Computational Grounded Cognition: a new alliance between grounded cognition and computational modeling

Grounded theories assume that there is no central module for cognition. According to this view, all cognitive phenomena, including those considered the province of amodal cognition such as reasoning, numeric, and language processing, are ultimately grounded in (and emerge from) a variety of bodily, affective, perceptual, and motor processes. The development and expression of cognition is constrained by the embodiment of cognitive agents and various contextual factors (physical and social) in which they are immersed. The grounded framework has received numerous empirical confirmations. Still, there are very few explicit computational models that implement grounding in sensory, motor and affective processes as intrinsic to cognition, and demonstrate that grounded theories can mechanistically implement higher cognitive abilities. We propose a new alliance between grounded cognition and computational modeling toward a novel multidisciplinary enterprise: Computational Grounded Cognition. We clarify the defining features of this novel approach and emphasize the importance of using the methodology of Cognitive Robotics, which permits simultaneous consideration of multiple aspects of grounding, embodiment, and situatedness, showing how they constrain the development and expression of cognition.

[1]  A. Cangelosi,et al.  Developmental Robotics: From Babies to Robots , 2015 .

[2]  Stanley B Klein,et al.  What memory is. , 2015, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[3]  J. Johnstone Supersizing the Mind , 2013 .

[4]  P. Cisek Making decisions through a distributed consensus , 2012, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[5]  R. N. Spreng,et al.  The Future of Memory: Remembering, Imagining, and the Brain , 2012, Neuron.

[6]  Chen Yu,et al.  Embodied attention and word learning by toddlers , 2012, Cognition.

[7]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  Unusual Bodies, Uncommon Behaviors: Individual and Group Differences in Embodied Cognition in Spatial Tasks , 2012, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[8]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Emergence of a 'visual number sense' in hierarchical generative models , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Biological Learning and Control: How the Brain Builds Representations, Predicts Events, and Makes Decisions , 2012 .

[10]  A. Cangelosi,et al.  Electrophysiological Examination of Embodiment in Vision and Action , 2012, Psychological science.

[11]  G. Pezzulo,et al.  Computational explorations of perceptual symbol systems theory , 2011 .

[12]  Oliver Lindemann,et al.  Finger Counting Habits in Middle Eastern and Western Individuals: An Online Survey , 2011 .

[13]  Lisa Feldman Barrett,et al.  Grounding emotion in situated conceptualization , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  The Mechanics of Embodiment: A Dialog on Embodiment and Computational Modeling , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[15]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  An Embodied Developmental Robotic Model of Interactions between Numbers and Space , 2011, CogSci.

[16]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  Epigenetic Robotics Architecture (ERA) , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development.

[17]  Ivilin Peev Stoianov,et al.  When Action Meets Emotions: How Facial Displays of Emotion Influence Goal-Related Behavior , 2010, PloS one.

[18]  Lawrence A. Shapiro Embodied Cognition , 2010 .

[19]  Frank Domahs,et al.  Embodied numerosity: Implicit hand-based representations influence symbolic number processing across cultures , 2010, Cognition.

[20]  Michael L. Anderson Neural reuse: A fundamental organizational principle of the brain , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[21]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Letting structure emerge: connectionist and dynamical systems approaches to cognition , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Probabilistic models of cognition: exploring representations and inductive biases , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.

[24]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  How to cook a SNARC: Number placement in text rapidly changes spatial–numerical associations , 2010, Brain and Cognition.

[25]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Through Neural Stimulation to Behavior Manipulation: A Novel Method for Analyzing Dynamical Cognitive Models , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[26]  Karl J. Friston The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[27]  Mirko Farina Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action and Cognitive Extension. , 2010 .

[28]  Thomas W. Schubert,et al.  Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology , 2009 .

[29]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Toward a Unified Theory of Development: Connectionism and Dynamic Systems Theory Re-Considered , 2009 .

[30]  M. H. Fischer,et al.  It takes just one word to quash a SNARC. , 2009, Experimental psychology.

[31]  Samuel T. Moulton,et al.  Imagining predictions: mental imagery as mental emulation , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  Demis Hassabis,et al.  The construction system of the brain , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  G. Pezzulo,et al.  Thinking as the control of imagination: a conceptual framework for goal-directed systems , 2009, Psychological research.

[34]  M. Sommer,et al.  Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[35]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content , 2008, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[36]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  Finger counting habits modulate spatial-numerical associations , 2008, Cortex.

[37]  L. Barsalou Grounded cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[38]  G. Schöner The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology: Dynamical Systems Approaches to Cognition , 2008 .

[39]  Timothy D. Hanks,et al.  Neurobiology of decision making: An intentional framework , 2008 .

[40]  Gregor Sch,et al.  Dynamical Systems Approaches to Cognition , 2008 .

[41]  Geoffrey E. Hinton Learning multiple layers of representation , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  Rob Ellis,et al.  Does selecting one visual object from several require inhibition of the actions associated with nonselected objects? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Cognition as coordinated non-cognition , 2007, Cognitive Processing.

[44]  Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al.  The symbol detachment problem , 2007, Cognitive Processing.

[45]  M. V. Velzen,et al.  Self-organizing maps , 2007 .

[46]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Bayesian brain : probabilistic approaches to neural coding , 2006 .

[47]  Wei Ji Ma,et al.  Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[48]  Rolf Pfeifer,et al.  How the body shapes the way we think - a new view on intelligence , 2006 .

[49]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  An Embodied Model for Sensorimotor Grounding and Grounding Transfer: Experiments With Epigenetic Robots , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[50]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Embodiment in Attitudes, Social Perception, and Emotion , 2005, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[51]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Brain mechanisms linking language and action , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[52]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Learning to predict by the methods of temporal differences , 1988, Machine Learning.

[53]  C. Hofsten An action perspective on motor development , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[54]  Takeshi Hatta,et al.  Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[55]  Rick Grush,et al.  The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[56]  Wolf Schwarz,et al.  Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[57]  C. Von Hofsten An action perspective on motor development. , 2004, Trends in cognitive sciences.

[58]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  The Continuity Of Mind , 2008 .

[59]  Paul F. M. J. Verschure,et al.  Environmentally mediated synergy between perception and behaviour in mobile robots , 2003, Nature.

[60]  Lawrence W Barsalou,et al.  Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[61]  L. Steels Evolving grounded communication for robots , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[62]  Paul F. M. J. Verschure,et al.  A real-world rational agent: unifying old and new AI , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[63]  Sergio E. Chaigneau,et al.  THE SIMILARITY-IN-TOPOGRAPHY PRINCIPLE: RECONCILING THEORIES OF CONCEPTUAL DEFICITS , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[64]  K. Doya,et al.  A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[65]  Margaret Wilson,et al.  Six views of embodied cognition , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[66]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Grounding language in action , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[67]  P. Haggard,et al.  Voluntary action and conscious awareness , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[68]  R. Ellis,et al.  The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization , 2001 .

[69]  A. Noë,et al.  A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[70]  M. Jeannerod Neural Simulation of Action: A Unifying Mechanism for Motor Cognition , 2001, NeuroImage.

[71]  R. A. Carlson,et al.  Acquisition of intellectual and perceptual-motor skills. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[72]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[73]  G. Lakoff Philosophy in the flesh , 1999 .

[74]  G Rizzolatti,et al.  The Space Around Us , 1997, Science.

[75]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[76]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  On Distinguishing Epistemic from Pragmatic Action , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[77]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[78]  A. Damasio Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: A systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition , 1989, Cognition.

[79]  S. Kosslyn Image and mind , 1982 .

[80]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[81]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[82]  R. Held,et al.  MOVEMENT-PRODUCED STIMULATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF VISUALLY GUIDED BEHAVIOR. , 1963, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.