Commitment bias: mistaken partner selection or ancient wisdom?

Evidence across the social and behavioral sciences points to psychological mechanisms that facilitate the formation and maintenance of interpersonal commitment. In addition, evolutionary simulation studies suggest that a tendency for increased, seemingly irrational commitment is an important trait of successful exchange strategies. However, empirical research that tests corresponding psychological mechanisms is still largely lacking. Here an experimental test is proposed for one such mechanism, termed the commitment bias, which is hypothesized to increase people's commitment to existing partners beyond instrumental reasons. To exclude one alternative explanation, the commitment bias is distinguished from uncertainty reduction. Results from a cross-culturally replicated laboratory experiment (USA, China, and the Netherlands) provide support for the argument but also point to the importance of culture as an alternative or mediating factor.

[1]  R. Smaniotto,et al.  'You scratch my back and I scratch yours' versus 'love thy neighbour': two proximate mechanisms of reciprocal altruism , 2004 .

[2]  I. Back Commitment and evolution : connecting emotion and reason in long-term relationships , 2007 .

[3]  A. Flache,et al.  The Adaptive Rationality of Interpersonal Commitment , 2008 .

[4]  T. Yamagishi,et al.  Selective Play: Choosing Partners in an Uncertain World , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[5]  K. Cook,et al.  Power, Equity and Commitment in Exchange Networks , 1978 .

[6]  P. Wiessner Hunting, healing, and hxaro exchange A long-term perspective on !Kung (Ju/'hoansi) large-game hunting , 2002 .

[7]  A. Barnard,et al.  Politics and History in Band Societies , 1982 .

[8]  C. Pedersen How Love Evolved from Sex and Gave Birth to Intelligence and Human Nature , 2004 .

[9]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  Andreas Flache,et al.  The Viability of Cooperation Based on Interpersonal Commitment , 2006, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[11]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[12]  Motoki Watabe,et al.  Uncertainty, Trust, and Commitment Formation in the United States and Japan1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  Peter Hammerstein,et al.  Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation , 2003 .

[14]  R. Smaniotto,et al.  RECIPROCAL ALTRUISM UNDER CONDITIONS OF PARTNER SELECTION , 2001 .

[15]  P. Wiessner Risk, reciprocity and social influences on Kung San economics. , 1982 .

[16]  John M. Martz,et al.  The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size , 1998 .

[17]  E. Lawler,et al.  Commitment in exchange relations : test of a theory of relational cohesion , 1996 .

[18]  P. Kollock The Emergence of Exchange Structures: An Experimental Study of Uncertainty, Commitment, and Trust , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[20]  A. Flache,et al.  Social Simulation: Technologies, Advances and New Discoveries , 2007 .