Effect of network topology on the evolutionary ultimatum game based on the net-profit decision

Abstract The ubiquity of altruist behavior amongst humans has long been a significant puzzle in the social sciences. Ultimatum game has proved to be a useful tool for explaining altruistic behavior among selfish individuals. In an ultimatum game where alternating roles exist, we suppose that players make their decisions based on the net profit of their own. In this paper, we specify a player’s strategy with two parameters: offer level α ∈ [ 0,1) and net profit acceptance level β ∈ [ − 1,1). By Monte Carlo simulation, we analyze separately the effect of the size of the neighborhood, the small-world property and the heterogeneity of the degree distributions of the networks. Results show that compared with results observed for homogeneous networks, heterogeneous networks lead to more rational outcomes. Moreover, network structure has no effect on the evolution of kindness level, so moderate kindness is adaptable to any social groups and organizations.

[1]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Foundations of Human Sociality - Economic Experiments and Ethnographic: Evidence From Fifteen Small-Scale Societies , 2004 .

[2]  Hiroki Sayama,et al.  Evolution of Fairness in the Not Quite Ultimatum Game , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[3]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  Anonymity versus Punishment in Ultimatum Bargaining , 1995 .

[4]  Long Wang,et al.  Evolution of Cooperation on Stochastic Dynamical Networks , 2010, PloS one.

[5]  Á. Sánchez,et al.  The spatial Ultimatum game revisited. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[7]  J. Gómez-Gardeñes,et al.  From scale-free to Erdos-Rényi networks. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[9]  W. Güth,et al.  An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining , 1982 .

[10]  Lang Cao,et al.  Largest Laplacian eigenvalue predicts the emergence of costly punishment in the evolutionary ultimatum game on networks. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  M. Nowak,et al.  Stochastic dynamics of invasion and fixation. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[12]  Long Wang,et al.  The coevolutionary ultimatum game , 2011 .

[13]  M. Nowak,et al.  Empathy leads to fairness , 2002, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[14]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Rock-scissors-paper game on regular small-world networks , 2004 .

[15]  S. Zamir,et al.  Bargaining and Market Behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An Experimental Study , 1991 .

[16]  Long Wang,et al.  Effects of partner choice and role assignation in the spatial ultimatum game , 2015, EPL (Europhysics Letters).

[17]  Jianmei Yang,et al.  Evolutionary ultimatum game on complex networks under incomplete information , 2010 .

[18]  M. Kuperman,et al.  The effect of the topology on the spatial ultimatum game , 2007, 0711.2165.

[19]  G. Szabó,et al.  Evolutionary prisoner's dilemma game on a square lattice , 1997, cond-mat/9710096.

[20]  M. Nowak,et al.  The spatial ultimatum game , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  V. Latora,et al.  Complex networks: Structure and dynamics , 2006 .

[22]  G. Szabó,et al.  Defense mechanisms of empathetic players in the spatial ultimatum game. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[23]  Wansheng Tang,et al.  The coevolutionary ultimatum game on different network topologies , 2011 .

[24]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition , 2000 .

[25]  M. Nowak,et al.  A generalized adaptive dynamics framework can describe the evolutionary Ultimatum Game. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Chivalry and Solidarity in Ultimatum Games , 2001 .

[27]  E. Fehr,et al.  Altruistic punishment in humans , 2002, Nature.

[28]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Accuracy in strategy imitations promotes the evolution of fairness in the spatial ultimatum game , 2012, 1211.1964.

[29]  Zhen Wang,et al.  The evolution of fairness in the coevolutionary ultimatum games , 2013 .

[30]  Il Hong Suh,et al.  Degree-based assignation of roles in ultimatum games on scale-free networks , 2013 .

[31]  Long Wang,et al.  Adaptive role switching promotes fairness in networked ultimatum game , 2013, Scientific reports.

[32]  Angel Sánchez,et al.  Altruism may arise from individual selection. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[33]  A. Rubinstein Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model , 1982 .

[34]  Ángel Sánchez,et al.  Evolutionary game theory: Temporal and spatial effects beyond replicator dynamics , 2009, Physics of life reviews.

[35]  Lu Wang,et al.  The evolutionary analysis of the ultimatum game based on the net-profit decision , 2015 .

[36]  Colin Camerer Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2003 .

[37]  Gengui Zhou,et al.  A network growth model based on the evolutionary ultimatum game , 2012 .

[38]  Nam-Kyung Lee,et al.  Non-ideality of polymer melts confined to nanotubes , 2011 .