In the existing securities market structure, a securities trade between two parties
requires the involvement of several financial intermediaries ensuring the safety of
the transaction. However, the complexity of today’s market structure in conjunction
with the lack of interoperability between financial data infrastructures and the
disalignment of business practices, are causing costs, risks and friction—resulting
in settlement often taking several days.
Blockchain technology is the innovation powering the cryptocurrency Bitcoin,
which is a network in which digital tokens can be traded peer-to-peer by the
means of cryptography and decentralized consensus. The lack of intermediaries
and short settlement period of cryptocurrencies make blockchain technology an
inspiring database structure for the securities market. In this paper, we examine
the potential of using blockchain technology to create a distributed securities depository.
The decentralized consensus algorithm of blockchain technologies allows
several entities to maintain a shared record of information without having to trust
each other individually, since consensus is formed on a per-network basis. Such a
technology could nurture the realignment of the securities market—or, reinvent it
altogether. Furthermore, the possibility of leveraging consensus-oriented execution
of computer code creates larger opportunities than that of a mere depository; it
allows for the creation of new, trustless markets where securities and their contractual
clauses are no longer merely legal obligations, rather, they are self-enforcing,
autonomous programs.
Here, we propose the overarching design choices suitable for a second-generation
blockchain platform for securities trading, devised to pursue interoperability within
the larger context of the effervescently evolving distributed ledger ecosystem, while
attempting to pay the necessary regard to the demands of regulatory compliance
within the securities industry.
[1]
Gareth W. Peters,et al.
Understanding Modern Banking Ledgers Through Blockchain Technologies: Future of Transaction Processing and Smart Contracts on the Internet of Money
,
2015,
ArXiv.
[2]
Aggelos Kiayias,et al.
The Bitcoin Backbone Protocol: Analysis and Applications
,
2015,
EUROCRYPT.
[3]
Jack Peterson,et al.
Augur: a decentralized, open-source platform for prediction markets
,
2015,
ArXiv.
[4]
Iddo Bentov,et al.
Proof of Activity: Extending Bitcoin's Proof of Work via Proof of Stake [Extended Abstract]y
,
2014,
PERV.
[5]
J. Dewland.
Reuters
,
2009
.
[6]
Nancy A. Lynch,et al.
Brewer's conjecture and the feasibility of consistent, available, partition-tolerant web services
,
2002,
SIGA.
[7]
Nancy A. Lynch,et al.
Consensus in the presence of partial synchrony
,
1988,
JACM.
[8]
Gabriel Bracha,et al.
Asynchronous Byzantine Agreement Protocols
,
1987,
Inf. Comput..
[9]
Ralph C. Merkle,et al.
A Digital Signature Based on a Conventional Encryption Function
,
1987,
CRYPTO.
[10]
R. Shostak,et al.
The Byzantine Generals Problem
,
1982,
TOPL.
[11]
Peter Duignan.
Stanford University
,
1966,
African Studies Bulletin.
[12]
A. Poelstra,et al.
On Stake and Consensus
,
2015
.
[13]
Joseph J. LaViola,et al.
Byzantine Consensus from Moderately-Hard Puzzles : A Model for Bitcoin
,
2014
.
[14]
S. Nakamoto,et al.
Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System
,
2008
.
[15]
S. Rehman.
The European Central Bank
,
1997
.
[16]
Parag A. Pathak,et al.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
,
1964,
Nature.
[17]
University College, London
,
1910,
Nature.