A fully-autonomous hovercraft inspired by bees: Wall following and speed control in straight and tapered corridors

The small autonomous vehicles of the future will have to navigate close to obstacles in highly unpredictable environments. Risky tasks of this kind may require novel sensors and control methods that differ from conventional approaches. Recent ethological findings have shown that complex navigation tasks such as obstacle avoidance and speed control are performed by flying insects on the basis of optic flow (OF) cues, although insects' compound eyes have a very poor spatial resolution. The present paper deals with the implementation of an optic flow-based autopilot on a fully autonomous hovercraft. Tests were performed on this small (878-gram) innovative robotic platform in straight and tapered corridors lined with natural panoramas. A bilateral OF regulator controls the robot's forward speed (up to 0.8m/s), while a unilateral OF regulator controls the robot's clearance from the two walls. A micro-gyrometer and a tiny magnetic compass ensure that the hovercraft travels forward in the corridor without yawing. The lateral OFs are measured by two minimalist eyes mounted sideways opposite to each other. For the first time, the hovercraft was found to be capable of adjusting both its forward speed and its clearance from the walls, in both straight and tapered corridors, without requiring any distance or speed measurements, that is, without any need for on-board rangefinders or tachometers.

[1]  Nicolas Franceschini,et al.  A bee in the corridor: centering and wall-following , 2008, Naturwissenschaften.

[2]  R.M. Murray,et al.  The Caltech Multi-Vehicle Wireless Testbed , 2002, Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2002..

[3]  William H. Warren,et al.  Robot navigation from a Gibsonian viewpoint , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[4]  Nick Barnes,et al.  A Robust Docking Strategy for a Mobile Robot Using Flow Field Divergence , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[5]  Stéphane Viollet,et al.  Bio-inspired optical flow circuits for the visual guidance of micro air vehicles , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, 2003. ISCAS '03..

[6]  Nicolas H. Franceschini,et al.  A vision-based autopilot for a miniature air vehicle: joint speed control and lateral obstacle avoidance , 2008, Auton. Robots.

[7]  Nicolas H. Franceschini,et al.  Optic flow regulation: the key to aircraft automatic guidance , 2005, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[8]  Moritz Diehl,et al.  Nonlinear Receding Horizon Control of an Underactuated Hovercraft Using a Real-Time Algorithm with Multiple Shooting and Continuation / Krylov Method , 2022 .

[9]  R.M. Murray,et al.  MVWT-II: the second generation Caltech Multi-Vehicle Wireless Testbed , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference.

[10]  Zhang,et al.  Honeybee navigation en route to the goal: visual flight control and odometry , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[11]  Geoffrey Portelli,et al.  Honeybees' Speed Depends on Dorsal as Well as Lateral, Ventral and Frontal Optic Flows , 2011, PloS one.

[12]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  A hovercraft robot that uses insect-inspired visual autocorrelation for motion control in a corridor , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics.

[13]  Giulio Sandini,et al.  Divergent stereo in autonomous navigation: From bees to robots , 1995, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[14]  Michael H Dickinson,et al.  The influence of visual landscape on the free flight behavior of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[15]  H. Wagner.  Flow-field variables trigger landing in flies , 1982, Nature.

[16]  Stéphane Viollet,et al.  A novel 1-gram insect based device measuring visual motion along 5 optical directions , 2011, 2011 IEEE SENSORS Proceedings.

[17]  Antonis A. Argyros,et al.  Biomimetic centering behavior [mobile robots with panoramic sensors] , 2004, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[18]  N. Franceschini,et al.  Honeybees change their height to restore their optic flow , 2010, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[19]  N. Franceschini,et al.  A 1-gram dual sensorless speed governor for micro-air vehicles , 2008, Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation.

[20]  Jean-Arcady Meyer,et al.  A contribution to vision-based autonomous helicopter flight in urban environments , 2005, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[21]  Dario Floreano,et al.  A 10-gram vision-based flying robot , 2007, Adv. Robotics.

[22]  Karen Roberts,et al.  'Bee-bot': using peripheral optical flow to avoid obstacles , 1992, Other Conferences.

[23]  T. S. Collett,et al.  Some operating rules for the optomotor system of a hoverfly during voluntary flight , 1980, Journal of comparative physiology.

[24]  Mandyam V. Srinivasan,et al.  Visual Control of Flight Speed and Height in the Honeybee , 2006, SAB.

[25]  Stéphane Viollet,et al.  Outdoor field performances of insect‐based visual motion sensors , 2011, J. Field Robotics.

[26]  N. Franceschini,et al.  From insect vision to robot vision , 1992 .

[27]  M. Dacke,et al.  Minimum viewing angle for visually guided ground speed control in bumblebees , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[28]  Dario Floreano,et al.  Toward 30-gram Autonomous Indoor Aircraft: Vision-based Obstacle Avoidance and Altitude Control , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[29]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Combined optic-flow and stereo-based navigation of urban canyons for a UAV , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[30]  Dario Floreano,et al.  Vision-based control of near-obstacle flight , 2009, Auton. Robots.

[31]  R.M. Murray,et al.  A Control-Oriented Analysis of Bio-inspired Visuomotor Convergence , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[32]  Paul F. M. J. Verschure,et al.  Non-Linear Neuronal Responses as an Emergent Property of Afferent Networks: A Case Study of the Locust Lobula Giant Movement Detector , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[33]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Range perception through apparent image speed in freely flying honeybees , 1991, Visual Neuroscience.

[34]  Stéphane Viollet,et al.  Characteristics of Three Miniature Bio-inspired Optic Flow Sensors in Natural Environments , 2010, 2010 Fourth International Conference on Sensor Technologies and Applications.

[35]  Marko Pudas,et al.  A miniature bio-inspired optic flow sensor based on low temperature co-fired ceramics (LTCC) technology , 2007 .

[36]  James Sean Humbert,et al.  Bioinspired Visuomotor Convergence , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[37]  Nicolas Franceschini,et al.  Visual Guidance Of A Mobile Robot Equipped With A Network Of Self-Motion Sensors , 1990, Other Conferences.

[38]  Franck Ruffier,et al.  Controlling docking, altitude and speed in a circular high-roofed tunnel thanks to the optic flow , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.