain Consequences of Conflict , 2003, NeuroImage.

[24]  Aziz M. Ulug,et al.  Parametric manipulation of conflict and response competition using rapid mixed-trial event-related fMRI , 2003, NeuroImage.

[25]  S. Nieuwenhuis,et al.  Neural mechanisms of attention and control: losing our inhibitions? , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Reactions toward the source of stimulation. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  Katie L. McMahon,et al.  Semantic Context and Visual Feature Effects in Object Naming: An fMRI Study using Arterial Spin Labeling , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Comparing event-related and epoch analysis in blocked design fMRI , 2003, NeuroImage.

[29]  Lori J. P. Altmann,et al.  High-Level Language Production in Parkinson's Disease: A Review , 2011, Parkinson's disease.

[30]  Katie McMahon,et al.  Top‐down influences on lexical selection during spoken word production: A 4T fMRI investigation of refractory effects in picture naming , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[31]  Ton Dijkstra,et al.  Language Conflict in the Bilingual Brain , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  John C Gore,et al.  An event-related functional MRI study comparing interference effects in the Simon and Stroop tasks. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[33]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Stochastic Designs in Event-Related fMRI , 1999, NeuroImage.

[34]  Rajita Sinha,et al.  Subcortical processes of motor response inhibition during a stop signal task , 2008, NeuroImage.

[35]  Elizabeth Tricomi,et al.  Feedback signals in the caudate reflect goal achievement on a declarative memory task , 2008, NeuroImage.

[36]  S. Thompson-Schill,et al.  Task-dependent semantic interference in language production: An fMRI study , 2008, Brain and Language.

[37]  Katya Rubia,et al.  Familial and disease specific abnormalities in the neural correlates of the Stroop Task in Bipolar Disorder , 2011, NeuroImage.

[38]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The Importance of Distributed Sampling in Blocked Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Designs , 2002, NeuroImage.

[39]  Benedetto De Martino,et al.  How Choice Reveals and Shapes Expected Hedonic Outcome , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  Jubin Abutalebi,et al.  Bilingual language production: The neurocognition of language representation and control , 2007, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[41]  Xun Liu,et al.  Common and distinct neural substrates of attentional control in an integrated Simon and spatial Stroop task as assessed by event-related fMRI , 2004, NeuroImage.

[42]  H. Duffau,et al.  The role of dominant striatum in language: a study using intraoperative electrical stimulations , 2005, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[43]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[44]  Nikolai Axmacher,et al.  Activation of the caudal anterior cingulate cortex due to task‐related interference in an auditory Stroop paradigm , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[45]  Tobias Egner,et al.  Separate conflict-specific cognitive control mechanisms in the human brain , 2007, NeuroImage.

[46]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Performance Feedback Drives Caudate Activation in a Phonological Learning Task , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  D. Green,et al.  Lemma selection without inhibition of languages in bilingual speakers , 1998, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[48]  A. Anderson,et al.  An fMRI study of stroop word-color interference: evidence for cingulate subregions subserving multiple distributed attentional systems , 1999, Biological Psychiatry.

[49]  W. Chase,et al.  Sequential effects in choice reaction time. , 1969 .

[50]  Cameron S. Carter,et al.  Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: A functional MRI study , 2005, NeuroImage.

[51]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Attention Enhances the Neural Processing of Relevant Features and Suppresses the Processing of Irrelevant Features in Humans: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of the Stroop Task , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  Gary F. Egan,et al.  Functional connectivity during Stroop task performance , 2005, NeuroImage.

[53]  Alissa Melinger,et al.  Enhanced phonological facilitation and traces of concurrent word form activation in speech production: An object-naming study with multiple distractors , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[54]  James R. Carey,et al.  Neural changes in control implementation of a continuous task , 2007, Brain and Cognition.

[55]  R. Kahn,et al.  Function of striatum beyond inhibition and execution of motor responses , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[56]  G. V. van Orden A ROWS is a ROSE: spelling, sound, and reading. , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[57]  Michael W. L. Chee,et al.  Dissociating language and word meaning in the bilingual brain , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[58]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Anterior Cingulate Conflict Monitoring and Adjustments in Control , 2004, Science.

[59]  Colin M. Macleod Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[60]  R. Frackowiak,et al.  Demonstrating the implicit processing of visually presented words and pseudowords. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[61]  E. Aarts,et al.  Anticipatory activity in anterior cingulate cortex can be independent of conflict and error likelihood. , 2008, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[62]  Oury Monchi,et al.  Fronto-striatal contribution to lexical set-shifting. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[63]  R. Proctor,et al.  The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[64]  Katherine L. Roberts,et al.  Examining a Supramodal Network for Conflict Processing: A Systematic Review and Novel Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data for Related Visual and Auditory Stroop Tasks , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[65]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 2007 Lexical ambiguity in sentence comprehension , 2016 .

[66]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Inhibitory control of competing motor memories , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[67]  Dexuan Zhang,et al.  Cognitive control explored by linear modelling behaviour and fMRI data during Stroop tasks , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[68]  Joseph M. Orr,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex makes 2 contributions to minimizing distraction. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[69]  C. Carter,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: An update of theory and data , 2007, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[70]  Jean-Marie Annoni,et al.  The Neural Cost of the Auditory Perception of Language Switches: An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study in Bilinguals , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[71]  U. Ansorge,et al.  Exploring trial-by-trial modulations of the Simon effect , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[72]  A. Sanjuán,et al.  Neural bases of language switching in high and early proficient bilinguals , 2011, Brain and Language.

[73]  Allan Reiss,et al.  Striatal volumes in pediatric bipolar patients with and without comorbid ADHD , 2011, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[74]  Thomas A Hammeke,et al.  Neural basis of the Stroop interference task: Response competition or selective attention? , 2002, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[75]  H. Heinze,et al.  Brain potential and functional MRI evidence for how to handle two languages with one brain , 2002, Nature.

[76]  O. Gruber,et al.  Decomposing interference during Stroop performance into different conflict factors: An event-related fMRI study , 2009, Cortex.

[77]  J. Stroop Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[78]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Mechanisms underlying dependencies of performance on stimulus history in a two-alternative forced-choice task , 2002, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[79]  M. Gluck,et al.  Basal ganglia and dopamine contributions to probabilistic category learning , 2008, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[80]  Martin J. McKeown,et al.  Dynamic Bayesian network modeling of fMRI: A comparison of group-analysis methods , 2008, NeuroImage.

[81]  M. Posner,et al.  The functional integration of the anterior cingulate cortex during conflict processing. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[82]  B. Hommel,et al.  A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task , 2004, Psychological research.

[83]  M. Gluck,et al.  Role of the basal ganglia in category learning: how do patients with Parkinson's disease learn? , 2004, Behavioral neuroscience.

[84]  Cathy J. Price,et al.  Functional imaging in the study of recovery patterns in bilingual aphasia , 2001 .

[85]  T. Egner,et al.  Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[86]  C. Price,et al.  A functional imaging study of translation and language switching. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.