Bargaining in spectrum auctions: A review of the German auction in 2015

Germany was the first country in Europe that auctioned off spectrum in the valuable 700 MHz band for mobile telecommunication usage. The German regulator decided to sell this spectrum together with spectrum in the 900 MHz and 1800 MHz legacy bands. With only the three incumbent operators bidding in the auction and a relatively transparent auction design, it was possible to get a very clear impression of the actual bidding behaviour. We show that in the beginning of the auction, bidders were actively searching for a way to allocate the available spectrum that all bidders could agree to at low prices. Bidders were teaching each other what they should bid and were providing carrots and sticks. When the excess demand was concentrated in one band only, bidders started to compete head on leading to a war of attrition. This competition only stopped when bidders started to raise prices in bands that were already cleared. We interpret this bidding behaviour in terms of bidders expressing allocative externalities and conclude that the ability to do so may be regarded as a positive aspect of the transparent design.

[1]  J. Banks,et al.  Allocating uncertain and unresponsive resources: an experimental approach. , 1989, The Rand journal of economics.

[2]  Faruk Gul,et al.  WALRASIAN EQUILIBRIUM WITH GROSS SUBSTITUTES , 1999 .

[3]  Elmar G. Wolfstetter,et al.  The Third Generation (Umts) Spectrum Auction in Germany , 2001, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[4]  Elmar G. Wolfstetter,et al.  Low Price Equilibrium in Multi-Unit Auctions: The Gsm Spectrum Auction in Germany , 2001, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[5]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Spectrum Auction Design: Simple Auctions for Complex Sales , 2013 .

[6]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Putting Auction Theory to Work: The Simultaneous Ascending Auction , 1999, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  Tomasz P. Michalak,et al.  Combinatorial auctions with externalities , 2010, AAMAS.

[8]  B. Moldovanu,et al.  Auctions with Downstream Interaction Among Buyers , 2000 .

[9]  Axel Ockenfels,et al.  The German 4G Spectrum Auction: Design and Behaviour , 2017 .

[10]  E. Stacchetti,et al.  How (not) to sell nuclear weapons , 1996 .

[11]  M. Janssen,et al.  Auctions, aftermarket competition, and risk attitudes , 2009 .

[12]  Christian Dustmann,et al.  Strange Bids: Bidding Behaviour in the United Kingdom's Third Generation Spectrum Auction , 2001 .

[13]  P. Klemperer How (Not) to Run Auctions: The European 3g Telecom Auctions , 2001 .

[14]  Annett Baier Spectrum Auctions And Competition In Telecommunications , 2016 .

[15]  Christian Ewerhart,et al.  The German Umts Design: Insights from Multi-Object Auction Theory , 2002, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[16]  Ronald H. Coase,et al.  The Federal Communications Commission , 1959, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[17]  P. Cramton Simultaneous Ascending Auctions , 2004 .

[18]  Maarten C. W. Janssen,et al.  Do Auctions Select Efficient Firms? , 2007 .

[19]  Lawrence M. Ausubel,et al.  Demand Reduction and Inefficiency in Multi-Unit Auctions , 2014 .

[20]  Jacob K. Goeree,et al.  Bidding for the future: signaling in auctions with an aftermarket , 2003, J. Econ. Theory.

[21]  R. Weber Making More from Less: Strategic Demand Reduction in the FCC Spectrum Auctions , 1997 .

[22]  F. Kelly,et al.  A Combinatorial Auction with Multiple Winners for Universal Service , 2000 .

[23]  Jacob K. Goeree,et al.  An Equilibrium Analysis of the Simultaneous Ascending Auction , 2009, J. Econ. Theory.