The value of privacy: optimal strategies for privacy minded agents

Agents often want to protect private information, while at the same acting upon the information. These two desires are in conflict, and this conflict can be modeled in strategic games where the utility not only depends on the expected value of the possible outcomes, but also on the information properties of the strategy an agent uses. In this paper we define two such games using the information theory concepts of entropy and relative entropy. For both games we compute optimal response strategies and establish the existence of Nash equilibria.

[1]  Lawrence S. Moss,et al.  The Logic of Public Announcements and Common Knowledge and Private Suspicions , 1998, TARK.

[2]  Barteld P. Kooi,et al.  Probabilistic Dynamic Epistemic Logic , 2003, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[3]  E. Damme Refinements of the Nash Equilibrium Concept , 1983 .

[4]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[5]  David Chaum,et al.  The dining cryptographers problem: Unconditional sender and recipient untraceability , 1988, Journal of Cryptology.

[6]  J. Nash,et al.  NON-COOPERATIVE GAMES , 1951, Classics in Game Theory.

[7]  E. Maasland,et al.  Auction Theory , 2021, Springer Texts in Business and Economics.

[8]  S. Shelah,et al.  Annals of Pure and Applied Logic , 1991 .

[9]  Joseph Y. Halpern Reasoning about uncertainty , 2003 .

[10]  Thomas A. Henzinger,et al.  Alternating-time temporal logic , 1997, Proceedings 38th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[11]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[12]  Hans van Ditmarsch,et al.  The Russian Cards Problem , 2003, Stud Logica.

[13]  Felix Brandt,et al.  (Im)possibility of unconditionally privacy-preserving auctions , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..

[14]  Andrew M. Odlyzko,et al.  Privacy, economics, and price discrimination on the Internet , 2003, ICEC '03.

[15]  Martin Aigner,et al.  Proofs from THE BOOK , 1998 .

[16]  Ronald Fagin,et al.  Reasoning about knowledge , 1995 .

[17]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Tractable multiagent planning for epistemic goals , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[18]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  MODEL CHECKING A KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE SCENARIO , 2004, Appl. Artif. Intell..