Control of robots sharing their workspace with humans: An energetic approach to safety

In this paper, we propose a physically meaningful energy-related safety indicator for robots sharing their workspace with humans. Based on this indicator, a safety criterion accounting for the breaking capabilities of the robot is included as a quadratic constraint in the control algorithm. This constraint is modulated by the distance between the human operator and the end-effector of the robot. The control algorithm is formulated as an optimization problem and computes the actuation torque of a robotic manipulator given some task to be performed and physical constraints to respect. The overall framework is validated in a physics simulation software on a Kuka LWR4 and different behaviours of the robot towards a considered obstacle in its environment are evaluated and discussed.

[1]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  The KUKA-DLR Lightweight Robot arm - a new reference platform for robotics research and manufacturing , 2010, ISR/ROBOTIK.

[2]  Alessandro De Luca,et al.  Collision detection and reaction: A contribution to safe physical Human-Robot Interaction , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[3]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  A truly safely moving robot has to know what injury it may cause , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[4]  Alessandro De Luca,et al.  Exploiting robot redundancy in collision detection and reaction , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[5]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  The DLR lightweight robot: design and control concepts for robots in human environments , 2007, Ind. Robot.

[6]  Vladimir J. Lumelsky,et al.  Real-time collision avoidance in teleoperated whole-sensitive robot arm manipulators , 1993, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[7]  G. Giralt,et al.  Safe and dependable physical human-robot interaction in anthropic domains: State of the art and challenges , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[8]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Rigid vs. elastic actuation: Requirements & performance , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[9]  Alessandro De Luca,et al.  Collision Detection and Safe Reaction with the DLR-III Lightweight Manipulator Arm , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[10]  Koji Ikuta,et al.  Safety Evaluation Method of Design and Control for Human-Care Robots , 2003, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[11]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  Inertial Properties in Robotic Manipulation: An Object-Level Framework , 1995, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[12]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  On a new generation of torque controlled light-weight robots , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[13]  Vincent Padois,et al.  Motion safety and constraints compatibility for multibody robots , 2012, Auton. Robots.

[14]  Dominik Henrich,et al.  Safe human-robot-cooperation: image-based collision detection for industrial robots , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[15]  Alexander Zelinsky,et al.  Quantitative Safety Guarantees for Physical Human-Robot Interaction , 2003, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[16]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  Playing it safe [human-friendly robots] , 2004, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[17]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.