Student sensemaking with science diagrams in a computer-based setting

This paper reports on a study of students’ conceptual sensemaking with science diagrams within a computer-based learning environment aimed at supporting collaborative learning. Through the microanalysis of students’ interactions in a project about energy and heat transfer, we demonstrate how representations become productive social and cognitive resources in the students’ conceptual sensemaking. Taking a socio-cultural approach, the study aims to contribute on two levels. First, by providing insight into the interactional processes in which students encounter a particular type of representation: science diagrams. Second, the study aims to demonstrate that an important aspect of students’ encounters with science representations concerns making sense of how to respond to institutional norms and social practices embedded within the context of schooling. The findings demonstrate how the science diagrams become productive social and individual resources for the students by slowing down the students’ conceptual sensemaking processes and by opening up a space for the interpretation and negotiation of scientific concepts, as well as of the representations themselves. The study also shows the challenges involved when students move from oral to written accounts in their inquiries.

[1]  Hans Spada,et al.  The Active Integration of Information during Learning with Dynamic and Interactive Visualisations , 2004 .

[2]  C. E. Wieman,et al.  A research-based curriculum for teaching the photoelectric effect , 2007, 0706.2165.

[3]  R. A. Engle,et al.  Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive Disciplinary Engagement: Explaining an Emergent Argument in a Community of Learners Classroom , 2002 .

[4]  S. Engel Thought and Language , 1964 .

[5]  Sten R. Ludvigsen,et al.  Analyzing students' interaction with a 3D geometry learning tool and their teacher , 2012 .

[6]  Gerry Stahl,et al.  Studying Virtual Math Teams , 2010 .

[7]  Åsa Mäkitalo,et al.  Accounting Practices as Situated Knowing: Dilemmas and Dynamics in Institutional Categorization , 2003 .

[8]  Per Linell,et al.  Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives , 1998 .

[9]  A. diSessa Metarepresentation: Native Competence and Targets for Instruction , 2004 .

[10]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Effects of Representational Guidance on Collaborative Learning Processes , 2003 .

[11]  George Psathas,et al.  Talk and Social Structure , 1995 .

[12]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice , 1995 .

[13]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Scaffolds for computer simulation based scientific discovery learning , 2006 .

[14]  Huey Gene Copeland,et al.  The Blackness of Blackness , 2008 .

[15]  Jan Wyndhamn,et al.  Heavenly Talk: Discourse, Artifacts, and Children’s Understanding of Elementary Astronomy , 2001, Human Development.

[16]  Philip Bell,et al.  Inquiry and Technology , 2013 .

[17]  Sten R. Ludvigsen,et al.  Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: Basic Concepts, Multiple Perspectives, and Emerging Trends , 2010 .

[18]  T. Jong,et al.  Supporting students' learning with multiple representations in a dynamic simulation-based learning environment , 2006 .

[19]  Baohui Zhang,et al.  Learning the physics of electricity: A qualitative analysis of collaborative processes involved in productive failure , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[20]  E. Aronson The Jigsaw Classroom , 1978 .

[21]  M. Cole Cultural psychology: a once and future discipline? , 1996, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[22]  Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al.  Inscriptions: Toward a Theory of Representing as Social Practice , 1998 .

[23]  Tina Seufert Supporting Coherence Formation in Learning from Multiple Representations , 2003 .

[24]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Distributed by Design: On the Promises and Pitfalls of Collaborative Learning with Multiple Representations , 2011 .

[25]  Richard Lehrer,et al.  Images of learning, images of progress , 2009 .

[26]  Sten R. Ludvigsen,et al.  What does it mean? Students’ procedural and conceptual problem solving in a CSCL environment designed within the field of science education , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[27]  J. Wertsch Mind as action , 1998 .

[28]  Elinor Ochs,et al.  Interpretive Journeys: How Physicists Talk and Travel through Graphic Space , 1994 .

[29]  Gerry Stahl,et al.  Group Cognition: Computer Support for Building Collaborative Knowledge (Acting with Technology) , 2006 .

[30]  Baruch B. Schwarz,et al.  Perspective taking and synchronous argumentation for learning the day/night cycle , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[31]  Anders Kluge,et al.  Simulation as Science Discovery: Ways of Interactive Meaning-Making , 2010, Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn..

[32]  Murat Perit Çakir The Organization of Graphical, Narrative and Symbolic Interactions , 2009 .

[33]  T. Husén,et al.  The International Encyclopedia of Education , 1994 .

[34]  G. Salomon Distributed cognitions : psychological and educational considerations , 1997 .

[35]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  The Emergence of Abstract Representations in Dyad Problem Solving , 1995 .

[36]  Neil Mercer,et al.  Sociocultural discourse analysis: analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking , 2007 .

[37]  J. Greeno,et al.  Practicing Representation: Learning with and about Representational Forms , 1997 .

[38]  A. Giddens Central Problems In Social Theory , 1979 .

[39]  S. Ainsworth DeFT: A Conceptual Framework for Considering Learning with Multiple Representations. , 2006 .

[40]  C. Jung THE COLLECTED WORKS OF , 2014 .

[41]  Shaaron Ainsworth,et al.  The functions of multiple representations , 1999, Comput. Educ..

[42]  M. Chi,et al.  The Nature of Expertise , 1988 .

[43]  Göran Karlsson,et al.  Animation and grammar in science education: Learners’ construal of animated educational software , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[44]  Hans Christian Arnseth,et al.  Reconsidering conceptual change from a socio-cultural perspective: analyzing students’ meaning making in genetics in collaborative learning activities , 2009 .

[45]  Lauren B. Resnick,et al.  Discourse, Tools and Reasoning , 1997 .

[46]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Consistent practices in artifact-mediated collaboration , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[47]  Charles J. De Leone,et al.  Toward Understanding Student Conceptions of the Photoelectric Effect , 2004 .

[48]  R. Kozma The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding , 2003 .

[49]  Anniken Furberg Socio-cultural aspects of prompting student reflection in Web-based inquiry learning environments , 2009, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[50]  Instruction,et al.  Learning, culture and social interaction , 2012 .

[51]  D. Silverman Doing Qualitative Research , 2009 .

[52]  Roger Säljö,et al.  Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning , 2010, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[53]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987 .

[54]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Internet Environments for Science Education , 2004 .

[55]  S. Ludvigsen,et al.  Learning Across Sites : New Tools, Infrastructures and Practices , 2010 .

[56]  Charles Goodwin,et al.  The Blackness of Black: Color Categories as Situated Practice , 1997 .

[57]  J. Roschelle Designing for cognitive communication: epistemic fidelity or mediating collaborative inquiry? , 1997, Computers, Communication and Mental Models.

[58]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  A Scaffolding Design Framework for Software to Support Science Inquiry , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[59]  A. Giddens Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis , 1979 .

[60]  Karen Littleton,et al.  International Handbook of Psychology in Education , 2010 .

[61]  Barbara Wasson,et al.  Using scenarios to design complex technology-enhanced learning environments , 2012 .

[62]  Noel Enyedy Inventing Mapping: Creating Cultural Forms to Solve Collective Problems , 2005 .

[63]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Representational Practices in VMT , 2009 .

[64]  J. Wertsch Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action , 1992 .

[65]  J. Lave Cognition in practice , 1988 .

[66]  Anniken Furberg,et al.  Students' Meaning‐making of Socio‐scientific Issues in Computer Mediated Settings: Exploring learning through interaction trajectories , 2008 .

[67]  L. Vygotsky,et al.  The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Vol. 1: Problems of general psychology. , 1987 .

[68]  J. Lemke Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values , 1990 .

[69]  Walter M. Stroup,et al.  The Power of Mediating Artifacts in Group-Level Development of Mathematical Discourses , 2009 .