STATISTICAL ANALYSIS WHEN THE DATA IS AN IMAGE: ELICITING STUDENT THINKING ABOUT SAMPLING AND VARIABILITY

Results of analysis of responses to a first-year undergraduate engineering activity are presented. Teams of students were asked to develop a procedure for quantifying the roughness of a surface at the nanoscale, which is typical of problems in Materials Engineering where qualities of a material need to be quantified. Thirty-five teams were selected from a large engineering course for analysis of their responses. The results indicate that engagement in the task naturally led teams to design a sampling plan, use or design measures of center and variability, and integrate those measures into a model to solve the stated problem. Team responses revealed misunderstandings that students have about measures of center and variability. Implications for instruction and future research are discussed. First published May 2011 at Statistics Education Research Journal: Archives

[1]  Jane Watson,et al.  Development of the concept of statistical variation: An exploratory study , 2000 .

[2]  Richard Lesh,et al.  Origins and Evolution of Model-Based Reasoning in Mathematics and Science , 2003 .

[3]  Jane Watson,et al.  Cognition and Instruction: Reasoning about bias in sampling , 2005 .

[4]  Ronald D. Snee,et al.  Statistical Thinking and Its Contribution to Total Quality , 1990 .

[5]  Ronald D. Snee,et al.  Statistical Thinking: Improving Business Performance , 2001 .

[6]  Stephen W. Hawking,et al.  On The Shoulders Of Giants , 2016 .

[7]  Jane Watson,et al.  School Mathematics Students' Acknowledgement of Statistical Variation , 1999 .

[8]  Cliff Konold,et al.  Reconnecting Data and Chance , 2008 .

[9]  Judith S. Zawojewski,et al.  Models and Modeling in Engineering Education: Designing Experiences for All Students , 2008 .

[10]  S. D. Lima,et al.  Concept or computation: Students' understanding of the mean , 1981 .

[11]  Scott Allen Chamberlin Analysis of interest during and after model eliciting activities: A comparison of gifted and general population students , 2002 .

[12]  Randall E. Groth An investigation of statistical thinking in two different contexts: Detecting a signal in a noisy process and determining a typical value , 2005 .

[13]  Greater Emphasis on Variation in an Introductory Statistics Course , 1997 .

[14]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Inventing to Prepare for Future Learning: The Hidden Efficiency of Encouraging Original Student Production in Statistics Instruction , 2004 .

[15]  D. Vere-Jones,et al.  Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Teaching Statistics , 1989 .

[16]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Dynamic transfer and innovation , 2008 .

[17]  Margret Hjalmarson Engineering students designing a statistical procedure for quantifying variability , 2007 .

[18]  H. Diefes-Dux,et al.  Developing model-eliciting activities for undergraduate students based on advanced engineering content , 2004, 34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004..

[19]  Don Russell,et al.  On the shoulders of giants , 2009 .

[20]  Carmona Dominguez,et al.  Designing an assessment tool to describe students' mathematical knowledge , 2004 .

[21]  Richard Lesh,et al.  A Modeling Perspective on Learning and Teaching in Engineering Education , 2008 .

[22]  Portia C. Elliott,et al.  Thinking and Reasoning with Data and Chance , 2003 .

[23]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Data Analysis as the Search for Signals in Noisy Processes. , 2002 .

[24]  Helen M. Doerr,et al.  A modeling perspective on student's mathematical reasoning about data , 2003 .

[25]  Christine M. Anderson-Cook The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning and Thinking , 2006 .

[26]  Tamara J. Moore Student team functioning and the effect on mathematical problem solving in a first-year engineering course , 2006 .

[27]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Understanding the effects of sample size on the variability of the mean , 1990 .

[28]  C. KONOLD,et al.  STUDENTS ANALYZING DATA : RESEARCH OF CRITICAL BARRIERS , 1998 .

[29]  Yan Liu,et al.  EXPLORING STUDENTS’ CONCEPTIONS OF THE STANDARD DEVIATION , 2005 .

[30]  Joan Garfield,et al.  The GAISE Project: Developing Statistics Education Guidelines for Pre K-12 and College Courses: 2006 NCTM Yearbook , 2006 .

[31]  Dani Ben-Zvi,et al.  Research on Teaching and Learning Statistics , 2008 .

[32]  Chris Reading,et al.  Reasoning About Variation , 2004 .

[33]  Richard Lesh,et al.  Formulating Operational Definitions of Desired Outcomes of Instruction in Mathematics and Science Education. , 2000 .

[34]  Beth Chance,et al.  Reasoning about Sampling Distribitions , 2004 .

[35]  Joan Garfield,et al.  The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking , 2004 .

[36]  Mark N. Hoover,et al.  Principles for Developing Thought-Revealing Activities for Students and Teachers , 2000 .

[37]  Joan Garfield,et al.  A Model of Classroom Research in Action: Developing Simulation Activities to Improve Students' Statistical Reasoning , 1999, Journal of Statistics Education.

[38]  Tamara J. Moore,et al.  Designing Model Development Sequences for Engineering , 2008 .

[39]  C. Wild,et al.  Statistical Thinking in Empirical Enquiry , 1999 .

[40]  Jane Watson,et al.  The measurement of school students' understanding of statistical variation , 2003 .

[41]  Jane Watson,et al.  Expectation versus Variation: Students’ Decision Making in a Sampling Environment , 2006 .

[42]  Jane Watson,et al.  Variation in a Chance Sampling Setting: The Lollies Task , 2002 .

[43]  Refractor Uncertainty , 2001, The Lancet.