Policy analysis and decision making in a network: how to improve the quality of analysis and the impact on decision making

In a network, parties have different interests and are interdependent. This hampers collective decision making. If, in such a network, a policy analysis is made to support the decision making, the findings from this analysis are likely to lack authority. For a policy analysis to be authoritative and to contribute to collective decision making, a process of interaction between the analyst and the parties concerned should be organized. This is called process management. This article presents a number of guidelines for such a process. They are based on two case studies into the use of policy analysis in networks.

[1]  D. Roush.  Making collaboration work : lessons from innovation in natural resource management , 2002 .

[2]  Hans de Bruijn,et al.  Process Management and the Protection of the Parties’ Core Values , 2002 .

[3]  Jeff M. Bickerton,et al.  Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving in , 2002 .

[4]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[5]  A. Giddens.  Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics , 1994 .

[6]  Charles G. Field.  Building consensus for affordable housing , 1997 .

[7]  D. Collingridge,et al.  Science speaks to power: The role of experts in policy making , 1986 .

[8]  J. Guinée.  Handbook on life cycle assessment — operational guide to the ISO standards , 2001 .

[9]  Igor S. Mayer,et al.  Debating technologies. A methodological contribution to the design and evaluation of participatory policy analysis , 1997 .

[10]  Edmund M. Burke.  Citizen Participation Strategies , 1968 .

[11]  J. Innes.  Planning Through Consensus Building: A New View of the Comprehensive Planning Ideal , 1996 .

[12]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  REDUNDANCY AND DIVERSITY IN GOVERNING AND MANAGING COMMON-POOL RESOURCES , 2000 .

[13]  Louise G. White.  Interactive Policy Analysis: Process Methods for Policy Reform , 2002 .

[14]  J. A. de Bruijn,et al.  Process management , 2002 .

[15]  David Boddy,et al.  Organizations in the Network Age , 1995 .

[16]  Ortwin Renn.  The role of risk communication and public dialogue for improving risk management , 1998 .

[17]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[18]  R. Mayntz,et al.  Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence And Theoretical Considerations , 1991 .

[19]  J. Bohman.  Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy , 1996 .

[20]  H. Fineberg,et al.  Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1996 .

[21]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Public participation in decision making: A three-step procedure , 1993, Policy Sciences.

[22]  B. Johnson.  Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach , 2002 .