Design methodology of an active back-support exoskeleton with adaptable backbone-based kinematics

Abstract Manual labor is still strongly present in many industrial contexts (such as aerospace industry). Such operations commonly involve onerous tasks requiring to work in non-ergonomic conditions and to manipulate heavy parts. As a result, work-related musculoskeletal disorders are a major problem to tackle in workplace. In particular, back is one of the most affected regions. To solve such issue, many efforts have been made in the design and control of exoskeleton devices, relieving the human from the task load. Besides upper limbs and lower limbs exoskeletons, back-support exoskeletons have been also investigated, proposing both passive and active solutions. While passive solutions cannot empower the human's capabilities, common active devices are rigid, without the possibility to track the human's spine kinematics while executing the task. The here proposed paper describes a methodology to design an active back-support exoskeleton with backbone-based kinematics. On the basis of the (easily implementable) scissor hinge mechanism, a one-degree of freedom device has been designed. In particular, the resulting device allows tracking the motion of a reference vertebra, i.e., the vertebrae in the correspondence of the connection between the scissor hinge mechanism and the back of the operator. Therefore, the proposed device is capable to adapt to the human posture, guaranteeing the support while relieving the person from the task load. In addition, the proposed mechanism can be easily optimized and realized for different subjects, involving a subject-based design procedure, making possible to adapt its kinematics to track the spine motion of the specific user. A prototype of the proposed device has been 3D-printed to show the achieved kinematics. Preliminary tests for discomfort evaluation show the potential of the proposed methodology, foreseeing extensive subjects-based optimization, realization and testing of the device.

[1]  Vincent Bonnet,et al.  Ergonomic contribution of ABLE exoskeleton in automotive industry , 2014 .

[2]  Frank Krause,et al.  Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load , 2016, Ergonomics.

[3]  Darwin G. Caldwell,et al.  A Powered Low-Back Exoskeleton for Industrial Handling: Considerations on Controls , 2017 .

[4]  Abdelfetah Hentout,et al.  Human–robot interaction in industrial collaborative robotics: a literature review of the decade 2008–2017 , 2019, Adv. Robotics.

[5]  Idsart Kingma,et al.  Effects of a passive exoskeleton on the mechanical loading of the low back in static holding tasks. , 2019, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Pedro Arezes,et al.  A Brief Overview of the Use of Collaborative Robots in Industry 4.0: Human Role and Safety , 2019, Studies in Systems, Decision and Control.

[7]  John E. Osborn,et al.  The principle of virtual work and integral laws of motion , 1979 .

[8]  M. de Looze,et al.  Assessment of an active industrial exoskeleton to aid dynamic lifting and lowering manual handling tasks. , 2018, Applied Ergonomics.

[9]  Katja D. Mombaur,et al.  Motion Optimization and Parameter Identification for a Human and Lower Back Exoskeleton Model , 2017, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[10]  Tamim Asfour,et al.  New mechanism for a 3 DOF exoskeleton hip joint with five revolute and two prismatic joints , 2016, 2016 6th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).

[11]  Mathias Keil,et al.  Subjective Evaluation of a Passive Industrial Exoskeleton for Lower-back Support: A Field Study in the Automotive Sector , 2019, IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors.

[12]  Leonard O'Sullivan,et al.  Elongation of the surface of the spine during lifting and lowering, and implications for design of an upper body industrial exoskeleton. , 2018, Applied ergonomics.

[13]  Joan M. Stevenson,et al.  Testing the efficacy of an ergonomic lifting aid at diminishing muscular fatigue in women over a prolonged period of lifting , 2009 .

[14]  Axel S. Koopman,et al.  SPEXOR passive spinal exoskeleton decreases metabolic cost during symmetric repetitive lifting , 2019, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[15]  Duc Truong Pham,et al.  Human-robot collaboration in disassembly for sustainable manufacturing , 2019, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[16]  G. Mawston,et al.  Influencing lumbar posture through real-time biofeedback and its effects on the kinematics and kinetics of a repetitive lifting task. , 2019, Gait & posture.

[17]  Benjamin Steinhilber,et al.  Subjective Evaluation of a Passive Lower-Limb Industrial Exoskeleton Used During simulated Assembly , 2019, IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors.

[18]  Jian Feng,et al.  Kinematic of symmetric deployable scissor-hinge structures with integral mechanism mode , 2017 .

[19]  Babak Bazrgari,et al.  Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[20]  Nicolás García Aracil,et al.  Advantages of the Incorporation of an Active Upper-Limb Exoskeleton in Industrial Tasks , 2019, ROBOT.

[21]  Alberto Tellaeche,et al.  PIROS: Cooperative, Safe and Reconfigurable Robotic Companion for CNC Pallets Load/Unload Stations , 2020, EuRoC.

[22]  Homayoon Kazerooni,et al.  Lower Extremity Exoskeleton Reduces Back Forces in Lifting , 2009 .

[23]  Y. Kakazu,et al.  Development of wearable exoskeleton power assist system for lower back support , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[24]  Lorenzo Grazi,et al.  A Low-Back Exoskeleton can Reduce the Erector Spinae Muscles Activity During Freestyle Symmetrical Load Lifting Tasks , 2018, 2018 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob).

[25]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Passive Back Support Exoskeleton Improves Range of Motion Using Flexible Beams , 2018, Front. Robot. AI.

[26]  K. Weber,et al.  Recovering the capability to work among patients with chronic low Back pain after a four-week, multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation program: 18-month follow-up study , 2019, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[27]  Joan M. Stevenson,et al.  Effect of an on-body ergonomic aid on oxygen consumption during a repetitive lifting task , 2014 .

[28]  D. Marquardt.  An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[29]  Ramazan Ünal,et al.  ANT-M: Design of Passive Lower-Limb Exoskeleton for Weight-Bearing Assistance in Industry , 2018 .

[30]  Huayong Yang,et al.  Wearable Sensors and Robots : Proceedings of International Conference on Wearable Sensors and Robots 2015 , 2017 .

[31]  M. de Looze,et al.  The effects of a passive exoskeleton on muscle activity, discomfort and endurance time in forward bending work. , 2016, Applied ergonomics.

[32]  Yang Lu,et al.  Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues , 2017, J. Ind. Inf. Integr..

[33]  Jia-Hua Lin,et al.  Are Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Claims Related to Risk Factors in Workplaces of the Manufacturing Industry? , 2019, Annals of work exposures and health.

[34]  Sang D. Choi,et al.  Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among construction workers in the United States from 1992 to 2014 , 2016, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[35]  Koray Korkmaz,et al.  A review of planar scissor structural mechanisms: geometric principles and design methods , 2011 .

[36]  Ting Zhang,et al.  A Lower-Back Robotic Exoskeleton: Industrial Handling Augmentation Used to Provide Spinal Support , 2018, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[37]  H. Houdijk,et al.  The effect of a passive trunk exoskeleton on functional performance in healthy individuals. , 2018, Applied ergonomics.

[38]  Francesco Braghin,et al.  Mechanical and Control Design of an Industrial Exoskeleton for Advanced Human Empowering in Heavy Parts Manipulation Tasks , 2019, Robotics.

[39]  Maxime Raison,et al.  Design of an assistive trunk exoskeleton based on multibody dynamic modelling , 2019, ArXiv.

[40]  Maria Pia Cavatorta,et al.  Investigation into the applicability of a passive upper-limb exoskeleton in automotive industry , 2017 .

[41]  Jung-Yong Kim,et al.  Measurement of trunk muscle fatigue during dynamic lifting and lowering as recovery time changes , 2007 .

[42]  Hao Su,et al.  Spine-Inspired Continuum Soft Exoskeleton for Stoop Lifting Assistance , 2019, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[43]  Divya Srinivasan,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Passive Back-Support Exoskeletons in a Precision Manual Assembly Task: “Expected” Effects on Trunk Muscle Activity, Perceived Exertion, and Task Performance , 2020, Hum. Factors.

[44]  Gary A. Mirka,et al.  Accuracy of a three-dimensional lumbar motion monitor for recording dynamic trunk motion characteristics , 1992 .

[45]  Darwin G. Caldwell,et al.  Assistive Strategies for a Back Support Exoskeleton: Experimental Evaluation , 2017, RAAD.

[46]  R. K. P. S. Ranaweera,et al.  ChairX: A Robotic Exoskeleton Chair for Industrial Workers , 2019, 2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[47]  Alessandro Scano,et al.  An Experimental Evaluation of the Proto-MATE: A Novel Ergonomic Upper-Limb Exoskeleton to Reduce Workers' Physical Strain , 2020, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[48]  Robert Bogue,et al.  Exoskeletons - a review of industrial applications , 2018, Ind. Robot.

[49]  Dong Jin Hyun,et al.  Waist-assistive exoskeleton powered by a singular actuation mechanism for prevention of back-injury , 2018, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[50]  J. Katz,et al.  Lumbar disc disorders and low-back pain: socioeconomic factors and consequences. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.