Exploitation of natural geometrical regularities facilitates target detection

We have evolved to operate within a dynamic visual world in which natural visual signals are not random but have various statistical regularities. Our rich experience of the probability structure of these regularities could influence visual computation. Considering that spatiotemporal regularity, co-linearity and co-circularity are common geometrical regularities in natural scenes, we explored how our visual system exploits these regularities to achieve accurate and efficient representations of the external world. By measuring human contrast detection performance of a briefly presented foveal target embedded in dynamic stimulus sequences (comprising six short bars appearing consecutively towards the fovea) imitating common regularity structures, we found that both contrast sensitivity and reaction time for target detection was facilitated by predictable spatiotemporal stimulus structure. Qualitatively consistent with natural image analysis that co-linearity is a stronger statistical feature than co-circularity, the facilitation in target detection was more evident for predictable stimulus sequences following a co-linear path than a co-circular path. Control experiments further showed that response bias and uncertainty reduction could not fully account for our observation. It seems that our visual system exploits geometrical natural regularities to facilitate the interpretation of incoming visual signals, such as constraining interpretation on the basis of contextual priors.

[1]  Norberto M Grzywacz,et al.  A Bayesian model of temporal frequency masking , 2000, Vision Research.

[2]  J. Elder,et al.  Ecological statistics of Gestalt laws for the perceptual organization of contours. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[3]  S. McKee,et al.  Predicting future motion. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[4]  D. Surmeier,et al.  Grouping of image fragments in primary visual cortex , 2022 .

[5]  A. Nobre,et al.  The hazards of time , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[6]  S P McKee,et al.  Stimulus configuration determines the detectability of motion signals in noise. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[7]  J. Enns,et al.  Object Substitution: A New Form of Masking in Unattended Visual Locations , 1997 .

[8]  Kenneth Hailston,et al.  Ambient sounds can enhance visual perception and memory performance in virtual environments , 2010 .

[9]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A theory of cortical responses , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Motion illusions as optimal percepts , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  C. Tyler,et al.  Lateral modulation of contrast discrimination: flanker orientation effects. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[12]  József Fiser,et al.  Coding of Natural Scenes in Primary Visual Cortex , 2003, Neuron.

[13]  Jeffrey S. Perry,et al.  Contour statistics in natural images: Grouping across occlusions , 2009, Visual Neuroscience.

[14]  M. Bar,et al.  Top-down predictions in the cognitive brain , 2007, Brain and Cognition.

[15]  Wu Li,et al.  Global contour saliency and local colinear interactions. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  M. Young,et al.  The architecture of visual cortex and inferential processes in vision. , 2000, Spatial vision.

[17]  Petra M.J. Pollux,et al.  Event-related potential correlates of spatiotemporal regularities in vision , 2009, Neuroreport.

[18]  D. Samuel Schwarzkopf,et al.  Experience Shapes the Utility of Natural Statistics for Perceptual Contour Integration , 2008, Current Biology.

[19]  D. C. Beardslee,et al.  Readings in perception , 1958 .

[20]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and neural representation. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[21]  M. Carandini,et al.  Testing the Bayesian model of perceived speed , 2002, Vision Research.

[22]  Suzanne P. McKee,et al.  Constraints on long range interactions mediating contour detection , 1998, Vision Research.

[23]  C. Gilbert,et al.  On a common circle: natural scenes and Gestalt rules. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  S. Coren,et al.  Principles of perceptual organization and spatial distortion: the gestalt illusions. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Fuhui Long,et al.  Spectral statistics in natural scenes predict hue, saturation, and brightness. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  A. Thiele,et al.  Attention and contrast differently affect contextual integration in an orientation discrimination task , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Brain States: Top-Down Influences in Sensory Processing , 2007, Neuron.

[28]  C. Summerfield,et al.  A Neural Representation of Prior Information during Perceptual Inference , 2008, Neuron.

[29]  William Bialek,et al.  Statistics of Natural Images: Scaling in the Woods , 1993, NIPS.

[30]  D. Knill,et al.  The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[31]  Preeti Verghese,et al.  Collinear facilitation is largely uncertainty reduction. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[32]  Alexander Thiele,et al.  Effects on orientation perception of manipulating the spatio–temporal prior probability of stimuli , 2004, Vision Research.

[33]  M. Young,et al.  Spatio‐temporal prediction and inference by V1 neurons , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[34]  Vivian M Ciaramitaro,et al.  Stimulus probability directs spatial attention: an enhancement of sensitivity in humans and monkeys , 2001, Vision Research.

[35]  W. Geisler Visual perception and the statistical properties of natural scenes. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[36]  D G Pelli,et al.  Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[37]  D. Sagi,et al.  Effects of spatial configuration on contrast detection , 1998, Vision Research.

[38]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[39]  Masataka Watanabe,et al.  Role of anticipated reward in cognitive behavioral control , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[40]  Bradley J Wolfgang,et al.  Spatial uncertainty explains exogenous and endogenous attentional cuing effects in visual signal detection. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[41]  P. Lennie Single Units and Visual Cortical Organization , 1998, Perception.

[42]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Inhibitory interactions in MT receptive fields , 2010 .

[43]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Spatial summation and its interaction with the temporal integration mechanism in human motion perception , 1994, Vision Research.

[44]  E. London,et al.  Steroid binding at sigma receptors suggests a link between endocrine, nervous, and immune systems. , 1988, Science.

[45]  U. Polat,et al.  The architecture of perceptual spatial interactions , 1994, Vision Research.

[46]  Mark A. Bullimore The Psychophysical Measurement of Visual Function. , 2002 .

[47]  Jeffrey S. Perry,et al.  Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance , 2001, Vision Research.

[48]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field” , 1993, Vision Research.

[49]  Piers D. L. Howe,et al.  A laminar cortical model of monocular and binocular interactions in depth perception , 2010 .

[50]  M. Roggemann,et al.  Power spectrum and Fourier phase spectrum estimation by using fully and partially compensating adaptive optics and bispectrum postprocessing , 1992 .

[51]  U. Polat,et al.  Lateral interactions between spatial channels: Suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments , 1993, Vision Research.

[52]  W. Richards,et al.  Perception as Bayesian Inference , 2008 .

[53]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Probabilistic Models of the Brain: Perception and Neural Function , 2002 .

[54]  M. Young,et al.  Centre‐surround interactions in response to natural scene stimulation in the primary visual cortex , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[55]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Selectivity for polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian gratings in macaque visual cortex. , 1993, Science.

[56]  H. Basford,et al.  Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search , 2005 .

[57]  T. Albright,et al.  Contextual influences on visual processing. , 2002, Annual review of neuroscience.

[58]  D. Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.

[59]  I Kovács,et al.  A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: effect of closure in figure-ground segmentation. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  J L Gallant,et al.  Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision. , 2000, Science.

[61]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Contour Saliency in Primary Visual Cortex , 2006, Neuron.

[62]  Robert F. Hess,et al.  Dynamics of contour integration , 2001, Vision Research.

[63]  Jun-ichiro Kawahara,et al.  Contextual cueing effect in three-dimensional layouts , 2010 .

[64]  Robert Sekuler,et al.  Learning to imitate novel motion sequences. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[65]  Daniel Kersten,et al.  Bayesian models of object perception , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[66]  M. Bar The proactive brain: using analogies and associations to generate predictions , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[67]  Serge O. Dumoulin,et al.  Cortical specialization for concentric shape processing , 2007, Vision Research.

[68]  R. F Hess,et al.  Contour integration and cortical processing , 2003, Journal of Physiology-Paris.