Neocortical efferent neurons with very slowly conducting axons: strategies for reliable antidromic identification

Although simple in concept, reliable antidromic identification of efferent populations poses numerous technical challenges and is subject to a host of sampling biases, most of which select against the detection of the neurons with slowly conducting axons. This problem is particularly acute in studies of the neocortex. Many neocortical efferent systems have large sub-populations with very slowly conducting, nonmyelinated axons and these elements have been relatively neglected in antidromic studies of neocortical neurons. The present review attempts to redress this problem by analyzing the steps that must necessarily precede antidromic identification and the sampling biases associated with each of these steps. These steps include (1) initial recognition that the microelectrode is near a neuron; (2) activation of the efferent axon via the stimulating electrode; (3) conduction of the antidromic impulse from stimulation site to soma; (4) detection of the antidromic spike in the extracellular record and (5) discriminating antidromic from synaptic activation. Experimental strategies are suggested for minimizing the sampling biases associated with each of these steps; most of which can be reduced or eliminated by appropriate experimental procedures. Careful attention to such procedures will make it possible to better understand the nature and function of the information flow along the very slowly conducting axonal systems of the neocortex.

[1]  H. Swadlow,et al.  Efferent neurons and suspected interneurons in second somatosensory cortex of the awake rabbit: receptive fields and axonal properties. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  S G Waxman,et al.  Small-diameter nonmyelinated axons in the primate corpus callosum. , 1980, Archives of neurology.

[3]  H. Swadlow Efferent neurons and suspected interneurons in S-1 vibrissa cortex of the awake rabbit: receptive fields and axonal properties. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  P. Rudomín,et al.  PERIPHERAL RECEPTIVE FIELDS OF NEURONS IN THE CAT'S CEREBRAL CORTEX , 1961 .

[5]  J. Eccles,et al.  The ventro‐basal complex of the thalamus: types of cells, their responses and their functional organization , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  R. Dykes,et al.  An electrophysiological study of single somatosensory neurons in rat granular cortex serving the limbs: a laminar analysis. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  M. Mayer,et al.  Electrophysiological analysis of pathways connecting the medial preoptic area with the mesencephalic central grey matter in rats. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  H. Swadlow Physiological properties of individual cerebral axons studied in vivo for as long as one year. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Gary Aston-Jones,et al.  Brain aminergic axons exhibit marked variability in conduction velocity , 1980, Brain Research.

[10]  M. Wiesendanger Input from muscle and cutaneous nerves of the hand and forearm to neurones of the precentral gyrus of baboons and monkeys , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  H. Swadlow Monitoring the excitability of neocortical efferent neurons to direct activation by extracellular current pulses. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  B L Finlay,et al.  Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. IV. Corticotectal cells. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Stephen G. Waxman,et al.  Ultrastructure of visual callosal axons in the rabbit , 1976, Experimental Neurology.

[14]  J. Lettvin,et al.  Multiple meaning in single visual units. , 1970, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[15]  M. Berry,et al.  Ontogeny of interhemispheric evoked potentials in the rat: significance of myelination of the corpus callosum. , 1972, Experimental neurology.

[16]  H. Swadlow,et al.  Modulation of impulse conduction along the axonal tree. , 1980, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[17]  A L Towe,et al.  Extracellular microelectrode sampling bias. , 1970, Experimental neurology.

[18]  J TOMASCH,et al.  Size, distribution, and number of fibres in the human Corpus Callosum , 1954, The Anatomical record.

[19]  J. B. Ranck,et al.  Chapter 1 – Extracellular Stimulation , 1981 .

[20]  Patrice Y. Simard,et al.  Time is of the essence: a conjecture that hemispheric specialization arises from interhemispheric conduction delay. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  Jean Bullier,et al.  Spread of stimulating current in the cortical grey matter of rat visual cortex studied on a new in vitro slice preparation , 1996, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[22]  H. Asanuma,et al.  Relationship between afferent input and motor outflow in cat motorsensory cortex. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  J. B. Ranck,et al.  Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: A review , 1975, Brain Research.

[24]  J G Malpeli,et al.  Cat area 17. IV. Two types of corticotectal cells defined by controlling geniculate inputs. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  E. Jankowska,et al.  An electrophysiological demonstration of the axonal projections of single spinal interneurones in the cat , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  P. Zarzecki Influence of somatosensory cortex on different classes of cat motor cortex output neuron. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  W. Burke,et al.  The identification of single units in central visual pathways , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  D. C. West,et al.  Strength‐duration characteristics of myelinated and non‐myelinated bulbospinal axons in the cat spinal cord. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  Stephen G. Waxman,et al.  Physiology and Pathobiology of Axons , 1979 .

[30]  L. Kubin,et al.  The medullary projections of afferent bronchopulmonary C fibres in the cat as shown by antidromic mapping. , 1991, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  H. Swadlow Efferent neurons and suspected interneurons in motor cortex of the awake rabbit: axonal properties, sensory receptive fields, and subthreshold synaptic inputs. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  A. Towe,et al.  RESPONSE PROPERTIES OF NEURONS IN THE PERICRUCIATE CORTEX OF THE CAT FOLLOWING ELECTRICAL STIMULATION OF THE APPENDAGES. , 1964, Experimental neurology.

[33]  R. Willison,et al.  The refractory and supernormal periods of the human median nerve , 1963, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[34]  M. Bennett,et al.  Relative conduction velocities of small myelinated and non-myelinated fibres in the central nervous system. , 1972, Nature: New biology.

[35]  C. G. Phillips,et al.  Responses of mitral cells to stimulation of the lateral olfactory tract in the rabbit , 1963, The Journal of physiology.

[36]  H. Swadlow Efferent neurons and suspected interneurons in S-1 forelimb representation of the awake rabbit: receptive fields and axonal properties. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  H. Fields,et al.  Relations among threshold, spike height, electrode distance, and conduction velocity in electrical stimulation of certain medullospinal neurons. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  Raymond P. Kesner,et al.  Electrical stimulation research techniques , 1981 .

[39]  H. Swadlow,et al.  Variations in conduction velocity and excitability following single and multiple impulses of visual callosal axons in the rabbit , 1976, Experimental Neurology.

[40]  E Jankowska,et al.  The mode of activation of pyramidal tract cells by intracortical stimuli. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[41]  L. R. Carley,et al.  Comparison of the after‐effects of impulse conduction on threshold at nodes of Ranvier along single frog sciatic axons. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[42]  H. Swadlow Antidromic activation: Measuring the refractory period at the site of axonal stimulation , 1982, Experimental Neurology.

[43]  D. Ferster,et al.  An intracellular analysis of geniculo‐cortical connectivity in area 17 of the cat. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[44]  A. Harvey A physiological analysis of subcortical and commissural projections of areas 17 and 18 of the cat. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[45]  J. Eccles,et al.  Intracellular recording from antidromically activated motoneurones , 1953, The Journal of physiology.

[46]  T. Tsumoto,et al.  Three groups of cortico‐geniculate neurons and their distribution in binocular and monocular segments of cat striate cortex , 1980, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[47]  H. Swadlow Efferent neurons and suspected interneurons in binocular visual cortex of the awake rabbit: receptive fields and binocular properties. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  P. Rakić,et al.  Cytological and quantitative characteristics of four cerebral commissures in the rhesus monkey , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[49]  L. Palmer,et al.  Visual receptive fields of single striate corical units projecting to the superior colliculus in the cat. , 1974, Brain research.

[50]  J. Lipski,et al.  Antidromic activation of neurones as an analytic tool in the study of the central nervous system , 1981, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[51]  R. Lemon,et al.  Variety of functional organization within the monkey motor cortex , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[52]  W. Levick,et al.  Selectivity of microelectrodes in recordings from cat retinal ganglion cells. , 1974, Journal of neurophysiology.

[53]  A. Selverston,et al.  Antidromic Action Potentials Fail to Demonstrate Known Interactions between Neurons , 1972, Science.

[54]  Innocenti Gm,et al.  The primary visual pathway through the corpus callosum: morphological and functional aspects in the cat , 1980 .

[55]  A L Pearlman,et al.  Does laminar position determine the receptive field properties of cortical neurons? A study of corticotectal cells in area 17 of the normal mouse and the reeler mutant , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[56]  R. Dykes,et al.  Neurons without demonstrable receptive fields outnumber neurons having receptive fields in samples from the somatosensory cortex of anesthetized or paralyzed cats and rats , 1988, Brain Research.

[57]  S. A. Raymond,et al.  Changes in axonal impulse conduction correlate with sensory modality in primary afferent fibers in the rat , 1990, Brain Research.

[58]  J. Schlag,et al.  Determination of antidromic excitation by the collision test: Problems of interpretation , 1976, Brain Research.

[59]  S. A. Raymond Effects of nerve impulses on threshold of frog sciatic nerve fibres. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[60]  Cat area 17. III. Response properties and orientation anisotropies of corticotectal cells. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[61]  G Oakson,et al.  Inhibitory processes and interneuronal apparatus in motor cortex during sleep and waking. I. Background firing and responsiveness of pyramidal tract neurons and interneurons. , 1974, Journal of neurophysiology.

[62]  J. Stone,et al.  Sampling properties of microelectrodes assessed in the cat's retina. , 1973, Journal of neurophysiology.