Damaged Durable Goods

A durable-goods monopolist may use quality degradation as a commitment not to lower price in the future. The introduction of damaged goods expedites lowvaluation consumers? future demands, and helps the firm to mitigate the Coasian time-consistency problem. In such a case, damaged goods are more likely to be observed relative to the static setting where only the price-discrimination aspect of quality degradation is in effect. However, it is more likely to reduce welfare by inducing low-valuation buyers to buy the low-quality good early rather than to wait and buy the high-quality good later. So, quality degradation of durable goods is more likely to occur but less promising to the society, relative to the case of nondurable goods where damaged goods are rarely observed but more likely to be Paretoimproving.

[1]  In Ho Lee,et al.  A Theory of Economic Obsolescence , 2003 .

[2]  M. Bagnoli,et al.  Intertemporal self-selection with multiple buyers , 1995 .

[3]  Drew Fudenberg,et al.  Upgrades, Tradeins, and Buybacks , 1998 .

[4]  Stephen W. Salant,et al.  Durable-Goods Monopoly with Discrete Demand , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  J. Sobel,et al.  A Multistage Model of Bargaining , 1983 .

[6]  Gyu Ho Wang,et al.  Bargaining over a Menu of Wage Contracts , 1998 .

[7]  Kai-Uwe Kühn,et al.  Coase versus Pacman: Who Eats Whom in the Durable-Goods Monopoly? , 1995, Journal of Political Economy.

[8]  A. Jorge Padilla,et al.  Product Line Decisions and the Coase Conjecture , 1996 .

[9]  Jay Pil Choi,et al.  Network Externality, Compatibility Choice, and Planned Obsolescence , 1994 .

[10]  S. Rosen,et al.  Monopoly and product quality , 1978 .

[11]  Jong-Hee Hahn,et al.  The welfare effect of quality degradation in the presence of network externalities , 2003, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[12]  R. Coase Durability and Monopoly , 1972, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[13]  Michael Waldman,et al.  A New Perspective on Planned Obsolescence , 1993 .

[14]  Lawrence M. Ausubel,et al.  Bargaining in Incomplete Information , 2002 .

[15]  Drew Fudenberg,et al.  The neo-Luddite's lament: excessive upgrades in the software industry , 2000 .

[16]  Lisa N. Takeyama Strategic Vertical Differentiation and Durable Goods Monopoly , 2002 .

[17]  Joel Sobel,et al.  A Multi-stage Model of Bargaining , 1983 .

[18]  O. Hart Bargaining and Strikes , 1989 .

[19]  Jeremy I. Bulow An Economic Theory of Planned Obsolescence , 1986 .

[20]  A. Roth Game-Theoretic Models of Bargaining , 1987 .

[21]  Robert B. Wilson,et al.  Foundations of Dynamic Monopoly and the Coase Conjecture , 1986 .

[22]  Lawrence M. Ausubel,et al.  REPUTATION IN BARGAINING AND DURABLE GOODS MONOPOLY , 1989 .

[23]  Roman Inderst,et al.  Durable Goods with Quality Differentiation , 2003 .

[24]  Nancy L. Stokey Rational Expectations and Durable Goods Pricing , 1981 .

[25]  J. Harsanyi Games with randomly disturbed payoffs: A new rationale for mixed-strategy equilibrium points , 1973 .

[26]  Jeremy I. Bulow Durable-Goods Monopolists , 1982, Journal of Political Economy.

[27]  Nancy L. Stokey Intertemporal Price Discrimination , 1979 .

[28]  I. Png,et al.  Market segmentation, cannibalization, and the timing of product introductions , 1992 .

[29]  David A. Butz,et al.  Durable Good Monopoly and Best-Price Provisions , 1990 .

[30]  Dale A. Stirling,et al.  Information rules , 2003, SGMD.