Irrelevant response effects improve serial learning in serial reaction time tasks.

Tones were introduced into a serial reaction time (SRT) task to serve as redundant response effects. Experiment 1 showed that the tones improved serial learning with a 10-element stimulus sequence, but only if the tone effects were mapped onto the responses contingently. Experiment 2 demonstrated that switching to noncontingent response-effect mapping increased SRT only when participants had previously adapted to contingent response-effect mapping. In Experiment 3, the beneficial influence of contingent tone effects on serial learning occurred only when there was sufficient time between the response effects and the next imperative stimuli. The results are discussed in terms of the ideomotor principle. It is claimed that an internal representation of the to-be-produced tone effects develops and gains control over the execution of the response sequence.

[1]  G Aschersleben,et al.  Synchronizing actions with events: The role of sensory information , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  B. Hommel.  PERCEIVING ONE'S OWN ACTION : AND WHAT IT LEADS TO , 1998 .

[3]  Shanks,et al.  Implicit knowledge in sequential learning tasks , 1998 .

[4]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Stimulus and response anticipation in a serial reaction task , 1997 .

[5]  K. Lashley.  The problem of serial order in behavior , 1951 .

[6]  J Hoffmann,et al.  [Stimulus and reaction patterns in serial choice reactions]. , 1996, Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie.

[7]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Learning the structure of event sequences. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  Joachim Hoffmann,et al.  Implicit learning of loosely defined structures , 1998 .

[9]  M. Ziessler.  The impact of motor responses on serial-pattern learning , 1994, Psychological research.

[10]  P. Frensch,et al.  Effects of presentation rate and individual differences in short-term memory capacity on an indirect measure of serial learning , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[11]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  H. Heuer,et al.  Perspectives on Perception and Action , 1989 .

[13]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[14]  Herbert Heuer,et al.  Task integration as a factor in secondary-task effects on sequence learning , 1997 .

[15]  Peter Bullemer,et al.  On the development of procedural knowledge. , 1989 .

[16]  D. Shanks,et al.  Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Die Reaktion als Willenshandlung , 1998 .

[18]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: with special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. , 1970, Psychological review.

[19]  Luis Jiménez,et al.  Which Attention Is Needed for Implicit Sequence Learning , 1999 .

[20]  W. Prinz.  Perception and Action Planning , 1997 .

[21]  W. James,et al.  The Principles of Psychology. , 1983 .

[22]  B Hommel,et al.  The cognitive representation of action: Automatic integration of perceived action effects , 1996, Psychological research.

[23]  Joachim Hoffmann,et al.  Lernmechanismen zum Erwerb verhaltenssteuernden Wissens , 2000 .

[24]  Michael A. Stadler,et al.  Handbook of implicit learning , 1998 .

[25]  W. Wundt,et al.  Grundzüge der physiologischen psyhcologie , 1893 .

[26]  F. Restle,et al.  Serial pattern learning: Pretraining of runs and trills , 1970 .

[27]  G Aschersleben,et al.  Delayed auditory feedback in synchronization. , 1997, Journal of motor behavior.

[28]  U. Mayr,et al.  Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  A. Reber.  Implicit learning of artificial grammars , 1967 .

[30]  L. A. Jeffress,et al.  Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior , 1953 .

[31]  D. Howard,et al.  Serial pattern learning by event observation. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  H. Ebbinghaus,et al.  Grundzüge der Psychologie , 1902 .

[33]  Joachim Hoffmann,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility and sequential learning in the serial reaction time task , 1997 .

[34]  Pearce.  Animal learning and cognition , 1997 .

[35]  Richard I. Ivry,et al.  Attention and structure in sequence learning. , 1990 .

[36]  Jon Driver,et al.  Covert Spatial Orienting in Audition: Exogenous and Endogenous Mechanisms , 1994 .

[37]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  The question of awareness in research on implicit learning , 1998 .

[38]  Pawel Lewicki,et al.  Acquisition of procedural knowledge about a pattern of stimuli that cannot be articulated , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[39]  Michael Ziessler,et al.  Response-effect learning as a major component of implicit serial learning , 1998 .

[40]  A. Healy,et al.  Long-term repetition effects for motoric and perceptual procedures. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  P. Frensch,et al.  Implicit learning of unique and ambiguous serial transitions in the presence and absence of a distractor task. , 1994 .

[42]  B. Hommel.  Inverting the Simon effect intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. , 1993 .

[43]  Thomas Goschke,et al.  Implicit learning of perceptual and motor sequences: Evidence for independent learning systems. , 1998 .

[44]  Wilfried Kunde,et al.  The impact of anticipated action effects on action planning. , 2002, Acta psychologica.