Autonomous multi satellites assembly in keplerian orbits

In this paper, the guidance and control algorithms of an autonomous multiple satellite assembly are developed in a general keplerian orbit. The guidance algorithms are based on defining the velocity profile of each satellite in two different segment of space. In the first segment, the guidance law utilizes the analytical closed form solution of the satellite relative motion in close proximity in which the gravitational forces are considered. To avoid the singularity associated with the analytical solution, switching to the second segment of space is introduced to redefine the velocity profile as a function of the relative distance between satellites and relative distance to the desired goal location in the assembly. The guidance algorithms suggest attraction and repulsion forces between the individuals in which the attraction forces dominate on large distances while repulsion forces dominate on close distances. The Proportional-Derivative (PD) continuous feedback control and the velocity change Δv control algorithms are presented to perform efficient fuel consumption maneuver, while avoiding collisions and to track the guidance trajectories. Numerical simulations are performed to assess the precision of these algorithms in hexagonal and cubic formation assembly.

[1]  S. Vadali,et al.  Relative Motion and the Geometry of Formations in Keplerian Elliptic Orbits with Arbitrary Eccentricity , 2007 .

[2]  Xiaoping Yun,et al.  Autonomous Distributed Control of Simultaneous Multiple Spacecraft Proximity Maneuvers , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[3]  W. H. Clohessy,et al.  Terminal Guidance System for Satellite Rendezvous , 2012 .

[4]  Kevin M. Passino,et al.  Stability analysis of swarms , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[5]  Xiaoping Yun,et al.  Autonomous Distributed Control Algorithm for Multiple Spacecraft in Close Proximity Operations , 2007 .

[6]  T. Carter State Transition Matrices for Terminal Rendezvous Studies: Brief Survey and New Example , 1998 .

[7]  Frank McQuade Autonomous control for on-orbit assembly using artificial potential functions , 1997 .

[8]  J. How,et al.  Relative Dynamics and Control of Spacecraft Formations in Eccentric Orbits , 2000 .

[9]  K. Yamanaka,et al.  New State Transition Matrix for Relative Motion on an Arbitrary Elliptical Orbit , 2002 .

[10]  Swati Mohan Quantative [sic] selection and design of model generation architectures for on-orbit autonomous assembly , 2010 .

[11]  David J. Richie,et al.  Satellite formation flying: Robust algorithms for propulsion, path planning and control , 2009, 2009 European Control Conference (ECC).

[12]  C. McInnes,et al.  Autonomous rendezvous using artificial potential function guidance , 1995 .

[13]  Veysel Gazi,et al.  Swarm aggregations using artificial potentials and sliding-mode control , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[14]  Riccardo Bevilacqua,et al.  Development and experimentation of LQR/APF guidance and control for autonomous proximity maneuvers of multiple spacecraft , 2011 .

[15]  Shawn B. McCamish,et al.  Distributed autonomous control of multiple spacecraft during close proximity operations , 2007 .

[16]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  Real-Time Obstacle Avoidance for Manipulators and Mobile Robots , 1986 .

[17]  Dario Izzo,et al.  Autonomous and Distributed Motion Planning for Satellite Swarm , 2007 .

[18]  K. Passino,et al.  A class of attractions/repulsion functions for stable swarm aggregations , 2004 .

[19]  Mohamed Elsayed Aly Abd Elaziz Okasha,et al.  Guidance, Navigation and Control for Satellite Proximity Operations using Tschauner-Hempel Equations , 2011 .