The Learners' Attitudes towards Using Different Learning Methods in E-Learning Portal Environment

This study investigates the learnersâ?? preference of academic, collaborative and social interaction towards interaction methods in e-learning portal. Academic interaction consists of interaction between learners and online learning resources such as online reading, online explanation, online examination and also online question answering. Collaborative interaction occurs when learners interact among themselves using online group discussion. Social interaction happens when learners and instructors participate in the session either via online text chatting or voice chatting. The study employed qualitative methodology where data were collected through questionnaire that was administered to 933 distance education students from Bachelor of Management, Bachelor of Science, Bachelor of Social Science and Bachelor of Art. The survey responses were tabulated in a 5-point Likert scale and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) Version 12.0 based on frequency and percentage distribution. The result of the study suggest that among three types of interaction, most of the student prefer academic interaction for their learning supports in e-learning portal compared to collaborative and social interaction. They wish to interact with learning content rather than interact with people. They prefer to read and learn from the resources rather than sharing knowledge among themselves and instructors via collaborative and social interaction.

[1]  M. J. W. Thomas,et al.  Learning within incoherent structures: the space of online discussion forums , 2002, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[2]  David Geerts.  Comparing voice chat and text chat in a communication tool for interactive television , 2006, NordiCHI '06.

[3]  Tzu-Chien Liu,et al.  Applying wireless technologies to build a highly interactive learning environment , 2002, Proceedings. IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education.

[4]  A. S. Guha,et al.  E‐learning: the latest spectrum in open and distance learning , 2008 .

[5]  Brent Muirhead,et al.  Enhancing Social Interaction in Computer-Mediated Distance Education , 2000, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[6]  Fatos Xhafa,et al.  Thread-based analysis of patterns of collaborative interaction in chat , 2005, AIED.

[7]  Michael Bieber,et al.  Traditional In-class Examination vs. Collaborative Online Examination in Asynchronous Learning Networks: Field Evaluation Results , 2004, AMCIS.

[8]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  The Mere Belief of Social Interaction Improves Learning , 2007 .

[9]  Bill Anderson,et al.  Dimensions of learning and support in an online community , 2004 .

[10]  Jr. Donald J. Leu.  The New Literacies: Research on Reading Instruction With the Internet , 2002 .

[11]  Neil J. Anderson.  SCROLLING, CLICKING, AND READING ENGLISH: ONLINE READING STRATEGIES IN A SECOND/FOREIGN LANGUAGE , 2003 .

[12]  Rich Gazan.  Specialists and synthesists in a question answering community , 2006, ASIST.

[13]  Julie Coiro.  Reading comprehension on the Internet: Expanding our understanding of reading comprehension to encompass new literacies , 2003 .

[14]  Brendan Tangney,et al.  Using short message service to encourage interactivity in the classroom , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[15]  D. Keegan,et al.  Three Types of Interaction , 2013 .