Using Design Methods to Improve Design Quality: Verbalizers vs Visualizers

Abstract Although a wide variety of design methods are used, two questions have been little investigated: whether using many methods improves the outcome quality and who benefits more from using them. We conducted a quasi-experiment in a classroom employing a 2 (Design Method: More vs Fewer) x 2 (Style of Processing: Verbalizer vs Visualizer) between-subjects design. We obtained two findings from the data. First, the students using more design methods generated better outcomes than those using fewer design method. Secondly, verbal-oriented students generated better outcomes than visual-oriented students. Our obtained two findings will be discussed in the context of design process.

[1]  Muriel Zimmerman,et al.  Design Research Through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[2]  Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders,et al.  From user-centered to participatory design approaches , 2002 .

[3]  D. F. Marks,et al.  Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. , 1973, British journal of psychology.

[4]  R. Cooper,et al.  New Products: What Separates Winners from Losers? , 1987 .

[5]  Ram Charan,et al.  The Gamechanger: How Every Leader can Drive Everyday Innovation , 2009 .

[6]  Tim Brown,et al.  Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation , 2009 .

[7]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance , 2006 .

[8]  L. Kimbell Rethinking Design Thinking: Part II , 2012 .

[9]  Lucy Kimbell,et al.  Rethinking Design Thinking: Part I , 2011 .

[10]  R. Mayer,et al.  Three Facets of Visual and Verbal Learners: Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Style, and Learning Preference. , 2003 .

[11]  Scott R. Klemmer,et al.  Early and Repeated Exposure to Examples Improves Creative Work , 2012, CogSci.

[12]  Roberto Verganti,et al.  Design Driven Innovation: Changing the Rules of Competition by Radically Innovating What Things Mean , 2009 .

[13]  Alan Richardson,et al.  Verbalizer-visualizer: A cognitive style dimension. , 1977 .

[14]  William K. Darley The moderating influence of style of information processing on media perceptions and information exposure , 1999 .

[15]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution , 2001 .

[16]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Do the Parameters of Choice Models Depend on Differences in Stimulus Presentation: Visual Versus Verbal Presentation? , 1987 .

[17]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas , 2008, TCHI.

[18]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  Measurement of Individual Differences in Visual Versus Verbal Information Processing , 1985 .

[19]  Nigan Bayazit,et al.  Investigating Design: A Review of Forty Years of Design Research , 2004, Design Issues.

[20]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Prototyping dynamics: sharing multiple designs improves exploration, group rapport, and results , 2011, CHI.

[21]  N. Cross Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline Versus Design Science , 2001, Design Issues.

[22]  Paul E. Spector Using self‐report questionnaires in OB research: A comment on the use of a controversial method , 1994 .

[23]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Understanding experience in interactive systems , 2004, DIS '04.

[24]  Cal Swann,et al.  Action Research and the Practice of Design , 2002, Design Issues.

[25]  Roger Martin The Design of Business: Why Design Thinking is the Next Competitive Advantage , 2009 .

[26]  Janetta Mitchell McCoy,et al.  The Potential Role of the Physical Environment in Fostering Creativity , 2002 .

[27]  Amitava Chattopadhyay,et al.  The Use of Visual Mental Imagery in New Product Design , 1999 .

[28]  Sabine Junginger,et al.  Learning to design: giving purpose to heart, hand and mind , 2007 .

[29]  Kevin Clark,et al.  Unleashing the Power of Design Thinking , 2010 .

[30]  G. Button The ethnographic tradition and design , 2000 .

[31]  Charles Hill,et al.  What do Prototypes Prototype , 1997 .

[32]  A A M Wilde,et al.  It's Not What You Think , 2017 .

[33]  David P. Farrington,et al.  SELF-REPORTED DELINQUENCY AND A COMBINED DELINQUENCY SERIOUSNESS SCALE BASED ON BOYS, MOTHERS, AND TEACHERS: CONCURRENT AND PREDICTIVE VALIDITY FOR AFRICAN-AMERICANS AND CAUCASIANS* , 1996 .

[34]  P. Sheehan,et al.  A shortened form of Betts' questionnaire upon mental imagery. , 1967, Journal of clinical psychology.

[35]  Robin Adams,et al.  Being a professional: Three lenses into design thinking, acting, and being , 2011 .

[36]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  101 Design Methods: A Structured Approach for Driving Innovation in Your Organization , 2012 .

[37]  Richard Buchanan,et al.  Design Research and the New Learning , 2001, Design Issues.

[38]  Bella Martin,et al.  Universal Methods of Design: 100 Ways to Research Complex Problems, Develop Innovative Ideas, and Design Effective Solutions , 2012 .

[39]  Lucy Kimbell The service innovation handbook : action-oriented creative thinking toolkit for service organizations : templates, cases, capabilities , 2014 .

[40]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Powers of observation in creative design , 1996 .

[41]  Jeanne Liedtka,et al.  Designing for Growth: A Design Thinking Tool Kit for Managers , 2011 .