Note orders suggest phrase-inserting structure in male Mueller’s gibbon songs: a case study
暂无分享,去创建一个
Kazuo Okanoya | Shigeto Yosida | Yoichi Inoue | Waidi Sinun | K. Okanoya | W. Sinun | Y. Inoue | Shigeto Yoshida
[1] Kazuo Okanoya,et al. Combinatory rules and chunk structure in male Mueller’s gibbon songs , 2017 .
[2] Thomas Geissmann,et al. The male song of the Javan silvery gibbon (Hylobates moloch) , 2005 .
[3] K. Zuberbühler. A syntactic rule in forest monkey communication , 2002, Animal Behaviour.
[4] Willem H. Zuidema,et al. Simple rules can explain discrimination of putative recursive syntactic structures by a songbird species , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[5] W. Thorpe,et al. Bird-Song: The Biology of Vocal Communication and Expression in Birds , 1961 .
[6] Colin G. Beer,et al. SOME COMPLEXITIES IN THE COMMUNICATION BEHAVIOR OF GULLS * , 1976 .
[7] Noam Chomsky,et al. The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002, Science.
[8] John G. Robinson. Syntactic Structures in the Vocalizations of Wedge-Capped Capuchin Monkeys, Cebus Olivaceus , 1984 .
[9] T. Geissmann. Inheritance of Song Parameters in the Gibbon Song, Analysed in 2 Hybrid Gibbons (Hylobates pileatus × H. lar) , 1984 .
[10] W. Tecumseh Fitch,et al. The Evolution of Human Language: Three meanings of “recursion”: key distinctions for biolinguistics , 2010 .
[11] J T Marshall,et al. Gibbons and Their Territorial Songs , 1976, Science.
[12] Michael C. Corballis,et al. Recursion, Language, and Starlings , 2007, Cogn. Sci..
[13] Tetsuro Matsuzawa,et al. Use of numbers by a chimpanzee , 1985, Nature.
[14] D. Bates,et al. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .
[15] R Core Team,et al. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .
[16] S. Pinker,et al. The faculty of language: what's special about it? , 2005, Cognition.
[17] Kazuo Okanoya,et al. Revisiting the syntactic abilities of non-human animals: natural vocalizations and artificial grammar learning , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[18] Timothy Q. Gentner,et al. Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds , 2006, Nature.
[19] C. Boesch,et al. Call combinations in wild chimpanzees , 2005 .
[20] Peter Marler,et al. A Phonological Analysis of Male Gibbon Singing Behavior , 1989 .
[21] Kazuo Okanoya,et al. Birdsong neurolinguistics: songbird context-free grammar claim is premature , 2012, Neuroreport.
[22] J. Hailman,et al. The ‘chick-a-dee’ calls of Parus atricapillus: A recombinant system of animal communication compared with written English , 1985 .
[23] Alyssa Frandsen,et al. Bird's Eye , 2010 .
[24] Timothy E. J. Behrens,et al. The evolution of the arcuate fasciculus revealed with comparative DTI , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.
[25] A. Anwander,et al. The brain differentiates human and non-human grammars: Functional localization and structural connectivity , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[26] Klaus Zuberbühler,et al. Language evolution: Semantic combinations in primate calls , 2006, Nature.
[27] Paul M. Pietroski,et al. The Language faculty , 2012 .
[28] E. H. Haimoff. The organization of song in Müller’s Gibbon (Hylobates muelleri) , 1985, International Journal of Primatology.
[29] W. Brockelman,et al. Inheritance of stereotyped gibbon calls , 1984, Nature.
[30] Kentaro Abe,et al. Songbirds possess the spontaneous ability to discriminate syntactic rules , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.
[31] Dora Biro,et al. Use of numerical symbols by the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): Cardinals, ordinals, and the introduction of zero , 2001, Animal Cognition.
[32] M. Peyrot. Syntax and meaning , 2013 .
[33] Mauricio Martins,et al. Investigating Recursion Within a Domain-Specific Framework , 2014 .
[34] K. Zuberbühler,et al. The Syntax and Meaning of Wild Gibbon Songs , 2006, PloS one.
[35] T. Matsuzawa,et al. Working memory of numerals in chimpanzees , 2007, Current Biology.
[36] R. Berwick,et al. A Bird’s Eye View of Human Language Evolution , 2012, Front. Evol. Neurosci..
[37] W. Fitch,et al. Computational Constraints on Syntactic Processing in a Nonhuman Primate , 2004, Science.
[38] E. H. Haimoff,et al. Loud Calls of the Gibbon (Hylobates Lar): Repertoire, Organisation and Context , 1984 .
[39] S. Malaivijitnond,et al. An analysis of white-handed gibbon male song reveals speech-like phrases. , 2018, American journal of physical anthropology.
[40] Kazuo Okanoya,et al. Intergroup and intragroup antiphonal songs in wild male Mueller’s gibbons (Hylobates muelleri) , 2013 .
[41] K. Zuberbühler,et al. Campbell's monkeys concatenate vocalizations into context-specific call sequences , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[42] J G Robinson,et al. An analysis of the organization of vocal communication in the titi monkey Callicebus moloch. , 2010, Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie.
[43] Angela D. Friederici,et al. Artificial grammar learning meets formal language theory: an overview , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[44] Harry van der Hulst,et al. 10. Was recursion the key step in the evolution of the human language faculty , 2010 .
[45] Noam Chomsky,et al. The mystery of language evolution , 2014, Front. Psychol..
[46] R. Berwick,et al. Songs to syntax: the linguistics of birdsong , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[47] S. Pinker,et al. The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky) , 2005, Cognition.