Asymptotics of likelihood ratio derivative estimators in simulations of highly reliable Markovian systems

We discuss the estimation of derivatives of a performance measure using the likelihood ratio method in simulations of highly reliable Markovian systems. We compare the difficulties of estimating the performance measure and of estimating its partial derivatives with respect to component failure rates as the component failure rates tend to 0 and the component repair rates remain fixed. We first consider the case when the quantities are estimated using naive simulation; i.e., when no variance reduction technique is used. In particular, we prove that in the limit, some of the partial derivatives can be estimated as accurately as the performance measure itself. This result is of particular interest in light of the somewhat pessimistic empirical results others have obtained when applying the likelihood ratio method to other types of systems. However, the result only holds for certain partial derivatives of the performance measure when using naive simulation. More specifically, we can estimate a certain partial derivative with the same relative accuracy as the performance measure if the partial derivative is associated with a component either having one of the largest failure rates or whose failure can trigger a failure transition on one of the "most likely paths to failure." Also, we develop a simple criterion to determine which partial derivatives will satisfy either of these properties. In particular, we can identify these derivatives using a sensitivity measure which can be calculated for each type of component. We also examine the limiting behavior of the estimates of the performance measure and its derivatives which are obtained when an importance sampling scheme known as balanced failure biasing is used. In particular, we show that the estimates of all derivatives can be improved. In contrast to the situation that arose when using naive simulation, we prove that in the limit, all derivatives can be estimated as accurately as the performance measure when balanced failure biasing is employed. Finally, we formalize the notion of a "most likely path to failure" in the setting of highly reliable Markovian systems. We accomplish this by proving a conditional limit theorem for the distribution of the sample paths leading to a system failure, given that a system failure occurs before the system returns to the state with all components operational. We use this result to establish our other results.

[1]  W. Rudin Principles of mathematical analysis , 1964 .

[2]  Michael A. Crane,et al.  Simulating Stable Stochastic Systems, II: Markov Chains , 1974, JACM.

[3]  D. Iglehart,et al.  Discrete time methods for simulating continuous time Markov chains , 1976, Advances in Applied Probability.

[4]  P. Billingsley,et al.  Probability and Measure , 1980 .

[5]  J. Keilson Markov Chain Models--Rarity And Exponentiality , 1979 .

[6]  Conditioned limit theorems relating a random walk to its associate, with applications to risk reserve processes and the GI/G/1 queue , 1982, Advances in Applied Probability.

[7]  S. Asmussen Conditioned limit theorems relating a random walk to its associate, with applications to risk reserve processes and the GI/G/ 1 queue , 1982 .

[8]  I. Gertsbakh Asymptotic methods in reliability theory: a review , 1984, Advances in Applied Probability.

[9]  Elmer E Lewis,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of Markov unreliability models , 1984 .

[10]  Peter W. Glynn,et al.  Proceedings of Ihe 1986 Winter Simulation , 2022 .

[11]  R Y Rubinstein,et al.  The score function approach for sensitivity analysis of computer simulation models , 1986 .

[12]  P. Glynn,et al.  Discrete-time conversion for simulating semi-Markov processes , 1986 .

[13]  Stephen S. Lavenberg,et al.  Modeling and Analysis of Computer System Availability , 1987, Computer Performance and Reliability.

[14]  Yu-Chi Ho,et al.  Performance evaluation and perturbation analysis of discrete event dynamic systems , 1987 .

[15]  Peter W. Glynn,et al.  Likelilood ratio gradient estimation: an overview , 1987, WSC '87.

[16]  Byoung-Seon Choi,et al.  Conditional limit theorems under Markov conditioning , 1987, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[17]  Xi-Ren Cao,et al.  Convergence properties of infinitesimal perturbation analysis , 1988 .

[18]  P. Glynn,et al.  Varaince reduction in mean time to failure simulations , 1988, 1988 Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings.

[19]  R. Suri,et al.  Perturbation analysis gives strongly consistent sensitivity estimates for the M/G/ 1 queue , 1988 .

[20]  Philip Heidelberger,et al.  Varaince reduction in mean time to failure simulations (1988) , 2007, WSC '07.

[21]  János Sztrik Asymptotic Reliability Analysis of Some Complex Systems with Repair Operating in Random Environments , 1989, J. Inf. Process. Cybern..

[22]  Michael N. Katehakis,et al.  On the maintenance of systems composed of highly reliable components , 1989 .

[23]  Peter W. Glynn Likelihood Ratio Derivative Estimators For Stochastic Systems , 1989, 1989 Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings.

[24]  Venkat Anantharam,et al.  How large delays build up in a GI/G/1 queue , 1989, Queueing Syst. Theory Appl..

[25]  P. Glynn,et al.  Stochastic Optimization by Simulation: Some Experiments with a Simple Steady-State Queue , 1989 .

[26]  R. Suri,et al.  Perturbation analysis: the state of the art and research issues explained via the GI/G/1 queue , 1989, Proc. IEEE.

[27]  Donald L. Iglehart,et al.  Importance sampling for stochastic simulations , 1989 .

[28]  János Sztrik,et al.  Asymptotic analysis of some controlled finite-source queueing systems , 1989, Acta Cybern..

[29]  Reuven Y. Rubinstein,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis and Performance Extrapolation for Computer Simulation Models , 1989, Oper. Res..

[30]  Alan Weiss,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for Simulations via Likelihood Ratios , 1989, Oper. Res..

[31]  Peter W. Glynn,et al.  Simulation and analysis of highly reliable systems , 1990 .

[32]  P. L’Ecuyer,et al.  A Unified View of the IPA, SF, and LR Gradient Estimation Techniques , 1990 .

[33]  Paul Glasserman,et al.  Gradient Estimation Via Perturbation Analysis , 1990 .

[34]  Ward Whitt,et al.  The Asymptotic Efficiency of Simulation Estimators , 1992, Oper. Res..

[35]  Paul Glasserman,et al.  Derivative Estimates from Simulation of Continuous-Time Markov Chains , 1992, Oper. Res..

[36]  Philip Heidelberger,et al.  A Unified Framework for Simulating Markovian Models of Highly Dependable Systems , 1992, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[37]  P. Glasserman Stochastic monotonicity and conditional Monte Carlo for likelihood ratios , 1993, Advances in Applied Probability.

[38]  Peter W. Glynn,et al.  Likelihood Ratio Sensitivity Analysis for Markovian Models of Highly Dependable Systems , 1994, Oper. Res..

[39]  Perwez Shahabuddin,et al.  Importance sampling for the simulation of highly reliable Markovian systems , 1994 .

[40]  P. Glynn LIKELIHOOD RATIO GRADIENT ESTIMATION : AN OVERVIEW by , 2022 .