Pathways to social evolution: reciprocity, relatedness, and synergy

Many organisms live in populations structured by space and by class, exhibit plastic responses to their social partners, and are subject to nonadditive ecological and fitness effects. Social evolution theory has long recognized that all of these factors can lead to different selection pressures but has only recently attempted to synthesize how these factors interact. Using models for both discrete and continuous phenotypes, we show that analyzing these factors in a consistent framework reveals that they interact with one another in ways previously overlooked. Specifically, behavioral responses (reciprocity), genetic relatedness, and synergy interact in nontrivial ways that cannot be easily captured by simple summary indices of assortment. We demonstrate the importance of these interactions by showing how they have been neglected in previous synthetic models of social behavior both within and between species. These interactions also affect the level of behavioral responses that can evolve in the long run; proximate biological mechanisms are evolutionarily stable when they generate enough responsiveness relative to the level of responsiveness that exactly balances the ecological costs and benefits. Given the richness of social behavior across taxa, these interactions should be a boon for empirical research as they are likely crucial for describing the complex relationship linking ecology, demography, and social behavior.

[1]  S. Wright,et al.  The Relative Importance of Heredity and Environment in Determining the Piebald Pattern of Guinea-Pigs. , 1920, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  R. Punnett,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.

[3]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1931 .

[4]  S. Wright Evolution in mendelian populations , 1931 .

[5]  P. H. Leslie SOME FURTHER NOTES ON THE USE OF MATRICES IN POPULATION MATHEMATICS , 1948 .

[6]  S WRIGHT,et al.  Genetical structure of populations. , 1950, Nature.

[7]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  George R. Price,et al.  Selection and Covariance , 1970, Nature.

[10]  R. Trivers The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[11]  G. Price Fisher's ‘fundamental theorem’ made clear , 1972, Annals of human genetics.

[12]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Altruism and Related Phenomena, Mainly in Social Insects , 1972 .

[13]  G. Price,et al.  Extension of covariance selection mathematics , 1972, Annals of human genetics.

[14]  J. M. Smith,et al.  The Logic of Animal Conflict , 1973, Nature.

[15]  Alan Grafen,et al.  The hawk-dove game played between relatives , 1979, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[17]  U Motro,et al.  Kin selection and strong evolutionary stability of mutual help. , 1981, Theoretical population biology.

[18]  I. Eshel Evolutionary and continuous stability , 1983 .

[19]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON CORRELATED CHARACTERS , 1983, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[20]  D. Queller,et al.  Kin selection and frequency dependence: a game theoretic approach , 1984 .

[21]  G. Wilkinson Reciprocal food sharing in the vampire bat , 1984, Nature.

[22]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[23]  J. Geanakoplos,et al.  Multimarket Oligopoly: Strategic Substitutes and Complements , 1985, Journal of Political Economy.

[24]  D. Queller Kinship, reciprocity and synergism in the evolution of social behaviour , 1985, Nature.

[25]  Drew Fudenberg,et al.  The Folk Theorem in Repeated Games with Discounting or with Incomplete Information , 1986 .

[26]  D. Winkler,et al.  A General Model for Parental Care , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[27]  I. L. Heisler,et al.  A Method for Analyzing Selection in Hierarchically Structured Populations , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[28]  W J Ewens,et al.  An interpretation and proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Natural Selection. , 1989, Theoretical population biology.

[29]  P. Holgate,et al.  Matrix Population Models. , 1990 .

[30]  O. Persson,et al.  A New Avian Mating System: Ambisexual Polygamy in the Penduline Tit Remiz pendulinus , 1989 .

[31]  Peter D. Taylor,et al.  Evolutionary stability in one-parameter models under weak selection , 1989 .

[32]  Peter D. Taylor,et al.  Allele-Frequency Change in a Class-Structured Population , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[33]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  The Evolution of Parental Care , 2019 .

[34]  Charles J. Goodnight,et al.  Contextual Analysis of Models of Group Selection, Soft Selection, Hard Selection, and the Evolution of Altruism , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[35]  D. Queller,et al.  A GENERAL MODEL FOR KIN SELECTION , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[36]  D. Queller,et al.  Quantitative Genetics, Inclusive Fitness, and Group Selection , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[37]  S. Frank Genetics of mutualism: the evolution of altruism between species. , 1994, Journal of theoretical biology.

[38]  T. Wesol̸owski On the Origin of Parental Care and the Early Evolution of Male and Female Parental Roles in Birds , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[39]  Eörs Szathmáry,et al.  The Major Transitions in Evolution , 1997 .

[40]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Evolution in Age-Structured Populations. , 1995 .

[41]  H. Hoi,et al.  Egg burial in penduline tits, Remiz pendulinus: its role in mate desertion and female polyandry , 1997 .

[42]  A. J. Moore,et al.  INTERACTING PHENOTYPES AND THE EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS: I. DIRECT AND INDIRECT GENETIC EFFECTS OF SOCIAL INTERACTIONS , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[43]  S. Frank THE PRICE EQUATION, FISHER'S FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM, KIN SELECTION, AND CAUSAL ANALYSIS , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[44]  M. Taborsky,et al.  Paying to stay or paying to breed? Field evidence for direct benefits of helping behavior in a cooperatively breeding fish , 1998 .

[45]  J. Strassmann,et al.  KIN SELECTION AND SOCIAL INSECTS , 1998 .

[46]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring , 1998, Nature.

[47]  W. Ewens Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits , 1999 .

[48]  Alasdair I Houston,et al.  Incorporating rules for responding into evolutionary games , 1999, Nature.

[49]  A. J. Moore,et al.  Interacting Phenotypes and the Evolutionary Process. II. Selection Resulting from Social Interactions , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[50]  Bill Shipley,et al.  Cause and Correlation in Biology: A User''s Guide to Path Analysis , 2016 .

[51]  J. Pepper,et al.  Relatedness in trait group models of social evolution. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[52]  Rousset,et al.  A theoretical basis for measures of kin selection in subdivided populations: finite populations and localized dispersal , 2000 .

[53]  B. Skyrms The Stag Hunt , 2001 .

[54]  P. J. Moore,et al.  The Evolution of Interacting Phenotypes: Genetics and Evolution of Social Dominance , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[55]  François Rousset,et al.  A minimal derivation of convergence stability measures. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[56]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Single-Gene Greenbeard Effects in the Social Amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , 2003, Science.

[57]  J. Rowe,et al.  Kin selection may inhibit the evolution of reciprocation. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[58]  F. Rousset Genetic Structure and Selection in Subdivided Populations (MPB-40) , 2004 .

[59]  F. Rousset,et al.  Inclusive fitness for traits affecting metapopulation demography. , 2004, Theoretical population biology.

[60]  J. Bull,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 2004, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[61]  AN EXACT FORM OF THE BREEDER'S EQUATION FOR THE EVOLUTION OF A QUANTITATIVE TRAIT UNDER NATURAL SELECTION , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[62]  Richard E. Michod,et al.  On the transfer of fitness from the cell to the multicellular organism , 2006 .

[63]  H. Rundle,et al.  Genetic variance in female condition predicts indirect genetic variance in male sexual display traits , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[64]  D. Queller,et al.  Genetic relatedness in viscous populations , 2005, Evolutionary Ecology.

[65]  K R Foster,et al.  A general model for the evolution of mutualisms , 2006, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[66]  Martin Zwick,et al.  Unifying the Theories of Inclusive Fitness and Reciprocal Altruism , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[67]  Andy Gardner,et al.  The Relation between Multilocus Population Genetics and Social Evolution Theory , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[68]  M. Nowak Five Rules for the Evolution of Cooperation , 2006, Science.

[69]  T. Wenseleers Modelling social evolution: the relative merits and limitations of a Hamilton's rule‐based approach , 2006, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[70]  Laurent Lehmann,et al.  Synergy, partner choice and frequency dependence: their integration into inclusive fitness theory and their interpretation in terms of direct and indirect fitness effects , 2006 .

[71]  C. Hauert,et al.  Synergy and discounting of cooperation in social dilemmas. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[72]  L. Keller,et al.  The evolution of cooperation and altruism – a general framework and a classification of models , 2006, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[73]  J. Wolf,et al.  Indirect genetic effects from ecological interactions in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2007, Molecular ecology.

[74]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  The different limits of weak selection and the evolutionary dynamics of finite populations. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[75]  M. Nowak,et al.  TRANSFORMING THE DILEMMA , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[76]  S. C. Winans,et al.  Cell–cell communication in the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[77]  T. Székely,et al.  Sexual conflict over care: antagonistic effects of clutch desertion on reproductive success of male and female penduline tits , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[78]  A. Griffin,et al.  Evolutionary Explanations for Cooperation , 2007, Current Biology.

[79]  J. André,et al.  Perfect reciprocity is the only evolutionarily stable strategy in the continuous iterated prisoner's dilemma. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[80]  M. Wade,et al.  The joint effects of kin, multilevel selection and indirect genetic effects on response to genetic selection , 2008, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[81]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Indirect genetic effects and the lek paradox: inter-genotypic competition may strengthen genotype × environment interactions and conserve genetic variance , 2008, Genetica.

[82]  J. V. van Arendonk,et al.  Survival of laying hens: genetic parameters for direct and associative effects in three purebred layer lines. , 2008, Poultry science.

[83]  Michael Doebeli,et al.  A simple and general explanation for the evolution of altruism , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[84]  Madeleine Beekman,et al.  Ancestral Monogamy Shows Kin Selection Is Key to the Evolution of Eusociality , 2008, Science.

[85]  A. van Oudenaarden,et al.  Snowdrift game dynamics and facultative cheating in yeast , 2009, Nature.

[86]  E. Visalberghi,et al.  Grooming, rank, and agonistic support in tufted capuchin monkeys , 2009, American journal of primatology.

[87]  E. Brodie,et al.  Indirect Genetic Effects Influence Antipredator Behavior in Guppies: Estimates of the Coefficient of Interaction Psi and the Inheritance of Reciprocity , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[88]  M. Feldman,et al.  A theory for the evolution of other-regard integrating proximate and ultimate perspectives , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[89]  J. A. Marshall The donation game with roles played between relatives. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[90]  H. Ohtsuki,et al.  Strategy selection in structured populations. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[91]  Erol Akçay,et al.  The Perfect Family: Decision Making in Biparental Care , 2009, PloS one.

[92]  A. J. Moore,et al.  INTERACTING PHENOTYPES AND THE EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS. III. SOCIAL EVOLUTION , 2010, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[93]  Erol Akçay,et al.  The evolution of payoff matrices: providing incentives to cooperate , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[94]  D. Portnoy,et al.  A Generalization of Hamilton’s Rule for the Evolution of Microbial Cooperation , 2010, Science.

[95]  Lars Bejder,et al.  Social and genetic interactions drive fitness variation in a free-living dolphin population , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[96]  Rui F. Oliveira,et al.  Hormonal mechanisms of cooperative behaviour , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[97]  J. Merilä,et al.  Indirect genetic effects in a sex‐limited trait: the case of breeding time in red‐billed gulls , 2010, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[98]  Laurent Lehmann,et al.  How life history and demography promote or inhibit the evolution of helping behaviours , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[99]  L. Kruuk,et al.  Indirect genetics effects and evolutionary constraint: an analysis of social dominance in red deer, Cervus elaphus , 2011, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[100]  Erol Akçay,et al.  Negotiation, Sanctions, and Context Dependency in the Legume-Rhizobium Mutualism , 2011, The American Naturalist.

[101]  Jeremy Van Cleve,et al.  Behavioral Responses in Structured Populations Pave the Way to Group Optimality* , 2011, The American Naturalist.

[102]  D. Queller,et al.  Expanded social fitness and Hamilton's rule for kin, kith, and kind , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[103]  H. Ohtsuki Does synergy rescue the evolution of cooperation? An analysis for homogeneous populations with non-overlapping generations. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[104]  L. Lehmann,et al.  Evolutionary and convergence stability for continuous phenotypes in finite populations derived from two-allele models. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[105]  Christopher C. Strelioff,et al.  Society, demography and genetic structure in the spotted hyena , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[106]  Åke Brännström,et al.  Synergy and Group Size in Microbial Cooperation , 2012, The American Naturalist.

[107]  P. Taylor,et al.  An inclusive fitness analysis of synergistic interactions in structured populations , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[108]  N. Christakis,et al.  Social Networks and Cooperation in Hunter-Gatherers , 2011, Nature.

[109]  I. Ligocki,et al.  The extended personality: indirect effects of behavioural syndromes on the behaviour of others in a group-living cichlid , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[110]  Laurent Lehmann,et al.  Stochastic stability and the evolution of coordination in spatially structured populations. , 2013, Theoretical population biology.

[111]  Erol Akçay,et al.  Evolutionary Models of Mutualism , 2015 .

[112]  Kathrin Abendroth,et al.  Evolution In Age Structured Populations , 2016 .