Sex differences in the structural connectome of the human brain

Significance Sex differences are of high scientific and societal interest because of their prominence in behavior of humans and nonhuman species. This work is highly significant because it studies a very large population of 949 youths (8–22 y, 428 males and 521 females) using the diffusion-based structural connectome of the brain, identifying novel sex differences. The results establish that male brains are optimized for intrahemispheric and female brains for interhemispheric communication. The developmental trajectories of males and females separate at a young age, demonstrating wide differences during adolescence and adulthood. The observations suggest that male brains are structured to facilitate connectivity between perception and coordinated action, whereas female brains are designed to facilitate communication between analytical and intuitive processing modes. Sex differences in human behavior show adaptive complementarity: Males have better motor and spatial abilities, whereas females have superior memory and social cognition skills. Studies also show sex differences in human brains but do not explain this complementarity. In this work, we modeled the structural connectome using diffusion tensor imaging in a sample of 949 youths (aged 8–22 y, 428 males and 521 females) and discovered unique sex differences in brain connectivity during the course of development. Connection-wise statistical analysis, as well as analysis of regional and global network measures, presented a comprehensive description of network characteristics. In all supratentorial regions, males had greater within-hemispheric connectivity, as well as enhanced modularity and transitivity, whereas between-hemispheric connectivity and cross-module participation predominated in females. However, this effect was reversed in the cerebellar connections. Analysis of these changes developmentally demonstrated differences in trajectory between males and females mainly in adolescence and in adulthood. Overall, the results suggest that male brains are structured to facilitate connectivity between perception and coordinated action, whereas female brains are designed to facilitate communication between analytical and intuitive processing modes.

[1]  R. Gorski,et al.  Sex differences in the corpus callosum of the living human being , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[2]  P. Basser,et al.  MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[3]  L. Katz,et al.  Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language , 1995, Nature.

[4]  G Schlaug,et al.  Corpus callosum and brain volume in women and men , 1995, Neuroreport.

[5]  J. Rapoport,et al.  Quantitative MRI of the temporal lobe, amygdala, and hippocampus in normal human development: Ages 4–18 years , 1995, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[6]  P. Basser,et al.  Toward a quantitative assessment of diffusion anisotropy , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  J D Watson,et al.  Nonparametric Analysis of Statistic Images from Functional Mapping Experiments , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[8]  Jagath C. Rajapakse,et al.  Sexual dimorphism of the developing human brain , 1997, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.

[9]  G. Ratcliff,et al.  Sex differences in brain aging: a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study. , 1998, Archives of neurology.

[10]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[11]  A. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis II: Inflation, Flattening, and a Surface-Based Coordinate System , 1999, NeuroImage.

[12]  B. Turetsky,et al.  Sex Differences in Brain Gray and White Matter in Healthy Young Adults: Correlations with Cognitive Performance , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  B. Turetsky,et al.  An fMRI Study of Sex Differences in Regional Activation to a Verbal and a Spatial Task , 2000, Brain and Language.

[14]  J. Townsend,et al.  Normal brain development and aging: quantitative analysis at in vivo MR imaging in healthy volunteers. , 2000, Radiology.

[15]  N. Makris,et al.  Normal sexual dimorphism of the adult human brain assessed by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  D. Le Bihan,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging: Concepts and applications , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  Diffusion‐tensor MRI: theory, experimental design and data analysis – a technical review , 2002 .

[18]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[19]  Hanna Damasio,et al.  Sexual dimorphism and asymmetries in the gray–white composition of the human cerebrum , 2003, NeuroImage.

[20]  René Westerhausen,et al.  The influence of handedness and gender on the microstructure of the human corpus callosum: a diffusion-tensor magnetic resonance imaging study , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[21]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion‐weighted MR imaging , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  Brian Avants,et al.  Characterization of sexual dimorphism in the human corpus callosum , 2003, NeuroImage.

[23]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[24]  K. Cosgrove,et al.  Evolving Knowledge of Sex Differences in Brain Structure, Function, and Chemistry , 2007, Biological Psychiatry.

[25]  Khader M Hasan,et al.  Quantitative diffusion tensor tractography of association and projection fibers in normally developing children and adolescents. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  O. Sporns,et al.  Identification and Classification of Hubs in Brain Networks , 2007, PloS one.

[27]  Lester Melie-García,et al.  Characterizing brain anatomical connections using diffusion weighted MRI and graph theory , 2007, NeuroImage.

[28]  D. Geary,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST The Science of Sex Differences in Science and Mathematics , 2022 .

[29]  C. Hamilton,et al.  Cognition and sex differences , 2008 .

[30]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Hierarchical Organization of Human Cortical Networks in Health and Schizophrenia , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Vincent J Schmithorst,et al.  Developmental differences in white matter architecture between boys and girls , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[32]  Isabelle D. Cherney,et al.  Mapping Out Spatial Ability: Sex Differences in Way-Finding Navigation , 2008, Perceptual and motor skills.

[33]  Lester Melie-García,et al.  Studying the human brain anatomical network via diffusion-weighted MRI and Graph Theory , 2008, NeuroImage.

[34]  O. Sporns,et al.  Mapping the Structural Core of Human Cerebral Cortex , 2008, PLoS biology.

[35]  Jung-Lung Hsu,et al.  Gender differences and age-related white matter changes of the human brain: A diffusion tensor imaging study , 2008, NeuroImage.

[36]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Age- and Gender-Related Differences in the Cortical Anatomical Network , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[38]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Mapping anatomical connectivity patterns of human cerebral cortex using in vivo diffusion tensor imaging tractography. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[39]  Osamu Abe,et al.  Sex dimorphism in gray/white matter volume and diffusion tensor during normal aging , 2010, NMR in biomedicine.

[40]  L. Cahill,et al.  Sex differences in molecular neuroscience: from fruit flies to humans , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[41]  B. Luna,et al.  White matter development in adolescence: a DTI study. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[43]  Christian Beaulieu,et al.  Age-related regional variations of the corpus callosum identified by diffusion tensor tractography , 2010, NeuroImage.

[44]  O. Sporns,et al.  White matter maturation reshapes structural connectivity in the late developing human brain , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Joanna Jacobus,et al.  Sex differences in adolescent white matter architecture , 2011, Brain Research.

[46]  Yong He,et al.  Sex- and brain size-related small-world structural cortical networks in young adults: a DTI tractography study. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[47]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  THE HUMAN CONNECTOME: A COMPLEX NETWORK , 2011, Schizophrenia Research.

[48]  Jonathan D Clayden,et al.  Normative development of white matter tracts: similarities and differences in relation to age, gender, and intelligence. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[49]  Dardo Tomasi,et al.  Gender differences in brain functional connectivity density , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[50]  Bonnie J Nagel,et al.  The impact of sex, puberty, and hormones on white matter microstructure in adolescents. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[51]  N. Volkow,et al.  Laterality patterns of brain functional connectivity: gender effects. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[52]  Rajesh Kumar,et al.  Regional brain axial and radial diffusivity changes during development , 2012, Journal of neuroscience research.

[53]  Sukhwinder S. Shergill,et al.  Gender Differences in White Matter Microstructure , 2012, PloS one.

[54]  Raquel E Gur,et al.  Age group and sex differences in performance on a computerized neurocognitive battery in children age 8-21. , 2012, Neuropsychology.

[55]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Development of brain structural connectivity between ages 12 and 30: A 4-Tesla diffusion imaging study in 439 adolescents and adults , 2013, NeuroImage.