Reforming China’s fertilizer policies: implications for nitrogen pollution reduction and food security

[1]  M. Wollni,et al.  Does integrated soil fertility management increase returns to land and labor? , 2022, Agricultural Economics.

[2]  Songqing Jin,et al.  Impacts of cooperative membership on rice productivity: Evidence from China , 2022, World Development.

[3]  H. Lotze-Campen,et al.  Food system development pathways for healthy, nature-positive and inclusive food systems , 2021, Nature Food.

[4]  Jinfeng Chang,et al.  Reconciling regional nitrogen boundaries with global food security , 2021, Nature Food.

[5]  A. Bouwman,et al.  Mitigating nitrogen pollution from global croplands with cost-effective measures , 2021 .

[6]  G. Luderer,et al.  A sustainable development pathway for climate action within the UN 2030 Agenda , 2021, Nature Climate Change.

[7]  Xi Lu,et al.  China’s greenhouse gas emissions for cropping systems from 1978–2016 , 2021, Scientific Data.

[8]  W.C.M. van Veen,et al.  Can China's overuse of fertilizer be reduced without threatening food security and farm incomes? , 2021 .

[9]  S. Rolinski,et al.  The ongoing nutrition transition thwarts long-term targets for food security, public health and environmental protection , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[10]  D. Zilberman,et al.  Countries influence the trade-off between crop yields and nitrogen pollution , 2020, Nature Food.

[11]  H. Lotze-Campen,et al.  Beyond land-use intensity: Assessing future global crop productivity growth under different socioeconomic pathways , 2020, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[12]  A. Mamun,et al.  Agricultural subsidies and global greenhouse gas emissions , 2020, Nature Communications.

[13]  Z. Cui,et al.  Outlook of China's agriculture transforming from smallholder operation to sustainable production , 2020 .

[14]  A. Mol,et al.  Decoupling livestock and crop production at the household level in China , 2020, Nature Sustainability.

[15]  B. Czyżewski,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of the common agricultural policy and environmental policy in country districts: Spatial spillovers of pollution, bio-uniformity and green schemes in Poland. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[16]  O. Oenema,et al.  Nitrogen pollution policy beyond the farm , 2019, Nature Food.

[17]  Alexander Popp,et al.  MAgPIE 4 – a modular open-source framework for modeling global land systems , 2019, Geoscientific Model Development.

[18]  Jim W Hall,et al.  Managing nitrogen to restore water quality in China , 2019, Nature.

[19]  H. Lotze-Campen,et al.  MAgPIE 4 – A modular open source framework for modeling global land-systems , 2018 .

[20]  P. Vitousek,et al.  Policy distortions, farm size, and the overuse of agricultural chemicals in China , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Jianliang Huang,et al.  Pursuing sustainable productivity with millions of smallholder farmers , 2018, Nature.

[22]  Peter H. Verburg,et al.  A cross-scale impact assessment of European nature protection policies under contrasting future socio-economic pathways , 2018, Regional Environmental Change.

[23]  D. Chadwick,et al.  Enhanced‐efficiency fertilizers are not a panacea for resolving the nitrogen problem , 2018, Global change biology.

[24]  R. Hu,et al.  Reduction in nitrogen fertilizer use results in increased rice yields and improved environmental protection , 2017 .

[25]  Jeffrey Sayer,et al.  Agriculture production as a major driver of the Earth system exceeding planetary boundaries , 2017 .

[26]  C. Müller,et al.  LPJmL4 – a dynamic global vegetation model with managed land – Part 1: Model description , 2017 .

[27]  Quan Tang,et al.  Can knowledge‐based N management produce more staple grain with lower greenhouse gas emission and reactive nitrogen pollution? A meta‐analysis , 2017, Global change biology.

[28]  X. Ju,et al.  Nitrogen use efficiencies in Chinese agricultural systems and implications for food security and environmental protection , 2017, Regional Environmental Change.

[29]  X. Ju,et al.  Reducing China’s fertilizer use by increasing farm size , 2016 .

[30]  Xiaomin Feng,et al.  Integrated assessment of the impact of enhanced-efficiency nitrogen fertilizer on N2O emission and crop yield , 2016 .

[31]  Matthew E. Kahn,et al.  The consequences of spatially differentiated water pollution regulation in China , 2018 .

[32]  Christoph Schmitz,et al.  Taking account of governance: Implications for land-use dynamics, food prices, and trade patterns , 2016 .

[33]  L. Arata,et al.  The Impact of Agri-environmental Schemes on Farm Performance in Five E.U. Member States: A DID-Matching Approach , 2016, Land Economics.

[34]  E. Davidson,et al.  Managing nitrogen for sustainable development , 2015, Nature.

[35]  P. Dumas,et al.  Evaluating the impact of rising fertilizer prices on crop yields , 2015 .

[36]  Hiroyuki Takeshima,et al.  Fertilizer subsidies, political influence and local food prices in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Nigeria , 2015 .

[37]  P. Vitousek,et al.  Integrated reactive nitrogen budgets and future trends in China , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet , 2015, Science.

[39]  Benjamin Leon Bodirsky,et al.  Land-use protection for climate change mitigation , 2014 .

[40]  C. Müller,et al.  Robust relationship between yields and nitrogen inputs indicates three ways to reduce nitrogen pollution , 2014 .

[41]  J. Garnier,et al.  50 year trends in nitrogen use efficiency of world cropping systems: the relationship between yield and nitrogen input to cropland , 2014 .

[42]  Jianliang Huang,et al.  Producing more grain with lower environmental costs , 2014, Nature.

[43]  Yifei Zhang,et al.  Fertilizer industry subsidies in China: who are the beneficiaries? , 2014 .

[44]  Christoph Schmitz,et al.  Reactive nitrogen requirements to feed the world in 2050 and potential to mitigate nitrogen pollution , 2014, Nature Communications.

[45]  Michael Obersteiner,et al.  Agricultural productivity and greenhouse gas emissions: trade-offs or synergies between mitigation and food security? , 2013 .

[46]  Lin Ma,et al.  An Analysis of China's Fertilizer Policies: Impacts on the Industry, Food Security, and the Environment. , 2013, Journal of environmental quality.

[47]  Ying Zhang,et al.  New technologies reduce greenhouse gas emissions from nitrogenous fertilizer in China , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Christoph Schmitz,et al.  N 2 O emissions from the global agricultural nitrogen cycle – current state and future scenarios , 2012 .

[49]  Christoph Schmitz,et al.  Measuring agricultural land-use intensity -A global analysis using a model-assisted approach , 2012 .

[50]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Solutions for a cultivated planet , 2011, Nature.

[51]  E. Chirwa,et al.  Subsidies and Crowding Out: A Double‐Hurdle Model of Fertilizer Demand in Malawi , 2011 .

[52]  P. Vitousek,et al.  Significant Acidification in Major Chinese Croplands , 2010, Science.

[53]  C. Müller,et al.  Global food demand, productivity growth, and the scarcity of land and water resources: a spatially explicit mathematical programming approach. , 2008 .

[54]  Jikun Huang,et al.  Training programs and in-the-field guidance to reduce China's overuse of fertilizer without hurting profitability , 2008, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[55]  J. Galloway,et al.  Transformation of the Nitrogen Cycle: Recent Trends, Questions, and Potential Solutions , 2008, Science.

[56]  V. Ruttan.  Productivity Growth In World Agriculture: Sources And Constraints , 2002 .

[57]  M. Rosegrant,et al.  Simulating the Impacts of Credit Policy and Fertilizer Subsidy on Central Luzon Rice Farms, the Philippines , 1981 .

[58]  F. DeClerck,et al.  Pathways to sustainable land-use and food systems: 2019 Report of the FABLE Consortium , 2019 .

[59]  M. Nithyashree,et al.  Fertilizer subsidies in India : an insight to distribution and equity issues , 2017 .

[60]  P. Kyle,et al.  Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways , 2017 .

[61]  K. Riahi,et al.  The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century , 2017 .

[62]  C. Müller,et al.  LPJmL4 – a dynamic global vegetation model with managed land: Part I – Model description , 2017 .

[63]  Christoph Schmitz,et al.  Environmental flow provision: Implications for agricultural water and land-use at the global scale , 2015 .

[64]  Christoph Schmitz,et al.  Comparing supply-side specifications in models of global agriculture and the food system , 2014 .

[65]  Christoph Schmitz,et al.  Forecasting technological change in agriculture—An endogenous implementation in a global land use model , 2014 .

[66]  K. Klonsky.  Comparison of Production Costs and Resource Use for Organic and Conventional Production Systems , 2012 .