Autonomous discovery in the chemical sciences part I: Progress
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Tim Chapman. Lab automation and robotics: Automation on the move , 2003, Nature.
[2] Edward O. Pyzer-Knapp,et al. Learning from the Harvard Clean Energy Project: The Use of Neural Networks to Accelerate Materials Discovery , 2015 .
[3] Magnus Rueping,et al. Self-Optimizing Reactor Systems: Algorithms, On-line Analytics, Setups, and Strategies for Accelerating Continuous Flow Process Optimization , 2014 .
[4] Bing Li,et al. Chemistry informer libraries: a chemoinformatics enabled approach to evaluate and advance synthetic methods† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c5sc04751j , 2016, Chemical science.
[5] Demis Hassabis,et al. Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge , 2017, Nature.
[6] Paul D Lyne,et al. Structure-based virtual screening: an overview. , 2002, Drug discovery today.
[7] Atsushi Sugimoto,et al. An automated-flow microreactor system for quick optimization and production: application of 10- and 100-gram order productions of a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor using a Sonogashira coupling reaction , 2009 .
[8] Antonio Lavecchia,et al. Machine-learning approaches in drug discovery: methods and applications. , 2015, Drug discovery today.
[9] Elizabeth Farrant,et al. Integrated Synthesis and Testing of Substituted Xanthine Based DPP4 Inhibitors: Application to Drug Discovery. , 2013, ACS medicinal chemistry letters.
[10] Clara D. Christ,et al. Mining Electronic Laboratory Notebooks: Analysis, Retrosynthesis, and Reaction Based Enumeration , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[11] G. Böhm,et al. Quantitative analysis of protein far UV circular dichroism spectra by neural networks. , 1992, Protein engineering.
[12] Stephen H. Muggleton,et al. 2020 Computing: Exceeding human limits , 2006, Nature.
[13] Kristin A. Persson,et al. Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation , 2013 .
[14] C. E. Berkoff,et al. Chemical process optimization by computer — a self-directed chemical synthesis system , 1978 .
[15] Piotr Giza,et al. Automated discovery systems and the inductivist controversy , 2017, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..
[16] A. Dömling,et al. The discovery of new isocyanide-based multi-component reactions. , 2000, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[17] Zachary W. Ulissi,et al. Active learning across intermetallics to guide discovery of electrocatalysts for CO2 reduction and H2 evolution , 2018, Nature Catalysis.
[18] Alexandr Zubov,et al. Closed-Loop Multitarget Optimization for Discovery of New Emulsion Polymerization Recipes , 2015, Organic process research & development.
[19] David R Spring,et al. Diversity-oriented synthesis. , 2009, Chemical record.
[20] Dragos Horvath,et al. In Silico Fragment-Based Drug Discovery: Setup and Validation of a Fragment-to-Lead Computational Protocol Using S4MPLE , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[21] Guido Sello,et al. Reaction prediction: the suggestions of the Beppe program , 1992, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[22] F. Arnold. Design by Directed Evolution , 1998 .
[23] Anthony D. Keefe,et al. DNA-encoded chemistry: enabling the deeper sampling of chemical space , 2016, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[24] Anthony P. F. Cook,et al. Computer‐aided synthesis design: 40 years on , 2012 .
[25] John C. deMello,et al. Tuning reaction products by constrained optimisation , 2017 .
[26] Anat Milo,et al. The Development of Multidimensional Analysis Tools for Asymmetric Catalysis and Beyond. , 2016, Accounts of chemical research.
[27] Robert Langer,et al. High throughput methods applied in biomaterial development and discovery. , 2010, Biomaterials.
[28] Jian Ji,et al. Software Tools and Approaches for Compound Identification of LC-MS/MS Data in Metabolomics , 2018, Metabolites.
[29] Klavs F. Jensen,et al. Optimum catalyst selection over continuous and discrete process variables with a single droplet microfluidic reaction platform , 2018 .
[30] Stefano Curtarolo,et al. High-throughput electronic band structure calculations: Challenges and tools , 2010, 1004.2974.
[31] Dragos Horvath,et al. Expert System for Predicting Reaction Conditions: The Michael Reaction Case , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[32] W. Janzen,et al. Screening technologies for small molecule discovery: the state of the art. , 2014, Chemistry & biology.
[33] Galit Shmueli,et al. To Explain or To Predict? , 2010, 1101.0891.
[34] Marta M. Stepniewska-Dziubinska,et al. Development and evaluation of a deep learning model for protein–ligand binding affinity prediction , 2017, Bioinform..
[35] Gisbert Schneider,et al. Virtual screening: an endless staircase? , 2010, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[36] Cícero Nogueira dos Santos,et al. Boosting Docking-Based Virtual Screening with Deep Learning , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[37] Leroy Cronin,et al. Intuition-Enabled Machine Learning Beats the Competition When Joint Human-Robot Teams Perform Inorganic Chemical Experiments , 2019, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[38] Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al. The Harvard Clean Energy Project: Large-Scale Computational Screening and Design of Organic Photovoltaics on the World Community Grid , 2011 .
[39] Eric S Isbrandt,et al. High Throughput Strategies for the Discovery and Optimization of Catalytic Reactions. , 2019, Angewandte Chemie.
[40] A. Hopkins,et al. Navigating chemical space for biology and medicine , 2004, Nature.
[41] Wilhelm F. Maier,et al. IR‐thermographische Erkennung katalytischer Aktivität in kombinatorischen Bibliotheken heterogener Katalysatoren , 1998 .
[42] Anthony Goodrow,et al. Transition state-finding strategies for use with the growing string method. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.
[43] Diogo M. Camacho,et al. Next-Generation Machine Learning for Biological Networks , 2018, Cell.
[44] Stefanie Jegelka,et al. Virtual screening of inorganic materials synthesis parameters with deep learning , 2017, npj Computational Materials.
[45] Tsuyoshi Murata,et al. {m , 1934, ACML.
[46] Thomas F. Miller,et al. Transferability in Machine Learning for Electronic Structure via the Molecular Orbital Basis. , 2018, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[47] Shinji Nagasawa,et al. Computer-Aided Screening of Conjugated Polymers for Organic Solar Cell: Classification by Random Forest. , 2018, The journal of physical chemistry letters.
[48] Michael H. Abraham,et al. Linear solvation energy relations , 1985 .
[49] Liping Yu,et al. Prediction and accelerated laboratory discovery of previously unknown 18-electron ABX compounds. , 2014, Nature chemistry.
[50] William H. Green,et al. Using Machine Learning To Predict Suitable Conditions for Organic Reactions , 2018, ACS central science.
[51] Peter Stone,et al. Reinforcement learning , 2019, Scholarpedia.
[52] Zengin,et al. High-Throughput Testing of Heterogeneous Catalyst Libraries Using Array Microreactors and Mass Spectrometry. , 1999, Angewandte Chemie.
[53] Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al. Closed-loop discovery platform integration is needed for artificial intelligence to make an impact in drug discovery , 2018, Expert opinion on drug discovery.
[54] Dimitris C. Lagoudas,et al. Multi-objective Bayesian materials discovery: Application on the discovery of precipitation strengthened NiTi shape memory alloys through micromechanical modeling , 2018, Materials & Design.
[55] Zhengrong Zhu,et al. Application of encoded library technology (ELT) to a protein-protein interaction target: discovery of a potent class of integrin lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 (LFA-1) antagonists. , 2014, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.
[56] Petra Schneider,et al. From Complex Natural Products to Simple Synthetic Mimetics by Computational De Novo Design. , 2016, Angewandte Chemie.
[57] Robert F. Murphy,et al. Efficient Modeling and Active Learning Discovery of Biological Responses , 2013, PloS one.
[58] M J Sternberg,et al. Structure-activity relationships derived by machine learning: the use of atoms and their bond connectivities to predict mutagenicity by inductive logic programming. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[59] Kevin K. Yang,et al. Machine-learning-guided directed evolution for protein engineering , 2018, Nature Methods.
[60] C. Jochum,et al. Neue Anwendungsgebiete für Computer in der Chemie , 1979 .
[61] Johann Gasteiger,et al. Computer-assisted prediction of the degradation of chemicals: hydrolysis of amides and benzoylphenylureas , 1995 .
[62] Luhua Lai,et al. LigBuilder: A Multi-Purpose Program for Structure-Based Drug Design , 2000 .
[63] A. Johnson,et al. Some recent progress in the development of the LHASA computer system for organic synthesis design: Starting‐material‐oriented retrosynthetic analysis , 1992 .
[64] Chien-Hsiu Lee,et al. Artificial intelligence in research. , 2017, Science.
[65] Sereina Riniker,et al. Similarity maps - a visualization strategy for molecular fingerprints and machine-learning methods , 2013, Journal of Cheminformatics.
[66] Raúl E. Valdés-Pérez,et al. Principles of Human Computer Collaboration for Knowledge Discovery in Science , 1999, Artif. Intell..
[67] Venkat Venkatasubramanian,et al. Computer-aided molecular design using genetic algorithms , 1994 .
[68] Markus Reiher,et al. Error-Controlled Exploration of Chemical Reaction Networks with Gaussian Processes. , 2018, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[69] K. Tsuda,et al. Hunting for Organic Molecules with Artificial Intelligence: Molecules Optimized for Desired Excitation Energies , 2018, ACS central science.
[70] J. Frearson,et al. HTS and hit finding in academia – from chemical genomics to drug discovery , 2009, Drug discovery today.
[71] M. Rupp,et al. Machine learning of molecular electronic properties in chemical compound space , 2013, 1305.7074.
[72] Gregor Urban,et al. Deep learning for chemical reaction prediction , 2018 .
[73] William H. Green,et al. Unimolecular Reaction Pathways of a γ-Ketohydroperoxide from Combined Application of Automated Reaction Discovery Methods. , 2018, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[74] Reiner Sebastian Sprick,et al. Mapping Binary Copolymer Property Space with Neural Networks , 2019 .
[75] Yan Li,et al. Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions: The CASF-2016 Update , 2018, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[76] Isabelle Guyon,et al. An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[77] Johann Gasteiger,et al. EROS A computer program for generating sequences of reactions , 1978 .
[78] Edmund L. Gettier. Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? , 1963, Arguing About Knowledge.
[79] Ryan P. Adams,et al. Design of efficient molecular organic light-emitting diodes by a high-throughput virtual screening and experimental approach. , 2016, Nature materials.
[80] Michael Becker,et al. Eine Methode zum High‐Throughput‐Screening von enantioselektiven Katalysatoren , 1999 .
[81] Igor I. Baskin,et al. Structure-reactivity relationships in terms of the condensed graphs of reactions , 2014, Russian Journal of Organic Chemistry.
[82] Connor W. Coley,et al. SCScore: Synthetic Complexity Learned from a Reaction Corpus , 2018, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[83] Pedro J Ballester,et al. Machine‐learning scoring functions to improve structure‐based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening , 2015, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational molecular science.
[84] Friedrich Rippmann,et al. Interpretable Deep Learning in Drug Discovery , 2019, Explainable AI.
[85] Ross D. King,et al. Cheaper faster drug development validated by the repositioning of drugs against neglected tropical diseases , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.
[86] John H. Holland,et al. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .
[87] Robert Langer,et al. Parallel synthesis and biophysical characterization of a degradable polymer library for gene delivery. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[88] Noam Bernstein,et al. Realistic Atomistic Structure of Amorphous Silicon from Machine-Learning-Driven Molecular Dynamics. , 2018, The journal of physical chemistry letters.
[89] Brian L. DeCost,et al. Accelerating Photovoltaic Materials Development via High-Throughput Experiments and Machine-Learning-Assisted Diagnosis , 2018, 1812.01025.
[90] Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al. Automatic Chemical Design Using a Data-Driven Continuous Representation of Molecules , 2016, ACS central science.
[91] Klaus-Robert Müller,et al. Assessment and Validation of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Molecular Atomization Energies. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[92] Keith T. Taylor,et al. ROBIA: a reaction prediction program. , 2005, Organic letters.
[93] Johann Gasteiger,et al. Computer‐Assisted Planning of Organic Syntheses: The Second Generation of Programs , 1996 .
[94] Dario Neri,et al. 20 years of DNA-encoded chemical libraries. , 2011, Chemical communications.
[95] B. Meredig,et al. Materials science with large-scale data and informatics: Unlocking new opportunities , 2016 .
[96] John F. Hartwig,et al. A Simple, Multidimensional Approach to High-Throughput Discovery of Catalytic Reactions , 2011, Science.
[97] Lu Zhang,et al. From machine learning to deep learning: progress in machine intelligence for rational drug discovery. , 2017, Drug discovery today.
[98] Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al. Phoenics: A Bayesian Optimizer for Chemistry , 2018, ACS central science.
[99] William Stafford Noble,et al. Machine learning applications in genetics and genomics , 2015, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[100] D. Thompson,et al. High throughput reaction screening using desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c7sc04606e , 2018, Chemical science.
[101] Matthew R. Hill,et al. Materials Genome in Action: Identifying the Performance Limits of Physical Hydrogen Storage , 2017, Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society.
[102] Junzo Otera,et al. Automated Synthesis: Development of a New Apparatus Friendly to Synthetic Chemists (MEDLEY) , 2000 .
[103] Steven V Ley,et al. Continuous flow reaction monitoring using an on-line miniature mass spectrometer. , 2012, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.
[104] Anne E Carpenter,et al. CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes , 2006, Genome Biology.
[105] Andrew McCallum,et al. Inorganic Materials Synthesis Planning with Literature-Trained Neural Networks , 2018, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[106] Katharine M. Flores,et al. High-throughput discovery and characterization of multicomponent bulk metallic glass alloys , 2016 .
[107] Andrew I. Cooper,et al. Functional materials discovery using energy–structure–function maps , 2017, Nature.
[108] Alexei Lapkin,et al. Automatic discovery and optimization of chemical processes , 2015 .
[109] Michael Gastegger,et al. Machine learning molecular dynamics for the simulation of infrared spectra† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c7sc02267k , 2017, Chemical science.
[110] Radford M. Neal. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.
[111] Rafael Gómez-Bombarelli,et al. Variational Coarse-Graining for Molecular Dynamics , 2018, ArXiv.
[112] Anne E Carpenter,et al. Opportunities and obstacles for deep learning in biology and medicine , 2017, bioRxiv.
[113] J. Reymond. The chemical space project. , 2015, Accounts of chemical research.
[114] Chenru Duan,et al. Strategies and Software for Machine Learning Accelerated Discovery in Transition Metal Chemistry , 2018, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research.
[115] Krishna Rajan,et al. Combinatorial Materials Sciences: Experimental Strategies for Accelerated Knowledge Discovery , 2008 .
[116] Mathew D. Halls,et al. High-throughput quantum chemistry and virtual screening for lithium ion battery electrolyte additives , 2010 .
[117] Regina Barzilay,et al. Prediction of Organic Reaction Outcomes Using Machine Learning , 2017, ACS central science.
[118] Klavs F. Jensen,et al. Automated Multitrajectory Method for Reaction Optimization in a Microfluidic System using Online IR Analysis , 2012 .
[119] Plamen Angelov,et al. RetroTransformDB: A Dataset of Generic Transforms for Retrosynthetic Analysis , 2018, Data.
[120] Kevin Bateman,et al. Nanomole-scale high-throughput chemistry for the synthesis of complex molecules , 2015, Science.
[121] J. Dearden,et al. QSAR modeling: where have you been? Where are you going to? , 2014, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[122] William H Green,et al. Automated Discovery of Elementary Chemical Reaction Steps Using Freezing String and Berny Optimization Methods. , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[123] Mary L. Cummings,et al. Collaborative Human-Automation Decision Making , 2009, Handbook of Automation.
[124] Ross D. King,et al. Yeast-based automated high-throughput screens to identify anti-parasitic lead compounds , 2013, Open Biology.
[125] A. deMello,et al. Intelligent routes to the controlled synthesis of nanoparticles. , 2007, Lab on a chip.
[126] J. Wulff,et al. Reinvestigation of a robotically revealed reaction , 2019, Nature.
[127] C. Adjiman,et al. Computer-aided molecular design of solvents for accelerated reaction kinetics. , 2013, Nature chemistry.
[128] James Theiler,et al. Adaptive Strategies for Materials Design using Uncertainties , 2016, Scientific Reports.
[129] Richard N. Zare,et al. Optimizing Chemical Reactions with Deep Reinforcement Learning , 2017, ACS central science.
[130] James Theiler,et al. Accelerated search for materials with targeted properties by adaptive design , 2016, Nature Communications.
[131] Marwin H. S. Segler,et al. Modelling Chemical Reasoning to Predict Reactions , 2016, Chemistry.
[132] J S Smith,et al. ANI-1: an extensible neural network potential with DFT accuracy at force field computational cost , 2016, Chemical science.
[133] Lorenz M Mayr,et al. Novel trends in high-throughput screening. , 2009, Current opinion in pharmacology.
[134] Kipton Barros,et al. Approaching coupled cluster accuracy with a general-purpose neural network potential through transfer learning , 2019, Nature Communications.
[135] Gus L. W. Hart,et al. Accelerating high-throughput searches for new alloys with active learning of interatomic potentials , 2018, Computational Materials Science.
[136] Yang Wang,et al. Prediction of higher-selectivity catalysts by computer-driven workflow and machine learning , 2019, Science.
[137] 福井 謙一,et al. Frontier orbitals and reaction paths : selected papers of Kenichi Fukui , 1997 .
[138] Christopher J. Welch,et al. MISER chromatography (multiple injections in a single experimental run): the chromatogram is the graph , 2010 .
[139] Sergey Nikolenko,et al. druGAN: An Advanced Generative Adversarial Autoencoder Model for de Novo Generation of New Molecules with Desired Molecular Properties in Silico. , 2017, Molecular pharmaceutics.
[140] David A. Price,et al. Ligand biological activity predicted by cleaning positive and negative chemical correlations , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[141] Johann Gasteiger,et al. Neural networks and genetic algorithms in drug design , 2001 .
[142] Gisbert Schneider,et al. Designing Anticancer Peptides by Constructive Machine Learning , 2018, ChemMedChem.
[143] David R. Liu,et al. Reaction discovery enabled by DNA-templated synthesis and in vitro selection , 2004, Nature.
[144] H. Simon,et al. Studying Scientific Discovery by Computer Simulation , 1983, Science.
[145] Yanli Wang,et al. Structure-Based Virtual Screening for Drug Discovery: a Problem-Centric Review , 2012, The AAPS Journal.
[146] Robert Tibshirani,et al. Chemical Space Mimicry for Drug Discovery , 2017, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[147] Adrià Cereto-Massagué,et al. Molecular fingerprint similarity search in virtual screening. , 2015, Methods.
[148] Johann Gasteiger,et al. Prediction of 1H NMR chemical shifts using neural networks. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.
[149] A. Aspuru-Guzik,et al. Self-driving laboratory for accelerated discovery of thin-film materials , 2019, Science Advances.
[150] R. Lerner,et al. Encoded combinatorial chemistry. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[151] Klaus Gubernator,et al. Optimization of the Biological Activity of Combinatorial Compound Libraries by a Genetic Algorithm , 1995 .
[152] Mark Peplow,et al. Organic synthesis: The robo-chemist , 2014, Nature.
[153] Esben J. Bjerrum,et al. Machine learning optimization of cross docking accuracy , 2016, Comput. Biol. Chem..
[154] David E. Clark,et al. Evolutionary algorithms in computer-aided molecular design , 1996, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[155] L. Hammett. The Effect of Structure upon the Reactions of Organic Compounds. Benzene Derivatives , 1937 .
[156] Christine L. Andrews,et al. Nanoscale synthesis and affinity ranking , 2018, Nature.
[157] Derek T. Ahneman,et al. Predicting reaction performance in C–N cross-coupling using machine learning , 2018, Science.
[158] Piotr Dittwald,et al. Discovery and Enumeration of Organic-Chemical and Biomimetic Reaction Cycles within the Network of Chemistry. , 2018, Angewandte Chemie.
[159] Joshua Schrier,et al. Understanding structural adaptability: a reactant informatics approach to experiment design , 2018 .
[160] Michele Parrinello,et al. Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. , 2007, Physical review letters.
[161] Bruce G. Buchanan,et al. Heuristic DENDRAL - A program for generating explanatory hypotheses in organic chemistry. , 1968 .
[162] M. Scheffler,et al. Insightful classification of crystal structures using deep learning , 2017, Nature Communications.
[163] A. Verloop,et al. THE STERIMOL APPROACH: FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF THE METHOD AND NEW APPLICATIONS , 1983 .
[164] Sebastian Böcker,et al. Bayesian networks for mass spectrometric metabolite identification via molecular fingerprints , 2018, Bioinform..
[165] Johannes T. Margraf,et al. Systematic Enumeration of Elementary Reaction Steps in Surface Catalysis , 2019, ACS omega.
[166] Anatoly G Artemenko,et al. Interpretation of QSAR Models Based on Random Forest Methods , 2011, Molecular informatics.
[167] Tomasz Arodz,et al. Computational methods in developing quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR): a review. , 2006, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.
[168] Jeffrey Y. Pan,et al. An Integrated Synthesis-Purification System to Accelerate the Generation of Compounds in Pharmaceutical Discovery , 2011 .
[169] Markus Hartenfeller,et al. DOGS: Reaction-Driven de novo Design of Bioactive Compounds , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[170] Benjamin M. Gyori,et al. From word models to executable models of signaling networks using automated assembly , 2017, bioRxiv.
[171] Paul Richardson,et al. A platform for automated nanomole-scale reaction screening and micromole-scale synthesis in flow , 2018, Science.
[172] Jingfa Li,et al. Data mining new energy materials from structure databases , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
[173] Alexander G. Godfrey,et al. A remote-controlled adaptive medchem lab: an innovative approach to enable drug discovery in the 21st Century. , 2013, Drug discovery today.
[174] Piotr Dittwald,et al. Efficient Syntheses of Diverse, Medicinally Relevant Targets Planned by Computer and Executed in the Laboratory , 2018 .
[175] Petra Schneider,et al. Von komplexen Naturstoffen zu synthetisch leicht zugänglichen Mimetika mithilfe von computergestütztem De‐novo‐Design , 2016 .
[176] Constantine Bekas,et al. “Found in Translation”: predicting outcomes of complex organic chemistry reactions using neural sequence-to-sequence models† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Time-split test set and example predictions, together with attention weights, confidence and token probabilities. See DO , 2017, Chemical science.
[177] Raúl E. Valdés-Pérez,et al. Conjecturing Hidden Entities by Means of Simplicity and Conservation Laws: Machine Discovery in Chemistry , 1994, Artif. Intell..
[178] Dean J Tantillo,et al. The many roles of quantum chemical predictions in synthetic organic chemistry. , 2014, Chemistry, an Asian journal.
[179] Adrian E. Roitberg,et al. Less is more: sampling chemical space with active learning , 2018, The Journal of chemical physics.
[180] Petra Schneider,et al. De novo design of molecular architectures by evolutionary assembly of drug-derived building blocks , 2000, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[181] J. I. Goldsmith,et al. Discovery and high-throughput screening of heteroleptic iridium complexes for photoinduced hydrogen production. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[182] Esben Jannik Bjerrum,et al. Molecular Generation with Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) , 2017, ArXiv.
[183] Daniel W. Davies,et al. Machine learning for molecular and materials science , 2018, Nature.
[184] Jason D. Williams,et al. Laboratory of the future: a modular flow platform with multiple integrated PAT tools for multistep reactions , 2019, Reaction Chemistry & Engineering.
[185] P. Rinke,et al. Data‐Driven Materials Science: Status, Challenges, and Perspectives , 2019, Advanced science.
[186] Klavs F. Jensen,et al. Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling optimization enabled by automated feedback , 2016, Reaction chemistry & engineering.
[187] Scott E. Denmark,et al. Catalytic enantioselective cyclopropanation with bis(halomethyl)zinc reagents. I. Optimization of reaction protocol , 1995 .
[188] J. Nørskov,et al. Combined electronic structure and evolutionary search approach to materials design. , 2002, Physical review letters.
[189] Derek T. Ahneman,et al. Deoxyfluorination with Sulfonyl Fluorides: Navigating Reaction Space with Machine Learning. , 2018, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[190] Hans-Werner Schmidt,et al. Detection of Catalytic Activity in Combinatorial Libraries of Heterogeneous Catalysts by IR Thermography. , 1998, Angewandte Chemie.
[191] Sepp Hochreiter,et al. Fréchet ChemNet Distance: A Metric for Generative Models for Molecules in Drug Discovery , 2018, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[192] D. Weitz,et al. Droplet microfluidics for high-throughput biological assays. , 2012, Lab on a chip.
[193] Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al. Neural Networks for the Prediction of Organic Chemistry Reactions , 2016, ACS central science.
[194] Martin D. Burke,et al. Synthesis of many different types of organic small molecules using one automated process , 2015, Science.
[195] John H. Holland,et al. Outline for a Logical Theory of Adaptive Systems , 1962, JACM.
[196] Nathan Brown,et al. MOARF, an Integrated Workflow for Multiobjective Optimization: Implementation, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[197] Klavs F Jensen,et al. Integrated microreactors for reaction automation: new approaches to reaction development. , 2010, Annual review of analytical chemistry.
[198] Scott Habershon,et al. Automatic Proposal of Multistep Reaction Mechanisms using a Graph-Driven Search. , 2019, The journal of physical chemistry. A.
[199] Andrew C. Good,et al. An Empirical Process for the Design of High-Throughput Screening Deck Filters , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[200] Gerbrand Ceder,et al. Constructing first-principles phase diagrams of amorphous LixSi using machine-learning-assisted sampling with an evolutionary algorithm. , 2018, The Journal of chemical physics.
[201] F. Glorius,et al. Durch sichtbares Licht vermittelte Funktionalisierungen von Benzotriazolen, inspiriert durch mechanismusbasiertes Lumineszenz‐ Screening , 2017 .
[202] John P. Overington,et al. ChEMBL: a large-scale bioactivity database for drug discovery , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..
[203] Robert P. Sheridan,et al. Random Forest: A Classification and Regression Tool for Compound Classification and QSAR Modeling , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[204] Frank Glorius,et al. Contemporary screening approaches to reaction discovery and development. , 2014, Nature chemistry.
[205] Abhinav Vishnu,et al. Deep learning for computational chemistry , 2017, J. Comput. Chem..
[206] Ryosuke Jinnouchi,et al. Predicting Catalytic Activity of Nanoparticles by a DFT-Aided Machine-Learning Algorithm. , 2017, The journal of physical chemistry letters.
[207] Gisbert Schneider,et al. De Novo Design of Bioactive Small Molecules by Artificial Intelligence , 2018, Molecular informatics.
[208] Connor W. Coley,et al. Machine Learning in Computer-Aided Synthesis Planning. , 2018, Accounts of chemical research.
[209] Sanjeev Garg,et al. Multiobjective optimization of a free radical bulk polymerization reactor using genetic algorithm , 1999 .
[210] Ken E. Whelan,et al. The Automation of Science , 2009, Science.
[211] D. Horvath,et al. Predictive Models for Kinetic Parameters of Cycloaddition Reactions , 2018, Molecular informatics.
[212] Pierre Baldi,et al. ReactionPredictor: Prediction of Complex Chemical Reactions at the Mechanistic Level Using Machine Learning , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[213] J. Baell,et al. New substructure filters for removal of pan assay interference compounds (PAINS) from screening libraries and for their exclusion in bioassays. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[214] Fengqi You,et al. In silico discovery of metal-organic frameworks for precombustion CO2 capture using a genetic algorithm , 2016, Science Advances.
[215] Thomas Lengauer,et al. A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.
[216] D. Klahr,et al. Heuristics for Scientific Experimentation: A Developmental Study , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.
[217] Floris P. J. T. Rutjes,et al. Optimizing the Deprotection of the Amine Protecting p-Methoxyphenyl Group in an Automated Microreactor Platform , 2009 .
[218] Yang Liu,et al. Route Designer: A Retrosynthetic Analysis Tool Utilizing Automated Retrosynthetic Rule Generation , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[219] John S. Schreck,et al. Learning Retrosynthetic Planning through Simulated Experience , 2019, ACS central science.
[220] C. Wilmer,et al. Large-scale screening of hypothetical metal-organic frameworks. , 2012, Nature chemistry.
[221] A. M. Turing,et al. Computing Machinery and Intelligence , 1950, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.
[222] Jerome G. P. Wicker,et al. Will it crystallise? Predicting crystallinity of molecular materials , 2015 .
[223] Bentley M Wingert,et al. Improving small molecule virtual screening strategies for the next generation of therapeutics. , 2018, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[224] Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al. Lead candidates for high-performance organic photovoltaics from high-throughput quantum chemistry – the Harvard Clean Energy Project , 2014 .
[225] Zeng Zeng,et al. Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Polymers Property Prediction , 2018, ArXiv.
[226] Bilge Baytekin,et al. Estimating chemical reactivity and cross-influence from collective chemical knowledge , 2012 .
[227] Alexandre Varnek,et al. Automatized Assessment of Protective Group Reactivity: A Step Toward Big Reaction Data Analysis , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[228] James A. Platts,et al. Estimation of Molecular Linear Free Energy Relation Descriptors Using a Group Contribution Approach , 1999, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[229] Jun Li,et al. Making Better Decisions During Synthetic Route Design: Leveraging Prediction to Achieve Greenness-by-Design , 2019, Reaction Chemistry & Engineering.
[230] Ryo Shimizu,et al. Virtual Screening System for Finding Structurally Diverse Hits by Active Learning , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[231] Richard J Ingham,et al. Organic synthesis: march of the machines. , 2015, Angewandte Chemie.
[232] João Aires-de-Sousa,et al. Prediction of 1H NMR Coupling Constants with Associative Neural Networks Trained for Chemical Shifts , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[233] Guido Koch,et al. A segmented flow platform for on-demand medicinal chemistry and compound synthesis in oscillating droplets. , 2017, Chemical communications.
[234] Matthew H Todd,et al. Computer-aided organic synthesis. , 2005, Chemical Society reviews.
[235] Carlos Mateos,et al. Automated platforms for reaction self-optimization in flow , 2019, Reaction Chemistry & Engineering.
[236] J. Kazius,et al. Derivation and validation of toxicophores for mutagenicity prediction. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[237] Dragos Horvath,et al. CovaDOTS: In Silico Chemistry-Driven Tool to Design Covalent Inhibitors Using a Linking Strategy , 2019, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[238] Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al. ChemOS: Orchestrating autonomous experimentation , 2018, Science Robotics.
[239] Heather J Kulik,et al. Accelerating Chemical Discovery with Machine Learning: Simulated Evolution of Spin Crossover Complexes with an Artificial Neural Network. , 2018, The journal of physical chemistry letters.
[240] P. Bork,et al. Literature mining for the biologist: from information retrieval to biological discovery , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[241] Sebastian Böcker,et al. Mining molecular structure databases: Identification of small molecules based on fragmentation mass spectrometry data. , 2017, Mass spectrometry reviews.
[242] G Oskarsdottir,et al. Parallel analysis of the reaction products from combinatorial catalyst libraries. , 2001, Angewandte Chemie.
[243] Donald R. Jones,et al. Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions , 1998, J. Glob. Optim..
[244] Tudor I. Oprea,et al. Chemography: the Art of Navigating in Chemical Space , 2000 .
[245] Gisbert Schneider,et al. Active-learning strategies in computer-assisted drug discovery. , 2015, Drug discovery today.
[246] Demis Hassabis,et al. A general reinforcement learning algorithm that masters chess, shogi, and Go through self-play , 2018, Science.
[247] Hao Wu,et al. VAMPnets for deep learning of molecular kinetics , 2017, Nature Communications.
[248] Atsuto Seko,et al. Machine learning with systematic density-functional theory calculations: Application to melting temperatures of single- and binary-component solids , 2013, 1310.1546.
[249] John H. Holland,et al. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .
[250] Randall Q. Snurr,et al. High-Throughput Screening of Porous Crystalline Materials for Hydrogen Storage Capacity near Room Temperature , 2014 .
[251] J. Hartwig,et al. Snap deconvolution: An informatics approach to high-throughput discovery of catalytic reactions , 2017, Science.
[252] Jinlan Wang,et al. Accelerated discovery of stable lead-free hybrid organic-inorganic perovskites via machine learning , 2018, Nature Communications.
[253] Ji-Cheng Zhao. Combinatorial approaches as effective tools in the study of phase diagrams and composition-structure-property relationships , 2006 .
[254] Frank Glorius,et al. Diverse Visible-Light-Promoted Functionalizations of Benzotriazoles Inspired by Mechanism-Based Luminescence Screening. , 2017, Angewandte Chemie.
[255] C. Woodward,et al. Accelerated exploration of multi-principal element alloys with solid solution phases , 2015, Nature Communications.
[256] Yurii S. Moroz,et al. Ultra-large library docking for discovering new chemotypes , 2019, Nature.
[257] Baoguang Zhao,et al. Design, synthesis and selection of DNA-encoded small-molecule libraries. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.
[258] Geoffrey R Akien,et al. Online quantitative mass spectrometry for the rapid adaptive optimisation of automated flow reactors , 2016 .
[259] Igor I. Baskin,et al. Machine Learning Methods for Property Prediction in Chemoinformatics: Quo Vadis? , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[260] J. Suykens,et al. A tutorial on support vector machine-based methods for classification problems in chemometrics. , 2010, Analytica chimica acta.
[261] T. Lookman,et al. Accelerated Discovery of Large Electrostrains in BaTiO3‐Based Piezoelectrics Using Active Learning , 2018, Advanced materials.
[262] Eugene N Muratov,et al. Universal Approach for Structural Interpretation of QSAR/QSPR Models , 2013, Molecular informatics.
[263] Junmei Wang,et al. Development and testing of a general amber force field , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..
[264] S. Schreiber,et al. Target-oriented and diversity-oriented organic synthesis in drug discovery. , 2000, Science.
[265] Wujie Wang,et al. Coarse-graining auto-encoders for molecular dynamics , 2018, npj Computational Materials.
[266] Paul M Zimmerman,et al. Efficient exploration of reaction paths via a freezing string method. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.
[267] Gisbert Schneider,et al. Computer-based de novo design of drug-like molecules , 2005, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[268] Gisbert Schneider,et al. Recurrent Neural Network Model for Constructive Peptide Design , 2018, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[269] Arthur W. Westerberg,et al. DECADE—a hybrid expert system for catalyst selection—II. Final architecture and results , 1988 .
[270] Ichiro Takeuchi,et al. Applications of high throughput (combinatorial) methodologies to electronic, magnetic, optical, and energy-related materials , 2013 .
[271] Charlotte Truchet,et al. An autonomous self-optimizing flow machine for the synthesis of pyridine–oxazoline (PyOX) ligands , 2019, Reaction Chemistry & Engineering.
[272] Bowen Liu,et al. Retrosynthetic Reaction Prediction Using Neural Sequence-to-Sequence Models , 2017, ACS central science.
[273] Leroy Cronin,et al. How to explore chemical space using algorithms and automation , 2019, Nature Reviews Chemistry.
[274] Dmitry Vetrov,et al. Entangled Conditional Adversarial Autoencoder for de Novo Drug Discovery. , 2018, Molecular pharmaceutics.
[275] Magnus Rueping,et al. Machine assisted reaction optimization: A self-optimizing reactor system for continuous-flow photochemical reactions , 2018, Tetrahedron.
[276] Erin Antono,et al. Building Data-driven Models with Microstructural Images: Generalization and Interpretability , 2017, ArXiv.
[277] Shun Su,et al. Discovery of chemical reactions through multidimensional screening. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[278] Christopher K Prier,et al. Discovery of an α-Amino C–H Arylation Reaction Using the Strategy of Accelerated Serendipity , 2011, Science.
[279] B. Grzybowski,et al. Rewiring chemistry: algorithmic discovery and experimental validation of one-pot reactions in the network of organic chemistry. , 2012, Angewandte Chemie.
[280] Wei Zheng,et al. A Cell-Based Ultra-High-Throughput Screening Assay for Identifying Inhibitors of D-Amino Acid Oxidase , 2006, Journal of biomolecular screening.
[281] Peter Willett,et al. Similarity-based virtual screening using 2D fingerprints. , 2006, Drug discovery today.
[282] Maria Liakata,et al. Towards Robot Scientists for autonomous scientific discovery , 2010, Automated experimentation.
[283] Haijun Jiao,et al. Mechanism of Graphene Formation via Detonation Synthesis: A DFTB Nanoreactor Approach. , 2019, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[284] Marco Buongiorno Nardelli,et al. The high-throughput highway to computational materials design. , 2013, Nature materials.
[285] Peter G. Schultz,et al. A Combinatorial Approach to Materials Discovery , 1995, Science.
[286] D. Goodsell,et al. Automated docking of substrates to proteins by simulated annealing , 1990, Proteins.
[287] Russ Greiner,et al. Competitive fragmentation modeling of ESI-MS/MS spectra for putative metabolite identification , 2013, Metabolomics.
[288] Thomas F. Miller,et al. A Universal Density Matrix Functional from Molecular Orbital-Based Machine Learning: Transferability across Organic Molecules , 2019, The Journal of chemical physics.
[289] William P Flanagan,et al. Development of combinatorial chemistry methods for coatings: high-throughput adhesion evaluation and scale-up of combinatorial leads. , 2003, Journal of combinatorial chemistry.
[290] C. Reichardt. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry , 1988 .
[291] Svetha Venkatesh,et al. Hybrid Generative-Discriminative Models for Inverse Materials Design , 2018, ArXiv.
[292] Gisbert Schneider,et al. Automated de novo molecular design by hybrid machine intelligence and rule-driven chemical synthesis , 2019, Nature Machine Intelligence.
[293] Artur M. Schweidtmann,et al. Machine learning meets continuous flow chemistry: Automated optimization towards the Pareto front of multiple objectives , 2018, Chemical Engineering Journal.
[294] Petra Mutzel,et al. CHIPMUNK: A Virtual Synthesizable Small‐Molecule Library for Medicinal Chemistry, Exploitable for Protein–Protein Interaction Modulators , 2018, ChemMedChem.
[295] Johann Gasteiger,et al. A Graph-Based Genetic Algorithm and Its Application to the Multiobjective Evolution of Median Molecules , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[296] Elizabeth Farrant,et al. Rapid discovery of a novel series of Abl kinase inhibitors by application of an integrated microfluidic synthesis and screening platform. , 2013, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[297] P Willett,et al. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.
[298] Hod Lipson,et al. Distilling Free-Form Natural Laws from Experimental Data , 2009, Science.
[299] Kamal Kumar,et al. Scaffold Diversity Synthesis and Its Application in Probe and Drug Discovery. , 2016, Angewandte Chemie.
[300] A. McCallum,et al. Materials Synthesis Insights from Scientific Literature via Text Extraction and Machine Learning , 2017 .
[301] Herbert A. Simon,et al. Scientific discovery: compulalional explorations of the creative process , 1987 .
[302] Herbert A. Simon,et al. The Processes of Scientific Discovery: The Strategy of Experimentation , 1988, Cogn. Sci..
[303] John A. Nelder,et al. A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..
[304] Stanley N. Deming,et al. Automated instrumental system for fundamental characterization of chemical reactions , 1971 .
[305] Selim M. Senkan,et al. High-throughput screening of solid-state catalyst libraries , 1998, Nature.
[306] Jonathan P. McMullen,et al. Rapid Determination of Reaction Kinetics with an Automated Microfluidic System , 2011 .
[307] Michael W. George,et al. Real-Time Feedback Control Using Online Attenuated Total Reflection Fourier Transform Infrared (ATR FT-IR) Spectroscopy for Continuous Flow Optimization and Process Knowledge , 2013, Applied spectroscopy.
[308] Deepak Bandyopadhyay,et al. DNA-Encoded Library Screening Identifies Benzo[b][1,4]oxazepin-4-ones as Highly Potent and Monoselective Receptor Interacting Protein 1 Kinase Inhibitors. , 2016, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[309] Chris M Snively,et al. Parallelanalyse der Reaktionsprodukte von Katalysatorbibliotheken , 2001 .
[310] John G. Moffat,et al. Phenotypic screening in cancer drug discovery — past, present and future , 2014, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[311] Luke E K Achenie,et al. High-throughput screening of bimetallic catalysts enabled by machine learning , 2017 .
[312] Orr Ravitz,et al. Data-driven computer aided synthesis design. , 2013, Drug discovery today. Technologies.
[313] R. Cooks,et al. Ambient Mass Spectrometry , 2006, Science.
[314] Andrew L. Ferguson,et al. Machine learning for autonomous crystal structure identification. , 2017, Soft matter.
[315] Gianni De Fabritiis,et al. KDEEP: Protein-Ligand Absolute Binding Affinity Prediction via 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks , 2018, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[316] Thomas Blaschke,et al. Molecular de-novo design through deep reinforcement learning , 2017, Journal of Cheminformatics.
[317] Jun Xu,et al. Predicting Retrosynthetic Reactions Using Self-Corrected Transformer Neural Networks , 2019, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[318] D. Swanson. Migraine and Magnesium: Eleven Neglected Connections , 2015, Perspectives in biology and medicine.
[319] Ruslan Salakhutdinov,et al. Learning Deep Generative Models , 2009 .
[320] C. M. Reeves,et al. Function minimization by conjugate gradients , 1964, Comput. J..
[321] L Mark Hall,et al. Evaluation of an Artificial Neural Network Retention Index Model for Chemical Structure Identification in Nontargeted Metabolomics. , 2018, Analytical chemistry.
[322] Randall Q. Snurr,et al. Identifying promising metal–organic frameworks for heterogeneous catalysis via high‐throughput periodic density functional theory , 2019, J. Comput. Chem..
[323] Taylor D. Sparks,et al. High-Throughput Machine-Learning-Driven Synthesis of Full-Heusler Compounds , 2016 .
[324] Ji-Bo Wang,et al. The Proximal Lilly Collection: Mapping, Exploring and Exploiting Feasible Chemical Space , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[325] P. Clemons,et al. Target identification and mechanism of action in chemical biology and drug discovery. , 2013, Nature chemical biology.
[326] Jun S. Liu,et al. Integrated Bio-Entity Network: A System for Biological Knowledge Discovery , 2011, PloS one.
[327] Ramón García-Domenech,et al. Application of molecular topology for the prediction of the reaction times and yields under solvent-free conditions , 2010 .
[328] Piotr Dittwald,et al. Computergestützte Syntheseplanung: Das Ende vom Anfang , 2016 .
[329] Amedeo Caflisch,et al. Fragment-Based de Novo Ligand Design by Multiobjective Evolutionary Optimization , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[330] Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al. Inverse molecular design using machine learning: Generative models for matter engineering , 2018, Science.
[331] W Frank An,et al. Cell-Based Assays for High-Throughput Screening , 2010, Molecular biotechnology.
[332] J. Gregoire,et al. Machine Learning of Optical Properties of Materials - Predicting Spectra from Images and Images from Spectra , 2018 .
[333] Klaus-Robert Müller,et al. Finding Density Functionals with Machine Learning , 2011, Physical review letters.
[334] David R. Liu,et al. Methods for the directed evolution of proteins , 2015, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[335] Jeffrey Y. Pan,et al. Engineering Chemistry Innovation. , 2019, ACS medicinal chemistry letters.
[336] W. L. Jorgensen,et al. Computer-assisted mechanistic evaluation of organic reactions. 1. Overview , 1980 .
[337] Kimito Funatsu,et al. SOPHIA, a Knowledge Base-Guided Reaction Prediction System - Utilization of a Knowledge Base Derived from a Reaction Database , 1995, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[338] Stephani Joy Y Macalino,et al. Role of computer-aided drug design in modern drug discovery , 2015, Archives of Pharmacal Research.
[339] J. Hendler,et al. Amplify scientific discovery with artificial intelligence , 2014, Science.
[340] Santosh Putta,et al. Machine-learning models for combinatorial catalyst discovery , 2003 .
[341] Frank R Burden,et al. Quantitative structure-property relationship modeling of diverse materials properties. , 2012, Chemical reviews.
[342] Dara Khairunnisa Binte Mohamed,et al. Reaction screening in continuous flow reactors , 2016 .
[343] John R. Proudfoot,et al. Molecular Complexity and Retrosynthesis. , 2017, The Journal of organic chemistry.
[344] Wendy A Warr,et al. A Short Review of Chemical Reaction Database Systems, Computer‐Aided Synthesis Design, Reaction Prediction and Synthetic Feasibility , 2014, Molecular informatics.
[345] Robert P. Sheridan,et al. Modeling a Crowdsourced Definition of Molecular Complexity , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[346] Ove Christiansen,et al. Machine learning for potential energy surfaces: An extensive database and assessment of methods. , 2019, The Journal of chemical physics.
[347] Christopher H. Bryant,et al. Functional genomic hypothesis generation and experimentation by a robot scientist , 2004, Nature.
[348] Ross D. King,et al. Automating Sciences: Philosophical and Social Dimensions , 2018, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.
[349] Irwin D. Kuntz,et al. A genetic algorithm for structure-based de novo design , 2001, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[350] Gunnar Rätsch,et al. Active Learning with Support Vector Machines in the Drug Discovery Process , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[351] Fabian J Theis,et al. Deep learning: new computational modelling techniques for genomics , 2019, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[352] Atsuto Seko,et al. Prediction of Low-Thermal-Conductivity Compounds with First-Principles Anharmonic Lattice-Dynamics Calculations and Bayesian Optimization. , 2015, Physical review letters.
[353] Markus Reiher,et al. The Exploration of Chemical Reaction Networks. , 2019, Annual review of physical chemistry.
[354] R. Kondor,et al. Gaussian approximation potentials: the accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons. , 2009, Physical review letters.
[355] Anubhav Jain,et al. Finding Nature’s Missing Ternary Oxide Compounds Using Machine Learning and Density Functional Theory , 2010 .
[356] Alexandre Varnek,et al. Structure–reactivity modeling using mixture-based representation of chemical reactions , 2017, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.
[357] Noel M. O'Boyle,et al. Computational Design and Selection of Optimal Organic Photovoltaic Materials , 2011 .
[358] Alexei Lapkin,et al. Self-optimisation and model-based design of experiments for developing a C–H activation flow process , 2017, Beilstein journal of organic chemistry.
[359] Igor I. Baskin,et al. Structure–reactivity relationship in Diels–Alder reactions obtained using the condensed reaction graph approach , 2017, Journal of Structural Chemistry.
[360] Robert F Murphy,et al. An active role for machine learning in drug development. , 2011, Nature chemical biology.
[361] Jeffrey Dean,et al. Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space , 2013, ICLR.
[362] Alok Choudhary,et al. Combinatorial screening for new materials in unconstrained composition space with machine learning , 2014 .
[363] Steven V. Ley,et al. Organische Synthese: Vormarsch der Maschinen , 2015 .
[364] Klavs F Jensen,et al. Reconfigurable system for automated optimization of diverse chemical reactions , 2018, Science.
[365] Florent Chevillard,et al. Virtual Compound Libraries in Computer-Assisted Drug Discovery , 2019, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[366] Mar Michael Meier,et al. Combinatorial polymer research and high-throughput experimentation: powerful tools for the discovery and evaluation of new materials , 2004 .
[367] Leroy Cronin,et al. An autonomous organic reaction search engine for chemical reactivity , 2017, Nature Communications.
[368] Ryan L Hartman,et al. Microchemical systems for continuous-flow synthesis. , 2009, Lab on a chip.
[369] William H. Green,et al. Predictive Kinetics: A New Approach for the 21st Century , 2010 .
[370] Gisbert Schneider,et al. Automating drug discovery , 2017, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[371] J Willem M Nissink,et al. Seven Year Itch: Pan-Assay Interference Compounds (PAINS) in 2017—Utility and Limitations , 2017, ACS chemical biology.
[372] Mike Preuss,et al. Planning chemical syntheses with deep neural networks and symbolic AI , 2017, Nature.
[373] John F. Hartwig,et al. A Fluorescence-Based Assay for High-Throughput Screening of Coupling Reactions. Application to Heck Chemistry , 1999 .
[374] H. M. Vinkers,et al. SYNOPSIS: SYNthesize and OPtimize System in Silico. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[375] M. Terrones,et al. Discovery of wall-selective carbon nanotube growth conditions via automated experimentation. , 2014, ACS nano.
[376] Jonathan A. Ellman,et al. Synthesis and Applications of Small Molecule Libraries. , 1996, Chemical reviews.
[377] Igor V. Tetko,et al. ToxAlerts: A Web Server of Structural Alerts for Toxic Chemicals and Compounds with Potential Adverse Reactions , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[378] Leroy Cronin,et al. Towards dial-a-molecule by integrating continuous flow, analytics and self-optimisation. , 2016, Chemical Society reviews.
[379] Per-Ola Norrby,et al. Steric Influences on the Selectivity in Palladium-Catalyzed Allylation , 1997 .
[380] Andrew P. Bradley,et al. Rule extraction from support vector machines: A review , 2010, Neurocomputing.
[381] P. Manju,et al. Fast machine-learning online optimization of ultra-cold-atom experiments , 2015, Scientific Reports.
[382] Evgeny Putin,et al. Adversarial Threshold Neural Computer for Molecular de Novo Design. , 2018, Molecular pharmaceutics.
[383] Timon Schroeter,et al. Visual Interpretation of Kernel‐Based Prediction Models , 2011, Molecular informatics.
[384] Paul Raccuglia,et al. Machine-learning-assisted materials discovery using failed experiments , 2016, Nature.
[385] Stefano Curtarolo,et al. Uncovering compounds by synergy of cluster expansion and high-throughput methods. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[386] Bin Yang,et al. Modeling study of the anti-knock tendency of substituted phenols as additives: an application of the reaction mechanism generator (RMG). , 2018, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.
[387] Jörg Rech,et al. Knowledge Discovery in Databases , 2001, Künstliche Intell..
[388] Peter Ertl,et al. Estimation of synthetic accessibility score of drug-like molecules based on molecular complexity and fragment contributions , 2009, J. Cheminformatics.
[389] Karin M. Verspoor,et al. Improving Chemical Named Entity Recognition in Patents with Contextualized Word Embeddings , 2019, BioNLP@ACL.
[390] Piotr Dittwald,et al. Computer-Assisted Synthetic Planning: The End of the Beginning. , 2016, Angewandte Chemie.
[391] Michael G. Hutchings,et al. Route Design in the 21st Century: The ICSYNTH Software Tool as an Idea Generator for Synthesis Prediction , 2015 .
[392] D. W. Noid,et al. On the Design, Analysis, and Characterization of Materials Using Computational Neural Networks , 1996 .
[393] M. Bezerra,et al. Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. , 2008, Talanta.
[394] V. Batista,et al. Search for Catalysts by Inverse Design: Artificial Intelligence, Mountain Climbers, and Alchemists. , 2019, Chemical reviews.
[395] Polina Golland,et al. Scoring diverse cellular morphologies in image-based screens with iterative feedback and machine learning , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[396] Satoshi Maeda,et al. On Benchmarking of Automated Methods for Performing Exhaustive Reaction Path Search. , 2019, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[397] C. Dobson. Chemical space and biology , 2004, Nature.
[398] W. P. Walters,et al. Virtual Chemical Libraries. , 2018, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[399] Matthew P. Repasky,et al. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[400] Thomas Blaschke,et al. The rise of deep learning in drug discovery. , 2018, Drug discovery today.
[401] Jiali Li,et al. Deep Learning Accelerated Gold Nanocluster Synthesis , 2018, Adv. Intell. Syst..
[402] Zachary W. Ulissi,et al. Automated Discovery and Construction of Surface Phase Diagrams Using Machine Learning. , 2016, The journal of physical chemistry letters.
[403] Aleksey Buzmakov,et al. Discovering Structural Alerts for Mutagenicity Using Stable Emerging Molecular Patterns , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[404] David Klahr,et al. Dual Space Search During Scientific Reasoning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..
[405] Rahul Rao,et al. Autonomy in materials research: a case study in carbon nanotube growth , 2016 .
[406] Pavel Polishchuk,et al. Interpretation of Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Models: Past, Present, and Future , 2017, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[407] M. Rubens,et al. Precise Polymer Synthesis by Autonomous Self-Optimizing Flow Reactors. , 2019, Angewandte Chemie.
[408] John Bradshaw,et al. Predicting Electron Paths , 2018, ArXiv.
[409] Gerbrand Ceder,et al. Predicting crystal structure by merging data mining with quantum mechanics , 2006, Nature materials.
[410] Olexandr Isayev,et al. Deep reinforcement learning for de novo drug design , 2017, Science Advances.
[411] Peter Willett,et al. Designing focused libraries using MoSELECT. , 2002, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[412] W. Goddard,et al. UFF, a full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations , 1992 .
[413] Pierre Baldi,et al. Learning to Predict Chemical Reactions , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[414] Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al. What Is High-Throughput Virtual Screening? A Perspective from Organic Materials Discovery , 2015 .
[415] Andreas Schwienhorst,et al. Genetic algorithm for the design of molecules with desired properties , 2002, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[416] J. Bajorath,et al. State-of-the-art in ligand-based virtual screening. , 2011, Drug discovery today.
[417] Hongfeng Deng,et al. Discovery of highly potent and selective small molecule ADAMTS-5 inhibitors that inhibit human cartilage degradation via encoded library technology (ELT). , 2012, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[418] William H. Green,et al. Computer-Assisted Retrosynthesis Based on Molecular Similarity , 2017, ACS central science.
[419] Nathan Brown,et al. Multi-objective optimization methods in drug design. , 2013, Drug discovery today. Technologies.
[420] Connor W. Coley,et al. A graph-convolutional neural network model for the prediction of chemical reactivity , 2018, Chemical science.
[421] Pedro J. Ballester,et al. Performance of machine-learning scoring functions in structure-based virtual screening , 2017, Scientific Reports.
[422] Alexander V. Shapeev,et al. Active learning of linearly parametrized interatomic potentials , 2016, 1611.09346.
[423] S. Free,et al. A MATHEMATICAL CONTRIBUTION TO STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY STUDIES. , 1964, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[424] E Weinan,et al. Deep Potential Molecular Dynamics: a scalable model with the accuracy of quantum mechanics , 2017, Physical review letters.
[425] Christoph E. Dumelin,et al. Encoded Library Synthesis Using Chemical Ligation and the Discovery of sEH Inhibitors from a 334-Million Member Library , 2015, Scientific Reports.
[426] Ribana Roscher,et al. Explainable Machine Learning for Scientific Insights and Discoveries , 2019, IEEE Access.
[427] Raúl E. Valdés-Pérez,et al. Human/computer interactive elucidation of reaction mechanisms: application to catalyzed hydrogenolysis of ethane , 1994 .
[428] Brandon J. Reizman,et al. An Automated Continuous-Flow Platform for the Estimation of Multistep Reaction Kinetics , 2012 .
[429] A A Lapkin,et al. Automation of route identification and optimisation based on data-mining and chemical intuition. , 2017, Faraday discussions.
[430] Bruce G. Buchanan,et al. On generality and problem solving: a case study using the DENDRAL program , 1970 .
[431] Ian Hughes,et al. Automated Lead Optimization of MMP-12 Inhibitors Using a Genetic Algorithm. , 2011, ACS medicinal chemistry letters.
[432] P Schneider,et al. Multi-objective active machine learning rapidly improves structure–activity models and reveals new protein–protein interaction inhibitors† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Details about computational comparisons and all screening results. See DOI: 10.1039/c5sc04272k , 2016, Chemical science.
[433] Vasant Honavar,et al. The Promise and Potential of Big Data: A Case for Discovery Informatics , 2014 .
[434] Krishna Rajan,et al. Materials Informatics: The Materials ``Gene'' and Big Data , 2015 .
[435] Qionghua Zhou,et al. Rapid Discovery of Ferroelectric Photovoltaic Perovskites and Material Descriptors via Machine Learning , 2019, Small Methods.
[436] Jan M. Zytkow,et al. Data-Driven Approaches to Empirical Discovery , 1989, Artif. Intell..
[437] Alexandre Tkatchenko,et al. Quantum-chemical insights from deep tensor neural networks , 2016, Nature Communications.
[438] D. Horvath,et al. Integrated Strategy for Lead Optimization Based on Fragment Growing: The Diversity-Oriented-Target-Focused-Synthesis Approach. , 2018, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[439] Jonathan Grizou,et al. Human versus Robots in the Discovery and Crystallization of Gigantic Polyoxometalates , 2017, Angewandte Chemie.
[440] J. Behler. First Principles Neural Network Potentials for Reactive Simulations of Large Molecular and Condensed Systems. , 2017, Angewandte Chemie.
[441] H. M. Geysen,et al. Isotope or mass encoding of combinatorial libraries. , 1996, Chemistry & biology.
[442] Mark Moll,et al. A review of parameters and heuristics for guiding metabolic pathfinding , 2017, Journal of Cheminformatics.
[443] Bo Yu,et al. Size estimation of chemical space: how big is it? , 2012, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.
[444] Leroy Cronin,et al. Organic synthesis in a modular robotic system driven by a chemical programming language , 2019, Science.
[445] Michael W. George,et al. Automated Serendipity with Self-Optimizing Continuous-Flow Reactors , 2015 .
[446] Thierry Kogej,et al. Generating Focused Molecule Libraries for Drug Discovery with Recurrent Neural Networks , 2017, ACS central science.
[447] F. Dean Toste,et al. A data-intensive approach to mechanistic elucidation applied to chiral anion catalysis , 2015, Science.
[448] J. Nørskov,et al. Towards the computational design of solid catalysts. , 2009, Nature chemistry.
[449] Louis-Charles Campeau,et al. Nickel-Catalyzed Asymmetric Alkene Hydrogenation of α,β-Unsaturated Esters: High-Throughput Experimentation-Enabled Reaction Discovery, Optimization, and Mechanistic Elucidation. , 2016, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[450] Bowen Li,et al. Designing compact training sets for data-driven molecular property prediction through optimal exploitation and exploration , 2019, Molecular Systems Design & Engineering.
[451] W. Patrick Walters,et al. A guide to drug discovery: Designing screens: how to make your hits a hit , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[452] Brian L. DeCost,et al. Accelerated Development of Perovskite-Inspired Materials via High-Throughput Synthesis and Machine-Learning Diagnosis , 2018, Joule.
[453] Aleksandra Baranczak,et al. Integrated Platform for Expedited Synthesis-Purification-Testing of Small Molecule Libraries. , 2017, ACS medicinal chemistry letters.
[454] Jan M. Zytkow,et al. Combining many searches in the FAHRENHEIT discovery system , 1987 .
[455] Bruce G Buchanan,et al. Automating Science , 2009, Science.
[456] Richard Hansen,et al. National Instruments LabVIEW: A Programming Environment for Laboratory Automation and Measurement , 2007 .
[457] Bin Li,et al. Applications of machine learning in drug discovery and development , 2019, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[458] Linda J. Broadbelt,et al. Computer Generated Pyrolysis Modeling: On-the-Fly Generation of Species, Reactions, and Rates , 1994 .
[459] Claudio Battilocchio,et al. A Novel Internet-Based Reaction Monitoring, Control and Autonomous Self-Optimization Platform for Chemical Synthesis , 2015 .
[460] Oliver Throl,et al. High-throughput screening: speeding up porous materials discovery. , 2011, Chemical communications.
[461] Jean-Marie Lehn,et al. Dynamic Combinatorial Chemistry and Virtual Combinatorial Libraries , 1999 .
[462] J. Panteleev,et al. Recent applications of machine learning in medicinal chemistry. , 2018, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.
[463] Anthony Wood,et al. Organic synthesis provides opportunities to transform drug discovery , 2018, Nature Chemistry.
[464] Connie M. Borror,et al. Response surface design evaluation and comparison , 2009 .
[465] Markus Reiher,et al. Exploration of Reaction Pathways and Chemical Transformation Networks. , 2018, The journal of physical chemistry. A.
[466] P. Anderson,et al. Machines fall short of revolutionary science. , 2009, Science.
[467] Feng Lin,et al. Machine Learning Directed Search for Ultraincompressible, Superhard Materials. , 2018, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[469] Arnold Neumaier,et al. SNOBFIT -- Stable Noisy Optimization by Branch and Fit , 2008, TOMS.
[470] E J Corey,et al. Computer-assisted design of complex organic syntheses. , 1969, Science.
[471] Isik Onal,et al. Hochdurchsatz-Screening von Heterogenkatalysator-Bibliotheken unter Verwendung eines Mehrkammerreaktorsystems und der Massenspektrometrie , 1999 .
[472] Turab Lookman,et al. Active learning in materials science with emphasis on adaptive sampling using uncertainties for targeted design , 2019, npj Computational Materials.
[473] Robert P. Sheridan,et al. Mapping the dark space of chemical reactions with extended nanomole synthesis and MALDI-TOF MS , 2018, Science.
[474] R. King,et al. Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity bioassays from molecular structure using inductive logic programming. , 1996, Environmental health perspectives.
[475] D. Sanderson,et al. Computer Prediction of Possible Toxic Action from Chemical Structure; The DEREK System , 1991, Human & experimental toxicology.
[476] Arun Mannodi-Kanakkithodi,et al. Machine Learning Strategy for Accelerated Design of Polymer Dielectrics , 2016, Scientific Reports.
[477] K. Popper,et al. Conjectures and refutations;: The growth of scientific knowledge , 1972 .
[478] Hans-Michael Müller,et al. Textpresso: An Ontology-Based Information Retrieval and Extraction System for Biological Literature , 2004, PLoS biology.
[479] Jonathan P. McMullen,et al. An Automated Microfluidic System for Online Optimization in Chemical Synthesis , 2010 .
[480] P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .
[481] Raúl E. Valdés-Pérez,et al. Machine Discovery in Chemistry: New Results , 1995, Artif. Intell..
[482] Stuart L. Schreiber,et al. High-Throughput Luciferase-Based Assay for the Discovery of Therapeutics That Prevent Malaria , 2016, ACS infectious diseases.
[483] Masha Elkin,et al. Computational chemistry strategies in natural product synthesis. , 2018, Chemical Society reviews.
[484] Derek S. Tan,et al. Diversity-oriented synthesis: exploring the intersections between chemistry and biology , 2005, Nature chemical biology.
[485] David R Spring,et al. Diversity-oriented synthesis as a tool for the discovery of novel biologically active small molecules. , 2010, Nature communications.
[486] R. McGibbon,et al. Discovering chemistry with an ab initio nanoreactor , 2014, Nature chemistry.
[487] R. B. Sunoj,et al. Machine learning for predicting product distributions in catalytic regioselective reactions. , 2018, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.
[488] John B. O. Mitchell. Machine learning methods in chemoinformatics , 2014, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational molecular science.
[489] Martyn Poliakoff,et al. Self-optimizing continuous reactions in supercritical carbon dioxide. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.
[490] Samu Melkko,et al. DNA-encoded chemical libraries , 2022, Nature Reviews Methods Primers.
[491] A. Valencia,et al. Linking genes to literature: text mining, information extraction, and retrieval applications for biology , 2008, Genome Biology.
[492] Jolene P Reid,et al. Holistic Prediction of Enantioselectivity in Asymmetric Catalysis , 2019, Nature.
[493] Venkat Venkatasubramanian,et al. Catalyst design: knowledge extraction from high-throughput experimentation , 2003 .
[494] Qi Wang,et al. Discovery of neuroprotective compounds by machine learning approaches , 2016 .
[495] Mohammed AlQuraishi. End-to-end differentiable learning of protein structure , 2018, bioRxiv.
[496] Kristin A. Persson,et al. Predicting crystal structures with data mining of quantum calculations. , 2003, Physical review letters.
[497] Floris P. J. T. Rutjes,et al. Fast Scale-Up Using Microreactors: Pyrrole Synthesis from Micro to Production Scale , 2011 .
[498] Eric S. Isbrandt,et al. Hochdurchsatzstrategien zur Entdeckung und Optimierung katalytischer Reaktionen , 2019, Angewandte Chemie.
[499] Zois Boukouvalas,et al. Deep learning for molecular generation and optimization - a review of the state of the art , 2019, Molecular Systems Design & Engineering.
[500] Robert T. McGibbon,et al. Automated Discovery and Refinement of Reactive Molecular Dynamics Pathways. , 2016, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[501] Young-Chul Bae,et al. Advanced Intelligent Systems , 2014, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing.
[502] C. E. Peishoff,et al. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[503] Ashwin Srinivasan,et al. Pharmacophore Discovery Using the Inductive Logic Programming System PROGOL , 1998, Machine Learning.
[504] Krishna Rajan,et al. Combinatorial and high-throughput screening of materials libraries: review of state of the art. , 2011, ACS combinatorial science.
[505] Jonas Boström,et al. Expanding the medicinal chemistry synthetic toolbox , 2018, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[506] H. K. D. H. Bhadeshia,et al. Performance of neural networks in materials science , 2009 .
[507] Klavs F Jensen,et al. Feedback in Flow for Accelerated Reaction Development. , 2016, Accounts of chemical research.
[508] Neil R. Smalheiser,et al. Artificial Intelligence An interactive system for finding complementary literatures : a stimulus to scientific discovery , 1995 .
[509] Petra Schneider,et al. Generative Recurrent Networks for De Novo Drug Design , 2017, Molecular informatics.
[510] Jason E. Kreutz,et al. Evolution of catalysts directed by genetic algorithms in a plug-based microfluidic device tested with oxidation of methane by oxygen. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[511] Garry P Nolan,et al. Fluorescent cell barcoding in flow cytometry allows high-throughput drug screening and signaling profiling , 2006, Nature Methods.
[512] I. Takeuchi,et al. Role of high-throughput characterization tools in combinatorial materials science , 2004 .
[513] J. An,et al. Structure-based virtual screening of chemical libraries for drug discovery. , 2006, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[514] Scott Boyer,et al. Choosing Feature Selection and Learning Algorithms in QSAR , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[515] Maciej Haranczyk,et al. Capturing chemical intuition in synthesis of metal-organic frameworks , 2019, Nature Communications.
[516] Pat Langley. The computational support of scientific discovery , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[517] Frank Noé,et al. Machine Learning of Coarse-Grained Molecular Dynamics Force Fields , 2018, ACS central science.
[518] Maria F. Sassano,et al. Automated design of ligands to polypharmacological profiles , 2012, Nature.
[519] Anthony F. Volpe,et al. Gas phase oxidation of ethane to acetic acid using high-throughput screening in a massively parallel microfluidic reactor system , 2003 .
[520] Geun Ho Gu,et al. Machine learning for renewable energy materials , 2019, Journal of Materials Chemistry A.
[521] Shikha Gupta,et al. Predicting Toxicities of Diverse Chemical Pesticides in Multiple Avian Species Using Tree-Based QSAR Approaches for Regulatory Purposes , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[522] K. Roberts,et al. Thesis , 2002 .
[523] Robert F. Murphy,et al. Efficient discovery of responses of proteins to compounds using active learning , 2013, BMC Bioinformatics.
[524] H. Simon,et al. Scientific discovery as problem solving , 1981, Synthese.
[525] A. Valencia,et al. Information Retrieval and Text Mining Technologies for Chemistry. , 2017, Chemical reviews.
[526] Lawrence Hunter,et al. Biomedical Discovery Acceleration, with Applications to Craniofacial Development , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[527] Woo Youn Kim,et al. Efficient prediction of reaction paths through molecular graph and reaction network analysis† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Detailed information on reaction networks and pathways for two example reactions, Cartesian coordinates of molecules in the reaction networks obtained , 2017, Chemical science.
[528] Sudhir B. Kylasa,et al. The ReaxFF reactive force-field: development, applications and future directions , 2016 .
[529] Steven H. Bertz,et al. The first general index of molecular complexity , 1981 .
[530] Jared T. Shaw,et al. Recent advances in multicomponent reactions for diversity-oriented synthesis. , 2010, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[531] Adam Nelson,et al. Streamlining bioactive molecular discovery through integration and automation , 2018, Nature Reviews Chemistry.
[532] S. L. Mayo,et al. DREIDING: A generic force field for molecular simulations , 1990 .
[533] Elsa Olivetti,et al. A Machine Learning Approach to Zeolite Synthesis Enabled by Automatic Literature Data Extraction , 2019, ACS central science.
[534] W. Guida,et al. The art and practice of structure‐based drug design: A molecular modeling perspective , 1996, Medicinal research reviews.
[535] J. Tuszynski,et al. Software for molecular docking: a review , 2017, Biophysical Reviews.
[536] Paul M. Zimmerman,et al. Automated discovery of chemically reasonable elementary reaction steps , 2013, J. Comput. Chem..
[537] Alexandre Varnek,et al. Structural and Physico-Chemical Interpretation (SPCI) of QSAR Models and Its Comparison with Matched Molecular Pair Analysis , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[538] Regina Barzilay,et al. Convolutional Embedding of Attributed Molecular Graphs for Physical Property Prediction , 2017, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[539] Alexei A. Lapkin,et al. An Introduction to Closed-Loop Process Optimization and Online Analysis , 2019, Handbook of Green Chemistry.
[540] Zachary W. Ulissi,et al. To address surface reaction network complexity using scaling relations machine learning and DFT calculations , 2017, Nature Communications.
[541] Russ B Altman,et al. Machine learning in chemoinformatics and drug discovery. , 2018, Drug discovery today.
[542] R. M. Muir,et al. Correlation of Biological Activity of Phenoxyacetic Acids with Hammett Substituent Constants and Partition Coefficients , 1962, Nature.
[543] Herbert A. Simon,et al. Scientific discovery: compulalional explorations of the creative process , 1987 .
[544] Charlotte Truchet,et al. An Autonomous Self-Optimizing Flow Reactor for the Synthesis of Natural Product Carpanone. , 2018, The Journal of organic chemistry.
[545] Alfonso Valencia,et al. CHEMDNER: The drugs and chemical names extraction challenge , 2015, Journal of Cheminformatics.
[546] Edward W. Lowe,et al. Computational Methods in Drug Discovery , 2014, Pharmacological Reviews.
[547] Michael Almstetter,et al. Discovery of New Multi Component Reactions with Combinatorial Methods , 1999 .
[548] Brian L Claus,et al. Discovery informatics: its evolving role in drug discovery. , 2002, Drug discovery today.
[549] Leroy Cronin,et al. Controlling an organic synthesis robot with machine learning to search for new reactivity , 2018, Nature.
[550] Jacqueline M. Cole,et al. ChemDataExtractor: A Toolkit for Automated Extraction of Chemical Information from the Scientific Literature , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[551] Ioannis G. Kevrekidis,et al. Data Mining for Parameters Affecting Polymorph Selection in Contorted Hexabenzocoronene Derivatives. , 2018, Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society.
[552] Jan H Jensen. A graph-based genetic algorithm and generative model/Monte Carlo tree search for the exploration of chemical space† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: The codes used in this study can be found on GitHub: github.com/jensengroup/GB-GA/tree/v0.0 and github.com/jensengroup/GB-GM/tree , 2019, Chemical science.
[553] Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al. Reinforced Adversarial Neural Computer for de Novo Molecular Design , 2018, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[554] Anubhav Jain,et al. Python Materials Genomics (pymatgen): A robust, open-source python library for materials analysis , 2012 .
[555] Edward A. Feigenbaum,et al. Computers & thought , 1995 .
[556] Chartchalerm Isarankura-Na-Ayudhya,et al. Prediction of GFP spectral properties using artificial neural network , 2007, J. Comput. Chem..
[557] Pedro J Ballester,et al. Prospective virtual screening with Ultrafast Shape Recognition: the identification of novel inhibitors of arylamine N-acetyltransferases , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.
[558] J. Farris. CONJECTURES AND REFUTATIONS , 1995, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[559] Manfred T Reetz,et al. A Method for High-Throughput Screening of Enantioselective Catalysts. , 1999, Angewandte Chemie.
[560] Dominique Douguet,et al. A genetic algorithm for the automated generation of small organic molecules: Drug design using an evolutionary algorithm , 2000, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[561] Samy Bengio,et al. Generating Sentences from a Continuous Space , 2015, CoNLL.
[562] Emma Strubell,et al. Machine-learned and codified synthesis parameters of oxide materials , 2017, Scientific Data.
[563] Robert P. Sheridan,et al. Using a Genetic Algorithm To Suggest Combinatorial Libraries , 1995, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[564] Olga Kononova,et al. Unsupervised word embeddings capture latent knowledge from materials science literature , 2019, Nature.
[565] Rafael Gómez-Bombarelli,et al. Generative Models for Automatic Chemical Design , 2019, Machine Learning Meets Quantum Physics.
[566] Ryan P. Adams,et al. Rapid Prediction of Electron–Ionization Mass Spectrometry Using Neural Networks , 2018, ACS central science.
[567] Johann Gasteiger,et al. New Applications of Computers in Chemistry , 1979 .
[568] Yun Ding,et al. Discovery of Potent and Selective Inhibitors for ADAMTS-4 through DNA-Encoded Library Technology (ELT). , 2015, ACS medicinal chemistry letters.
[569] Gisbert Schneider,et al. SVM-Based Feature Selection for Characterization of Focused Compound Collections , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[570] Lutz Weber,et al. Optimierung der biologischen Aktivität von kombinatorischen Verbindungsbibliotheken durch einen genetischen Algorithmus , 1995 .
[571] Tetsuya Taketsugu,et al. Exploring transition state structures for intramolecular pathways by the artificial force induced reaction method , 2014, J. Comput. Chem..
[572] Juno Nam,et al. Linking the Neural Machine Translation and the Prediction of Organic Chemistry Reactions , 2016, ArXiv.
[573] Prodromos Daoutidis,et al. Rule-Based Generation of Thermochemical Routes to Biomass Conversion , 2010 .
[574] Leo Breiman,et al. Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures (with comments and a rejoinder by the author) , 2001 .
[575] Fang Liu,et al. Learning from Failure: Predicting Electronic Structure Calculation Outcomes with Machine Learning Models. , 2019, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[576] Marwin H. S. Segler,et al. Neural-Symbolic Machine Learning for Retrosynthesis and Reaction Prediction. , 2017, Chemistry.
[577] Xin Yan,et al. DeepChemStable: Chemical Stability Prediction with an Attention-Based Graph Convolution Network , 2019, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[578] Joao Aires de Sousa,et al. Structure–Spectrum Correlations and Computer‐Assisted Structure Elucidation , 2018 .
[579] Florent Chevillard,et al. SCUBIDOO: A Large yet Screenable and Easily Searchable Database of Computationally Created Chemical Compounds Optimized toward High Likelihood of Synthetic Tractability , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[580] H. Schlegel,et al. Optimization of equilibrium geometries and transition structures , 1982 .
[581] Matthias Rupp,et al. Machine learning for quantum mechanics in a nutshell , 2015 .
[582] Andrey Kazennov,et al. The cornucopia of meaningful leads: Applying deep adversarial autoencoders for new molecule development in oncology , 2016, Oncotarget.
[583] William H. Green,et al. Reaction Mechanism Generator: Automatic construction of chemical kinetic mechanisms , 2016, Comput. Phys. Commun..
[584] C. Fjell,et al. Identification of novel antibacterial peptides by chemoinformatics and machine learning. , 2009, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[585] Fernand Gobet,et al. Computational Scientific Discovery , 2017 .
[586] Rajni Verma,et al. Computer-Aided Protein Directed Evolution: a Review of Web Servers, Databases and other Computational Tools for Protein Engineering , 2012, Computational and structural biotechnology journal.
[587] A. Valencia,et al. Text-mining and information-retrieval services for molecular biology , 2005, Genome Biology.
[588] Stefan H. Unger,et al. Quantitative Models of Steric Effects , 1977 .
[589] Stefan Zimmermann,et al. Gerüstdiversitätsbasierte Synthese und ihre Anwendung bei der Sonden‐ und Wirkstoffsuche , 2016 .
[590] John B. O. Mitchell,et al. A machine learning approach to predicting protein-ligand binding affinity with applications to molecular docking , 2010, Bioinform..
[591] David Baker,et al. Macromolecular modeling with rosetta. , 2008, Annual review of biochemistry.
[592] Ian H. Witten,et al. Using Concept Learning for Knowledge Acquisition , 1988, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..
[593] Gisbert Schneider,et al. Automated De Novo Drug Design: Are We Nearly There Yet? , 2019, Angewandte Chemie.
[594] Jörg Behler,et al. Hochdimensionale neuronale Netze für Potentialhyperflächen großer molekularer und kondensierter Systeme , 2017 .
[595] Robert G. Parr,et al. Variational Principles for Describing Chemical Reactions: The Fukui Function and Chemical Hardness Revisited , 2000 .
[596] Bruce Ganem,et al. Strategies for innovation in multicomponent reaction design. , 2009, Accounts of chemical research.