What Does the Paris Climate Change Agreement Mean for Local Policy? Downscaling the Remaining Global Carbon Budget to Sub-National Areas

[1]  Lukas H. Meyer,et al.  Fairness critically conditions the carbon budget allocation across countries , 2022, Global Environmental Change.

[2]  M. Obersteiner,et al.  The meaning of net zero and how to get it right , 2021, Nature Climate Change.

[3]  J. Rogelj,et al.  Net-zero emissions targets are vague: three ways to fix , 2021, Nature.

[4]  A. Hsu,et al.  Beyond states: Harnessing sub-national actors for the deep decarbonisation of cities, regions, and businesses , 2020 .

[5]  J. Canadell,et al.  Opportunities and challenges in using remaining carbon budgets to guide climate policy , 2020, Nature Geoscience.

[6]  Evelina Trutnevyte,et al.  Regional impacts of electricity system transition in Central Europe until 2035 , 2020, Nature Communications.

[7]  Lukas H. Meyer,et al.  Sectoral carbon budgets as an evaluation framework for the built environment , 2020 .

[8]  J. Broderick,et al.  A factor of two: how the mitigation plans of ‘climate progressive’ nations fall far short of Paris-compliant pathways , 2020, Climate Policy.

[9]  A. Hsu,et al.  Beyond national climate action: the impact of region, city, and business commitments on global greenhouse gas emissions , 2020 .

[10]  P. Lucas,et al.  Allocating planetary boundaries to large economies: Distributional consequences of alternative perspectives on distributive fairness , 2020, Global Environmental Change.

[11]  T. Lützkendorf,et al.  On net zero GHG emission targets for climate protection in cities: More questions than answers? , 2019, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.

[12]  Nils Markusson,et al.  Beyond “Net-Zero”: A Case for Separate Targets for Emissions Reduction and Negative Emissions , 2019, Front. Clim..

[13]  A. Hsu,et al.  Exploring links between national climate strategies and non-state and subnational climate action in nationally determined contributions (NDCs) , 2019, Making Climate Action More Effective.

[14]  Ken’ichi Matsumoto,et al.  Driving forces underlying sub-national carbon dioxide emissions within the household sector and implications for the Paris Agreement targets in Japan , 2018, Applied Energy.

[15]  M. Sharmina,et al.  What if negative emission technologies fail at scale? Implications of the Paris Agreement for big emitting nations , 2018 .

[16]  Matthew R. Shaner,et al.  Net-zero emissions energy systems , 2018, Science.

[17]  M. Allen,et al.  A solution to the misrepresentations of CO2-equivalent emissions of short-lived climate pollutants under ambitious mitigation , 2018, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science.

[18]  G. Peters.  Beyond carbon budgets , 2018, Nature Geoscience.

[19]  J. Krug.  Accounting of GHG emissions and removals from forest management: a long road from Kyoto to Paris , 2018, Carbon Balance and Management.

[20]  Peter Bergamaschi,et al.  EDGAR v4.3.2 Global Atlas of the three major greenhouse gas emissions for the period 1970–2012 , 2017, Earth System Science Data.

[21]  Conor J. Walsh,et al.  Charting a low carbon future for shipping: A UK perspective , 2017 .

[22]  V. C. Broto.  Urban Governance and the Politics of Climate change , 2017 .

[23]  P. Friedlingstein,et al.  Estimating Carbon Budgets for Ambitious Climate Targets , 2017, Current Climate Change Reports.

[24]  G. Ellis,et al.  Subnational governance for the low carbon energy transition: Mapping the UK’s ‘Energy Constitution’ , 2017 .

[25]  G. Peters,et al.  The trouble with negative emissions , 2016, Science.

[26]  Jens-Phillip Petersen,et al.  Energy concepts for self-supplying communities based on local and renewable energy sources: A case study from northern Germany , 2016 .

[27]  Clair Gough,et al.  Expert assessment concludes negative emissions scenarios may not deliver , 2016 .

[28]  O Heidrich,et al.  National climate policies across Europe and their impacts on cities strategies. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[29]  John R Porter,et al.  Decoupling of greenhouse gas emissions from global agricultural production: 1970–2050 , 2016, Global change biology.

[30]  Joeri Rogelj,et al.  National post-2020 greenhouse gas targets and diversity-aware leadership , 2015 .

[31]  Alice Bows-Larkin,et al.  All adrift: aviation, shipping, and climate change policy , 2015 .

[32]  Harriet Bulkeley,et al.  Retrofitting cities: Local governance in Sydney, Australia , 2014 .

[33]  Carly McLachlan,et al.  Importance of non-CO2 emissions in carbon management , 2014 .

[34]  Niklas Höhne,et al.  Regional GHG reduction targets based on effort sharing: a comparison of studies , 2014 .

[35]  H. Winkler,et al.  CBDR&RC in a regime applicable to all , 2014 .

[36]  Alice Bows,et al.  Exploring the scope for complementary sub-global policy to mitigate CO2 from shipping , 2012 .

[37]  F. Wood.  Who’s flying? The spatial distribution of aviation emissions in Great Britain , 2011 .

[38]  Alice Bows,et al.  Beyond ‘dangerous’ climate change: emission scenarios for a new world , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[39]  H. Winkler,et al.  Comparing developing countries under potential carbon allocation schemes , 2002 .

[40]  Joeri Rogelj,et al.  Equitable mitigation to achieve the Paris Agreement goals , 2017 .

[41]  Karl W. Steininger,et al.  Multiple carbon accounting to support just and effective climate policies , 2016 .

[42]  Alexander Teytelboym,et al.  Part I: Externalities and economic policies in road transport , 2010 .

[43]  J. Overpeck,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .