Underestimation of visual texture slant by human observers: a model

The perspective image of an obliquely inclined textured surface exhibits shape and density distortions of texture elements which allow a human observer to estimate the inclination angle of the surface. However, it has been known since the work of Gibson (1950) that, in the absence of other cues, humans tend to underestimate the slant angle of the surface, particularly when the texture is perceived as being “irregular.” The perspective distortions which affect texture elements also shift the projected spatial frequencies of the texture in systematic ways. Using a suitable local spectral filter to measure these frequency gradients, the inclination angle of the surface may be estimated. A computational model has been developed which performs this task using distributions of outputs from filters found to be a good description of simple-cell receptive fields. However, for “irregular” textures the filter output distributions are more like those of “regular” textures at shallower angles of slant, leading the computational algorithm to underestimate the slant angle. This behavioral similarity between human and algorithm suggests the possibility that a similar visual computation is performed in cortex.

[1]  J. Gibson The perception of visual surfaces. , 1950, The American journal of psychology.

[2]  J. Gibson,et al.  The perceived slant of visual surfaces-optical and geographical. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  W. Clark,et al.  The interaction of surface texture, outline gradient, and ground in the perception of slant. , 1956, Canadian journal of psychology.

[4]  H. Gruber,et al.  Perception of Slanted Surfaces , 1956 .

[5]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  R. Erickson,et al.  SENSORY NEURAL PATTERNS AND GUSTATION , 1963 .

[8]  H. Flock,et al.  Variables of Surface Texture and Accuracy of Space Perceptions , 1964, Perceptual and motor skills.

[9]  W. Epstein,et al.  EXAMINATION OF GIBSON'S PSYCHOPHYSICAL HYPOTHESIS. , 1964, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  Phil Brodatz,et al.  Textures: A Photographic Album for Artists and Designers , 1966 .

[11]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  M. Braunstein Motion and texture as sources of slant information. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  J. Robson,et al.  Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  Ruzena Bajcsy,et al.  Texture gradient as a depth cue , 1976 .

[15]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[16]  J. Daugman Two-dimensional spectral analysis of cortical receptive field profiles , 1980, Vision Research.

[17]  J. Perrone Slant Underestimation: A Model Based on the Size of the Viewing Aperture , 1980, Perception.

[18]  S Marcelja,et al.  Mathematical description of the responses of simple cortical cells. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[19]  D. M. MacKay,et al.  Strife over visual cortical function , 1981, Nature.

[20]  J. Daugman Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency, and orientation optimized by two-dimensional visual cortical filters. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[21]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[22]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[23]  J. Hopfield,et al.  Computing with neural circuits: a model. , 1986, Science.

[24]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[25]  J. P. Jones,et al.  An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  J. P. Jones,et al.  The two-dimensional spatial structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  J. P. Jones,et al.  The two-dimensional spectral structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  H. Bourgeois,et al.  [Contrast sensitivity]. , 1987, L'Annee therapeutique et clinique en ophtalmologie.

[29]  Ruzena Bajcsy,et al.  Receptive Fields for the Determination of Textured Surface Inclination , 1989 .

[30]  M. R. Turner,et al.  Estimation of Textured Surface Inclination by Parallel Local Spectral Analysis , 1989 .

[31]  Eric L. Schwartz,et al.  Computational Neuroscience , 1993, Neuromethods.

[32]  Kent A. Stevens,et al.  Slant-tilt: The visual encoding of surface orientation , 1983, Biological Cybernetics.

[33]  M. R. Turner,et al.  Texture discrimination by Gabor functions , 1986, Biological Cybernetics.

[34]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Theory of spatial position and spatial frequency relations in the receptive fields of simple cells in the visual cortex , 1982, Biological Cybernetics.