Energy-guided learning approach to compressive FD-OCT.

High quality, large size volumetric imaging of biological tissue with optical coherence tomography (OCT) requires large number and high density of scans, which results in large data acquisition volume. This may lead to corruption of the data with motion artifacts related to natural motion of biological tissue, and could potentially cause conflicts with the maximum permissible exposure of biological tissue to optical radiation. Therefore, OCT can benefit greatly from different approaches to sparse or compressive sampling of the data where the signal is recovered from its sub-Nyquist measurements. In this paper, a new energy-guided compressive sensing approach is proposed for improving the quality of images acquired with Fourier domain OCT (FD-OCT) and reconstructed from sparse data sets. The proposed algorithm learns an optimized sampling probability density function based on the energy distribution of the training data set, which is then used for sparse sampling instead of the commonly used uniformly random sampling. It was demonstrated that the proposed energy-guided learning approach to compressive FD-OCT of retina images requires 45% fewer samples in comparison with the conventional uniform compressive sensing (CS) approach while achieving similar reconstruction performance. This novel approach to sparse sampling has the potential to significantly reduce data acquisition while maintaining image quality.

[1]  Dexi Zhu,et al.  Ultra-high resolution optical coherence tomography for imaging the anterior segment of the eye. , 2011, Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging : the official journal of the International Society for Imaging in the Eye.

[2]  David A. Clausi,et al.  Sparse Reconstruction of Breast MRI Using Homotopic $L_0$ Minimization in a Regional Sparsified Domain , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Rémi Gribonval,et al.  Sparse representations in unions of bases , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[4]  David A. Clausi,et al.  Saliency-guided compressive sensing approach to efficient laser range measurement , 2013, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[5]  R. DeVore,et al.  A Simple Proof of the Restricted Isometry Property for Random Matrices , 2008 .

[6]  W Drexler,et al.  Ultrahigh resolution Fourier domain optical coherence tomography. , 2004, Optics express.

[7]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Near-Optimal Signal Recovery From Random Projections: Universal Encoding Strategies? , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[8]  Steve M. Potter,et al.  High-speed CCD movie camera with random pixel selection for neurobiology research , 1997, Other Conferences.

[9]  Jin U Kang,et al.  Sparse OCT: optimizing compressed sensing in spectral domain optical coherence tomography , 2011, BiOS.

[10]  Alexander Wong,et al.  Compressive fluorescence microscopy using saliency-guided sparse reconstruction ensemble fusion. , 2012, Optics express.

[11]  S. Mendelson,et al.  Uniform Uncertainty Principle for Bernoulli and Subgaussian Ensembles , 2006, math/0608665.

[12]  Pierre Vandergheynst,et al.  On Variable Density Compressive Sampling , 2011, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[13]  D. Donoho,et al.  Counting faces of randomly-projected polytopes when the projection radically lowers dimension , 2006, math/0607364.

[14]  Paul Hasler,et al.  Compressive Sensing on a CMOS Separable-Transform Image Sensor , 2010, Proc. IEEE.

[15]  Guy Gilboa,et al.  Nonlocal Operators with Applications to Image Processing , 2008, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[16]  Balas K. Natarajan,et al.  Sparse Approximate Solutions to Linear Systems , 1995, SIAM J. Comput..

[17]  U. Schmidt-Erfurth,et al.  Retinal optical coherence tomography: past, present and future perspectives , 2010, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[18]  E. Candès The restricted isometry property and its implications for compressed sensing , 2008 .

[19]  Yifan Jian,et al.  Real-time high-speed volumetric imaging using compressive sampling optical coherence tomography , 2011, Biomedical optics express.

[20]  D. Hubel,et al.  The role of fixational eye movements in visual perception , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[21]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Optical Coherence Tomography , 1991 .

[22]  R. Huber,et al.  Megahertz OCT for ultrawide-field retinal imaging with a 1050 nm Fourier domain mode-locked laser. , 2011, Optics express.

[23]  Bart Dierickx,et al.  Random addressable active pixel image sensors , 1996, Advanced Imaging and Network Technologies.

[24]  Aswin C. Sankaranarayanan,et al.  Compressive Sensing , 2008, Computer Vision, A Reference Guide.

[25]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Just relax: convex programming methods for identifying sparse signals in noise , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[26]  Michael Elad,et al.  A generalized uncertainty principle and sparse representation in pairs of bases , 2002, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[27]  Dong Liang,et al.  SENSE reconstruction with nonlocal TV regularization , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[28]  E. Candès,et al.  Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements , 2005, math/0503066.

[29]  D. Donoho,et al.  Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  Armando Manduca,et al.  Highly Undersampled Magnetic Resonance Image Reconstruction via Homotopic $\ell_{0}$ -Minimization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[31]  Alexander Wong,et al.  Homotopic, non-local sparse reconstruction of optical coherence tomography imagery. , 2012, Optics express.

[32]  Changhuei Yang,et al.  Sensitivity advantage of swept source and Fourier domain optical coherence tomography. , 2003, Optics express.

[33]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[34]  E. Candès,et al.  Sparsity and incoherence in compressive sampling , 2006, math/0611957.

[35]  Zhao Ren,et al.  High-speed, high-resolution Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography system for retinal imaging in the 1060 nm wavelength region. , 2008, Optics letters.

[36]  Hiroshi Ishikawa,et al.  Optical coherence tomography: history, current status, and laboratory work. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[37]  Zhongmin Wang,et al.  Variable density compressed image sampling , 2009, 2009 17th European Signal Processing Conference.

[38]  Weihong Guo,et al.  Adaptive total variation based filtering for MRI images with spatially inhomogeneous noise and artifacts , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[39]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Structured Compressed Sensing: From Theory to Applications , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[40]  Jin U. Kang,et al.  Compressive SD-OCT: the application of compressed sensing in spectral domain optical coherence tomography , 2010, Optics express.

[41]  Steve P. Monacos,et al.  Design of an event-driven random-access-windowing CCD-based camera , 2003, SPIE LASE.

[42]  Mirza Faisal Beg,et al.  Quantitative Evaluation of Transform Domains for Compressive Sampling-Based Recovery of Sparsely Sampled Volumetric OCT Images , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[43]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Greed is good: algorithmic results for sparse approximation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[44]  Bahaa E. A. Saleh,et al.  Compressed sensing in optical coherence tomography , 2010, BiOS.

[45]  M. Rudelson,et al.  Sparse reconstruction by convex relaxation: Fourier and Gaussian measurements , 2006, 2006 40th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems.

[46]  Xiaoming Huo,et al.  Uncertainty principles and ideal atomic decomposition , 2001, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.