On the Dynamic Similarity Between Bipeds and Quadrupeds: A Case Study on Bounding

In this letter, we identify passive dynamic bounding gaits of quadrupedal robots and investigate the dynamic similarities between these gaits and those of a bipedal model. For this purpose, we develop a passive dynamic bounding model of a quadruped with an extended main body. This model is based on the established SLIP model, yet has dynamic swing leg motions instead of a predefined angle of attack. We present a gait-identification framework that is based on a numerical continuation approach and that allows us to find all possible passive periodic motions that emerge from pronking and bounding in place. These gaits include forward pronking as well as forward bounding with gathered suspension, extended suspension, and with two suspensions. By conducting a parameter study on the body inertia, we can draw parallels between bipedal and quadrupedal gaits, and can also show how the structure of possible solutions changes with the main body inertia. In particular, we see sudden changes in the gait structure at certain critical values of the main body inertia. This letter shows connections between different types of quadrupedal gaits and may serve as a guideline in the design and control of gaits for energetically economical legged robots. It also sheds some light at the question why animals with different morphology use different gaits at the same Froude numbers.

[1]  William Yang,et al.  Spine morphology and energetics: how principles from nature apply to robotics , 2018, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[2]  G. Cavagna,et al.  The sources of external work in level walking and running. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  R. Blickhan The spring-mass model for running and hopping. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Andreas Merker,et al.  Numerical bifurcation analysis of the bipedal spring-mass model , 2015 .

[5]  Hartmut Witte,et al.  Comparing the effect of different spine and leg designs for a small bounding quadruped robot , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[6]  Shawn M. O’Connor,et al.  The relative roles of dynamics and control in bipedal locomotion , 2009 .

[7]  M. Coleman,et al.  The simplest walking model: stability, complexity, and scaling. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[8]  M. Hildebrand The quadrupedal gaits of vertebrates , 1989 .

[9]  A. Hof Scaling gait data to body size , 1996 .

[10]  C. David Remy,et al.  RAMone: A planar biped for studying the energetics of gait , 2017, 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[11]  Avik De,et al.  Modular Hopping and Running via Parallel Composition , 2017 .

[12]  Sangbae Kim,et al.  High-speed bounding with the MIT Cheetah 2: Control design and experiments , 2017, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[13]  R J Full,et al.  Templates and anchors: neuromechanical hypotheses of legged locomotion on land. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[14]  C. R. Taylor,et al.  Energetic Cost of Locomotion in Kangaroos , 1973, Nature.

[15]  B. Demes,et al.  Gait mechanics of lemurid primates on terrestrial and arboreal substrates. , 2005, Journal of human evolution.

[16]  Alan M. Wilson,et al.  High speed galloping in the cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) and the racing greyhound (Canis familiaris): spatio-temporal and kinetic characteristics , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[17]  R. Alexander,et al.  A dynamic similarity hypothesis for the gaits of quadrupedal mammals , 2009 .

[18]  G. Cavagna,et al.  Energetics and mechanics of terrestrial locomotion. III. Energy changes of the centre of mass as a function of speed and body size in birds and mammals. , 1982, The Journal of experimental biology.

[19]  D. De Clercq,et al.  Biomechanics of human bipedal gallop: asymmetry dictates leg function , 2013, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[20]  Kevin M. Lynch,et al.  Extending equilibria to periodic orbits for walkers using continuation methods , 2014, 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[21]  Yevgeniy Yesilevskiy,et al.  All common bipedal gaits emerge from a single passive model , 2018, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[22]  Yevgeniy Yesilevskiy,et al.  Selecting gaits for economical locomotion of legged robots , 2016, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[23]  Martin Hermann,et al.  Nonlinear Ordinary Differential Equations , 2016 .

[24]  C. T. Farley,et al.  Running springs: speed and animal size. , 1993, The Journal of experimental biology.

[25]  Martin Buehler,et al.  Quadruped Robot Running With a Bounding Gait , 2000, ISER.

[26]  A E Minetti,et al.  The biomechanics of skipping gaits: a third locomotion paradigm? , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  M. Hildebrand Analysis of Asymmetrical Gaits , 1977 .

[28]  Alberto E Minetti,et al.  Skipping vs. running as the bipedal gait of choice in hypogravity. , 2015, Journal of applied physiology.

[29]  R. Alexander Optimum walking techniques for quadrupeds and bipeds , 2009 .

[30]  Reinhard Blickhan,et al.  Compliant leg behaviour explains basic dynamics of walking and running , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  R. McN. Alexander,et al.  The Gaits of Bipedal and Quadrupedal Animals , 1984 .

[32]  T. McMahon,et al.  Ballistic walking. , 1980, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  J. Fleagle,et al.  Takeoff and landing forces of leaping strepsirhine primates. , 1999, Journal of human evolution.