A dynamic clustering and scheduling approach to energy saving in data collection from wireless sensor networks

Energy consumption is one of the major con- straints in wireless sensor networks. A highly feasible strat- egy is to aggressively reduce the spatial sampling rate of sensors (i.e., the density of the measure points in a field). By properly scheduling, we want to retain the high quality of data collection. In this paper, we propose a novel dynamic clustering and scheduling approach. Orthogonal to most ex- isting methods which mainly utilize the overlaps of sensing ranges of sensors to reduce the spatial sampling rate, our method is based on a careful analysis of the surveillance data reported by the sensors. We dynamically partition the sensors into groups so that the sensors in the same group have similar surveillance time series. They can share the workload of data collection in the future since their future readings may likely be similar. A generic framework is de- veloped to address several important technical challenges, including how to partition the sensors into groups, how to dynamically maintain the groups, and how to schedule sam- pling for the sensors in a group. We conduct an extensive empirical study to test our method using both a real test bed system and a large-scale synthetic dataset.

[1]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[2]  David Zuckerman,et al.  NP-complete problems have a version that's hard to approximate , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the Eigth Annual Structure in Complexity Theory Conference.

[3]  Carsten Lund,et al.  On the hardness of approximating minimization problems , 1993, STOC.

[4]  Khalid Sayood,et al.  Introduction to Data Compression , 1996 .

[5]  Roy Want,et al.  Making Everyday Life Easier Using Dense Sensor Networks , 2001, UbiComp.

[6]  Di Tian,et al.  A coverage-preserving node scheduling scheme for large wireless sensor networks , 2002, WSNA '02.

[7]  Petra Perner,et al.  Data Mining - Concepts and Techniques , 2002, Künstliche Intell..

[8]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  The impact of data aggregation in wireless sensor networks , 2002, Proceedings 22nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops.

[9]  John Anderson,et al.  Wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring , 2002, WSNA '02.

[10]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Impact of network density on data aggregation in wireless sensor networks , 2002, Proceedings 22nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems.

[11]  Jan M. Rabaey,et al.  Data funneling: routing with aggregation and compression for wireless sensor networks , 2003, Proceedings of the First IEEE International Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications, 2003..

[12]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Dimensions: why do we need a new data handling architecture for sensor networks? , 2003, CCRV.

[13]  Tian He,et al.  Differentiated surveillance for sensor networks , 2003, SenSys '03.

[14]  Songwu Lu,et al.  PEAS: a robust energy conserving protocol for long-lived sensor networks , 2003, 23rd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, 2003. Proceedings..

[15]  Konstantinos Psounis,et al.  Modeling spatially-correlated sensor network data , 2004, 2004 First Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, 2004. IEEE SECON 2004..

[16]  Divyakant Agrawal,et al.  BINOCULAR: a system monitoring framework , 2004, DMSN '04.

[17]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Call and response: experiments in sampling the environment , 2004, SenSys '04.

[18]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  On Exploiting Spatial and Temporal Correlation in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2004 .

[19]  Mingyan Liu,et al.  Network coverage using low duty-cycled sensors: random & coordinated sleep algorithms , 2004, Third International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2004. IPSN 2004.